Elsevier

Psychiatry Research

Volume 210, Issue 3, 30 December 2013, Pages 969-974
Psychiatry Research

Temperament and character in transsexuals

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.07.040Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate personality in transsexuals. The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) profiles of 166 male-to-female (MF) and 88 female-to-male (FM) transsexuals were compared with those of a control group of males and females. MF and FM transsexuals scored significantly lower than males and females in RD4 (more independent) and C3 (more self-centeredness). MF transsexuals scored higher than males and females in HA4 (more fatigable), ST and ST3 (more spiritual acceptance), and lower in C5 (more opportunistic); moreover, they showed higher scores than males in RD1 (more sentimental) and lower than females in C (less cooperativeness). FM transsexuals scored lower than females in HA2 (more daring and confident), RD (less sentimental), and C5 (more opportunistic). Compared with FM, MF transsexuals scored higher on HA2 (more fearful), RD, RD1 (more sentimental), ST, ST2 and ST3 (more spiritual). All these differences were less than half a standard deviation except for C3. Data show that transsexuals and controls display a similar personality profile, even though there are some differential personality traits. Moreover, the personality profile of transsexuals was closer to the profile of subjects who shared their gender identity than those who shared their anatomical sex.

Introduction

Transsexualism or gender identity disorder of adulthood or adolescence is characterized by a strong and persistent cross-gender identification and accompanied by persistent discomfort with the biological sex or sense of inappropriateness in the gender role of that sex. It is usually accompanied by the wish to make the body as congruent as possible with the preferred sex through hormone treatment and sex reassignment surgery (World Health Organization, 1993, American Psychiatric Association, 2000). However, information about whether behavior and personality in these subjects are congruent with the preferred sex is still lacking; this knowledge would provide valuable insights into the nature of this disorder.

Evolutionary psychologists have emphasized that divergent selection pressures on males and females are expected to produce consistent personality differences according to gender; greater sex differences are most likely to be found in traits and behaviors that ultimately relate to mating and parenting (Del Giudice et al., 2012). Indeed, personality differences between men and women are well established in the literature (Mealey, 2000, Del Giudice et al., 2012). On average, females tend to be more nurturing, warm, affiliative and anxious than males, as well as less aggressive, impulsive, dominant, sensation-seeking, and risk-taking (Mealey, 2000).

In transsexuals, differences in personality between male-to-female (MF) and female-to-male (FM) subjects have been rarely reported, and the existing studies mainly assess the presence of psychopathology. The most commonly used psychometric instruments in the assessment of transsexual patients have been the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) (Hathaway and McKinley, 1982) and the MMPI-2 (Butcher, 2001). Specifically, several studies have found that transsexuals are notably free of psychopathology using these instruments (Miach et al., 2000, Michel et al., 2002, Vidal-Hagemeijer et al., 2003, Coussinoux et al., 2005, Gomez-Gil et al., 2008, de Vries et al., 2011). Two further studies have used structured clinical interviews for categorical personality disorder diagnosis according to DSM-III-R and DSM-IV criteria (Bodlund et al., 1993, Haraldsen and Dahl, 2000), and another report has used the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (Eysenck and Eysenck, 1978) for dimensional evaluation of personality in transsexuals (Bozkurt et al., 2006). Bodlund et al. (1993) found significantly more criteria for pathologic personality among transsexuals (29%) than controls (17%), as well as more sub-threshold pathologic personality traits; however, their sample size was small (9 MF and 10 FM subjects). In contrast, Haraldsen and Dahl (2000) found that although the gender dysphoric patients generally scored slightly higher than the healthy control group, all scores were within the normal range, thus suggesting a low level of self-rated psychopathology and similar personality traits in transsexuals and controls. Bozkurt et al. (2006) found that transsexual participants showed significantly higher mean neuroticism scores than controls; however, the transsexual sample was also reduced (n=52) and limited to MF subjects. Given that transsexuals can be easily stigmatized, more studies are needed with larger samples and up-to-date instruments to dilucidate if their personalities are or are not different from that of the general population.

The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) is a self-report instrument based on the Unified Biosocial Theory of Personality of Cloninger; it measures four temperament dimensions and three character dimensions (Cloninger, 1994). It could be a well-suited instrument to evaluate personality in transsexuals due to its widespread use in both clinical and nonclinical populations. Furthermore, this instrument has been largely used to investigate sex differences in personality between men and women in a variety of cultures. Some research (Cloninger, 1994, Mendlowicz et al., 2000, Parker et al., 2003) and a recently published cross-cultural meta-analysis on sex differences in Cloninger's temperament dimensions (Miettunen et al., 2007) concluded that women scored consistently higher in the Harm Avoidance (HA) and Reward Dependence (RD) temperament dimensions. Similar differences have also been found in healthy Spanish (Al-Halabí et al., 2011) and Mexican (Fresan et al., 2011) populations. To the best of our knowledge, personality profile and sex differences according to the TCI have not been previously studied in transsexuals.

The aims of the present study were: (i) to compare the temperament and character dimensions of transsexuals with those of a control sample from the literature (Al-Halabí et al., 2011); and (ii) to evaluate sex differences between MF and FM transsexuals. Based on the literature (Miettunen et al., 2007, Al-Halabí et al., 2011), we hypothesize that MF transsexuals, like control females, would show higher scores in the HA and RD dimensions than FM transsexuals. That is, personality would be congruent with gender identity.

Section snippets

Sample

The sample was comprised of 269 transsexual volunteers recruited through the Gender Identity Unit of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. This public hospital is the only center providing specialized and comprehensive psychiatric, psychological, endocrine, and surgical sex reassignment therapy for transsexual patients in Catalonia.

Diagnostic assessment of transsexualism, or gender identity disorder in adulthood or adolescence was formulated according to the 10th revision of the ICD Classification

Demographical characteristics

The response rate was 90.7% of 280 patients who were invited to participate, with failure to participate being mainly due to declining to participate or to incomplete answers. The final study sample consisted of 254 transsexuals (166 MF and 88 FM).

Transsexuals were approximately 10 years younger than the control group (MF vs. male; t=9.501; p<0.001; FM vs. female; t=9.015; p<0.001), but no differences were found between MF and FM subjects concerning age, educational level, or employment status (

Discussion

The present study is the first to examine personality in a large sample of transsexual subjects of both sexes and to compare personality profiles with a control group from the literature.

The first relevant finding is that MF and FM transsexual subjects show normal personality scores. That is, differences with respect to the controls were less than half a standard deviation. Nevertheless, the significant differences, although clinically not important, may have some theoretical relevance.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Igualdad (MI), Instituto de la Mujer, grant IMG2009-PI040964, Ministerio de Economía e Innovación, grant PSI2011-24496, and Junta de Andalucia (JA) grant PI-0254/2007. Leire Zubiaurre-Elorza holds a fellowship from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, AP2008-00935.

References (30)

  • J.N. Butcher

    MMPI-2: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation

    (2001)
  • C.R. Cloninger

    The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): a Guide to its Development and Use

    (1994)
  • M. Del Giudice et al.

    The distance between Mars and Venus: measuring global sex differences in personality

    PLoS One

    (2012)
  • H.J. Eysenck et al.

    Manual of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire

    (1978)
  • E. Gomez-Gil et al.

    Sociodemographic, clinical, and psychiatric characteristics of transsexuals from Spain

    Archives of Sexual Behavior

    (2009)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Genotypes and Haplotypes of the Estrogen Receptor α Gene (ESR1) Are Associated With Female-to-Male Gender Dysphoria

      2017, Journal of Sexual Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      We used semistructured sociodemographic, clinical, and psychiatric interviews.29 Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics from a similar Spanish sample have been described in detail elsewhere.30–34 The exclusion criteria were head trauma, neurologic disorder, major medical condition, and history of alcohol and/or drug abuse.

    • Differences in personality traits between male-to-female and female-to-male gender identity disorder subjects

      2014, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In fact, the proportion of FtM patients who had marriage as a female is very low, and very few had children, while MtF-type GID patients seem to be less homogeneous and have more confused gender orientation (Okabe et al., 2008). It has been recently suggested that some differences in personality traits exist between MtF and FtM subjects, e.g., higher harm avoidance, reward dependence and self-transcendence in MtF than those in FtM (Gómez-Gil et al., 2013) assessed by the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI), which was developed by Cloninger et al. (1994). However, studies focusing on personality traits in GID patients are still few.

    • Defensive functioning in MtF and FtM transsexuals

      2014, Comprehensive Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Secondly, given that the defensive profile of men and women has shown significant differences across all age groups [11,28–30], each of the transsexual groups will be compared with male and female controls in order to assess whether similarities in the defensive profile can be found as a result of constitutional variables or adherence to gender stereotypes. The comparison with both control groups is also necessary given that research on whether personality traits in transsexuals are congruent with the preferred sex is still lacking [31]; also, evidence from previous studies using self-report instruments (mainly the MMPI-II) in GID patients exists that the psychological profiles as derived using norms of the desired gender are less deviant and dysfunctional than those obtained adopting the anatomical sex as reference [14]. Adults suffering from GID seeking sex reassignment surgery at two gender clinics (Gender Identity Disorder Unit, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, Milan and Clinical Psychology Unit of the Clinical Department of Neuroscience and Behaviour of “Federico II” University Hospital, Naples) between 2011 and January 2013 were asked to participate.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text