Clinical Research
Long-term chipping and failure rates of implant-supported and combined tooth–implant-supported metal-ceramic and ceramic fixed dental prostheses: A cohort study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.05.020Get rights and content

Abstract

Statement of problem

Combined tooth–implant-supported fixed dental prostheses have been associated with an increased risk of long-term failure. Furthermore, high chipping rates have been reported for ceramic fixed dental prostheses. However, clinical data are sparse.

Purpose

The purpose of this observational cohort study was to evaluate the chipping and failure rates of metal-ceramic and ceramic implant-supported and combined tooth–implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.

Material and methods

Four hundred thirty-four fixed dental prostheses placed in 324 patients (mean age: 60.8 years) were selected from a prospective clinical long-term study comprising 213 implant-supported fixed dental prostheses, 66 implant-supported cantilever fixed dental prostheses, and 155 tooth–implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (n=260) were fabricated with a high noble metal alloy (n=225) or Co-Cr base metal alloy (n=35) frameworks. Ceramic fixed dental prostheses (n=174) were all zirconia based and had monolithic (n=68), completely veneered (n=43), or partially veneered frameworks (n=63). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the survival probability and the chipping-free survival rate of the fixed dental prostheses.

Results

During the observation period of 0.5 to 12.6 years (mean: 4.26 years), 17 fixed dental prostheses failed because of implant failure (n=6), tooth loss (n=5), major chipping (n=5), or abutment screw loosening (n=1). Survival probability was 96% after 5 years and 91% after 10 years. Cox regression analysis showed that age, sex, fixed dental prosthesis location, type of fixed dental prosthesis support, and fixed dental prosthesis material had no significant effect on fixed dental prosthesis failure. Chipping (n=61) was significantly affected by the framework material and type of veneer (P=.001). After 5 years, the greatest incidence of chipping (39%) was observed for zirconia fixed dental prostheses with a complete veneer compared with an 18% incidence of chipping for metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses with a high noble metal framework. A lower incidence of chipping was observed for zirconia fixed dental prostheses with a partial veneer or monolithic design.

Conclusions

Implant–implant-supported and combined tooth–implant-supported fixed dental prostheses have promising long-term survival rates. Chipping seems to occur less frequently in monolithic or partially veneered fixed dental prostheses than in fixed dental prostheses with complete veneers.

Section snippets

Material and methods

This observational cohort study was conducted in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local review board (approval number: 027/2005). All participants gave their informed and written consent to scientific use of the recorded data.

All implant-supported or tooth–implant-supported FDPs placed by members of the Department of Prosthodontics with an observation period of at least 6 months formed the primary data set. In the further selection

Results

In a mean observation period of 4.26 years (maximum: 12.6 years), 17 FDPs failed. Reasons for failure were loss of implants (n=6), loss of abutment teeth (n=5), loosening of an abutment screw (n=1), and extended chipping of veneers (n=5). The FDP with the loosened abutment had to be removed to gain access to the abutment screw under the definitively cemented FDP and was then replaced. Extended chipping was diagnosed if functional or esthetic problems resulted in replacement of the FDP (Fig. 2).

Discussion

The research hypothesis that the incidence of chipping would be greater for ceramic FDPs than for metal-ceramic FDPs was accepted but only for ceramic FDPs with complete veneers. In contrast, a lower incidence of chipping was observed for zirconia FDPs without a veneer (monolithic design) or with partial veneers.

Implant failure (n=6) and loss of abutment teeth (n=5) were the most common reasons for FDP failure in this study, meaning that failures were predominately biological in nature.

Conclusions

Based on the findings of this clinical study, the following conclusions were drawn:

  • 1.

    Survival was not affected by the framework material, but zirconia was a significant risk factor for chipping with a hazard ratio of 2.76 for FDPs with a complete veneer.

  • 2.

    The incidence of chipping of zirconia FDPs can be reduced by the use of monolithic zirconia or partial veneers. However, long-term performance cannot be predicted because the observation period for these types of zirconia FDPs was restricted to a

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the participants involved in the study for their patience during the follow-up appointments. We also thank Hazel Davies, medical copy editor, for English language revision.

References (22)

  • P. Tsaousoglou et al.

    The effect of rigid and non-rigid connections between implants and teeth on biological and technical complications: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

    Clin Oral Implants Res

    (2017)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Performance of high-translucent zirconia CAD/CAM fixed dental prostheses using a digital workflow: A clinical study up to 6 years

      2023, Journal of Dental Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recently zirconia has become an increasingly popular material that offers more advantages over their comparative counterparts.4–9 Traditional materials such as all-ceramic or porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) have been used, however, these materials have inherent shortcomings such as fracture and/or chipping leading to failure.10–12 Additionally, the aesthetic limitations of PFMs could be considered a failure by patient preference standards.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text