Clinical ResearchLong-term chipping and failure rates of implant-supported and combined tooth–implant-supported metal-ceramic and ceramic fixed dental prostheses: A cohort study
Section snippets
Material and methods
This observational cohort study was conducted in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local review board (approval number: 027/2005). All participants gave their informed and written consent to scientific use of the recorded data.
All implant-supported or tooth–implant-supported FDPs placed by members of the Department of Prosthodontics with an observation period of at least 6 months formed the primary data set. In the further selection
Results
In a mean observation period of 4.26 years (maximum: 12.6 years), 17 FDPs failed. Reasons for failure were loss of implants (n=6), loss of abutment teeth (n=5), loosening of an abutment screw (n=1), and extended chipping of veneers (n=5). The FDP with the loosened abutment had to be removed to gain access to the abutment screw under the definitively cemented FDP and was then replaced. Extended chipping was diagnosed if functional or esthetic problems resulted in replacement of the FDP (Fig. 2).
Discussion
The research hypothesis that the incidence of chipping would be greater for ceramic FDPs than for metal-ceramic FDPs was accepted but only for ceramic FDPs with complete veneers. In contrast, a lower incidence of chipping was observed for zirconia FDPs without a veneer (monolithic design) or with partial veneers.
Implant failure (n=6) and loss of abutment teeth (n=5) were the most common reasons for FDP failure in this study, meaning that failures were predominately biological in nature.
Conclusions
Based on the findings of this clinical study, the following conclusions were drawn:
- 1.
Survival was not affected by the framework material, but zirconia was a significant risk factor for chipping with a hazard ratio of 2.76 for FDPs with a complete veneer.
- 2.
The incidence of chipping of zirconia FDPs can be reduced by the use of monolithic zirconia or partial veneers. However, long-term performance cannot be predicted because the observation period for these types of zirconia FDPs was restricted to a
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the participants involved in the study for their patience during the follow-up appointments. We also thank Hazel Davies, medical copy editor, for English language revision.
References (22)
- et al.
Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review
J Prosthet Dent
(2012) - et al.
All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: multiple-unit FDPs
Dent Mater
(2015) - et al.
Prospective evaluation of zirconia based tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: 3-year results
J Dent
(2015) - et al.
Impact of prosthetic material on mid- and long-term outcome of dental implants supporting single crowns and fixed partial dentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Eur J Oral Implant
(2017) - et al.
Prosthetic treatment planning on the basis of scientific evidence
J Oral Rehabil
(2008) - et al.
Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs)
Clin Oral Implants Res
(2007) - et al.
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years
Clin Oral Implants Res
(2012) - et al.
Clinical outcomes of partial and full-arch all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Clin Oral Implants Res
(2018) - et al.
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses
Clin Oral Implants Res
(2018) - et al.
Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
Clin Oral Implants Res
(2013)
The effect of rigid and non-rigid connections between implants and teeth on biological and technical complications: a systematic review and a meta-analysis
Clin Oral Implants Res
Cited by (16)
Performance of high-translucent zirconia CAD/CAM fixed dental prostheses using a digital workflow: A clinical study up to 6 years
2023, Journal of Dental SciencesCitation Excerpt :Recently zirconia has become an increasingly popular material that offers more advantages over their comparative counterparts.4–9 Traditional materials such as all-ceramic or porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) have been used, however, these materials have inherent shortcomings such as fracture and/or chipping leading to failure.10–12 Additionally, the aesthetic limitations of PFMs could be considered a failure by patient preference standards.
Effect of external staining on the optical properties and surface roughness of monolithic zirconia of different thicknesses
2021, Journal of Prosthetic DentistryIs Periodontal and PeriImplant Disease Associated with Fixed Partial Denture Use? A 25-year Prospective Case Series
2024, European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative DentistryA critical review of dental biomaterials with an emphasis on biocompatibility
2023, Dental and Medical Problems