Elsevier

Journal of Professional Nursing

Volume 30, Issue 5, September–October 2014, Pages 436-442
Journal of Professional Nursing

Original Article
HESI Admission Assessment (A2) Examination Scores, Program Progression, and NCLEX-RN Success in Baccalaureate Nursing: An Exploratory Study of Dependable Academic Indicators of Success

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2014.01.007Get rights and content

In an effort to meet the demand for well-educated, high-quality nurses, schools of nursing seek to admit those candidates most likely to have both timely progression and first-time success on the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN). Finding the right combination of academic indicators, which are most predictive of success, continues to be an ongoing challenge for entry-level baccalaureate nursing programs across the United States. This pilot study explored the relationship of a standardized admission examination, the Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) Admission Assessment (A2) Examination to preadmission grade point average (GPA), science GPA, and nursing GPA using a retrospective descriptive design. In addition, the predictive ability of the A2 Examination, preadmission GPA, and science GPA related to timely progression and NCLEX-RN success were explored. In a sample of 89 students, no relationship was found between the A2 Examination and preadmission GPA or science GPA. The A2 Examination was correlated with nursing GPA and NCLEX-RN success but not with timely progression. Further studies are needed to explore the utility and predictive ability of standardized examinations such as the A2 Examination and the contribution of such examinations to evidence-based admission decision making.

Section snippets

Academic Factors

Previous studies have cited academic factors as predictive in both progression and NCLEX-RN success. These included prenursing academic achievements, for example, high school rank, preadmission grade point average (GPA), nursing prerequisite/science GPA, achievement in individual science courses, SAT or ACT scores and scores on the Watson–Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (Beeson and Kissling, 2001, Seldomridge and DiBartolo, 2004, Waterhouse and Beeman, 2003). In their study, Seldomridge and

Design

An exploratory retrospective descriptive design was used to compare undergraduate nursing student predictors of first-time success on the NCLEX-RN and timely progression through the nursing program.

Sample and Setting

The population for this study was traditional undergraduate nursing students from a midsized public, accredited, baccalaureate nursing program located in a rural area of the mid-Atlantic during the period 2008–2010. Three cohorts were admitted to the nursing program for the fall semester in each

Sample Characteristics

Demographic characteristics of all students and the final sample (n = 89) can be seen in Table 1. Seventy-three (82%) of subjects completed the major, five (5.6%) were still in progress, and 11 (12.4%) withdrew, changed major, or were dismissed. The majority of the sample was female (93.3%, n = 83). Preadmission GPAs ranged from 2.78 to 4.0 with a mean GPA of 3.39 (SEM = .02, SD = 0.31). Scores on the A2 Examination ranged from 66.3–93.94 (M = 84, SD = 0.32). Of those students who had taken the

Discussion

These findings suggest that although a significant relationship exists between preadmission GPA, science GPA, and timely progression through a nursing program, the role of the A2 Examination as a predictor of timely progression is of no help, based on these data. Interestingly, the A2 Examination was not significantly correlated with either the preadmission GPA or science GPA in our study. In contrast, Murray, Merriman, and Adamson (2008) found a strong correlation between A2 Examination scores

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that preadmission and science GPAs may be good predictors of timely progression in a nursing program. However, in our sample, the A2 Examination was not correlated with preadmission GPA or science GPA and did not inform our nursing admissions process. Although the A2 Examination correlated with nursing GPA, our data show that it had no predictive value regarding timely progression within the program. The low number of NCLEX-RN failures among participants makes

References (22)

  • M.C. DiBartolo et al.

    A review of intervention studies to promote NCLEX-RN success of baccalaureate students

    Nurse Educator

    (2005)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Non-academic admission criterion of certified nursing assistant status for undergraduate nursing programs: A comparative case study

      2021, Journal of Professional Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Along with the general nursing shortage, the supply of qualified nurse educators for employment at many academic institutions is also inadequate (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2020). This factor has led to a limited number of available seats in undergraduate nursing programs, which results in program administrators and faculty striving to fill these seats with individuals who will complete the program and enter the workforce (Hinderer, Dibartolo, & Walsh, 2014; Strickland & Cheshire, 2017). The registered nurse workforce is currently experiencing shortages, with 20.6% of hospitals nationwide having more than a 10% vacancy rate (Sheffield, 2016).

    • Systematic review: Predictors of students’ success in baccalaureate nursing programs

      2020, Nurse Education in Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      The pre-admission science GPA has consistently been found to be a significant predictor of students' nursing GPA—that is, students with higher prerequisite science GPAs tend to have higher GPAs in their nursing courses (McClelland et al., 1992; Strickland and Cheshire, 2017; Wambuguh et al., 2016). These results are in agreement with other research findings in this review, which have reported that pre-admission science GPA is also a significant predictor of students’ timely progression in the nursing program (Hinderer et al., 2014) and program completion (Byrd et al., 1999; Elkins, 2015; Tartavoulle et al., 2018). Many nursing schools employ one or more standardized entrance exams as a means of assessing students' preparedness for the nursing program.

    • Preadmission predictors for first semester course success in a baccalaureate nursing program

      2020, Journal of Professional Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      This analysis supports that higher grades in previous courses and specifically, prerequisite science courses, and higher scores on the TEAS test predict success in first semester nursing courses (Liu, Codd, & Mills, 2018). Studies support that preadmission GPA is a significant predictor of first semester (Kowitlawakul et al., 2013) and overall nursing program success (Hinderer et al., 2014; Manieri et al., 2015; Timer & Clauson, 2011). Others found that prerequisite science GPA is significantly associated with positive course outcomes in first semester nursing students (Hinderer et al., 2014; Kowitlawakul et al., 2013; Mthimunye et al., 2018; Murray et al., 2008; Wambuguh et al., 2016) and nursing program success (Van Hofwegen et al., 2019).

    • Nurse educators’ use of lecture and active learning

      2019, Teaching and Learning in Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Active learning strategies may improve some student learning outcomes, but does using active learning strategies support new graduate success on the nursing licensure examination? Most literature regarding forecasting graduate success on the National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX) is tied to traditional markers including predictor examinations and course grades (Hinderer, Dibartolo, & Walsh, 2014; Johnson, Sanderson, Wang, & Parker, 2017). As a starting point, we conducted a survey to explore how educators perceive the extent of their use of lecture versus active learning in the classroom in prelicensure nursing programs.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text