The autoignition of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in spark-ignition engines
Introduction
Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) is a mixture of variable content, but is primarily composed of propane, propylene (propene), n-butane and iso-butane [1]. LPG has several attractive features as an alternative fuel. First, LPG vehicles can have lower emissions of both regulated pollutants and greenhouse gases than gasoline and diesel vehicles [2], [3]. When stored in liquid form, LPG also has an energy density that is comparable to other liquid transport fuels. Finally, LPG is usually of relatively low cost.
There are nonetheless only a few studies of LPG’s autoignition and knock in engines. These studies most commonly utilise correlation or reduced chemistry, e.g. [4], [5], [6], and so provide limited insight into the general autoignition problem. Further, since the components of LPG are intermediates in the oxidation of larger hydrocarbons, an improved understanding of their autoignition contributes to our understanding of autoignition more generally.
The aim of this paper is therefore to model the autoignition of arbitrary LPG blends in a spark-ignition engine. The autoignition modelling is undertaken using a kinetic model derived from those of Healy et al. [7] and Dagaut and Dayma [8]. This kinetic model is coupled with a two-zone engine model that was validated for non-autoigniting operation in a prior work [9]. The in-cylinder heat transfer and residual gas composition are both shown to affect autoignition significantly. In particular, nitric oxide (NO) is found to be a strong promoter of autoignition, in keeping with several, more fundamental studies. Indeed, the inclusion of NO in the residual gas at physically reasonable concentrations enables good agreement between the measured and modelled autoignition timing in almost all cases.
Section snippets
Experimental methods
The experimental data presented in this paper was acquired with a standard Cooperative Fuel Research (CFR) engine operated in accordance with the ASTM Research method (RON) test condition [10]. The standard engine was equipped with a gaseous fuel system that prepared mixtures of propane, propylene, n-butane and iso-butane. Each fuel was examined at the air–fuel ratio (λ) that registered the maximum Knock Intensity (KI) value on the ASTM Knockmeter unit, as summarised in Table 1. The compression
CFR engine model
The two-zone model of the CFR engine was developed using GT-Power [15]. The engine model incorporated the combustion chamber, together with sub-models of the intake and exhaust systems and the gas exchange processes. The full engine model was validated for non-autoigniting operation in a prior work [9].
In-cylinder heat transfer sub-model
The in-cylinder convective heat transfer coefficient was modelled using the Woschni correlation without swirl [16],The term ζ denotes a convective heat transfer
Effect of in-cylinder heat transfer on autoignition
The effect of heat transfer on the autoignition timing of propane was examined by adjusting the value of the convective heat transfer coefficient multiplier (ζ) in Eq. (1). The value of ζ was varied from 0.5 to 1.5, with all other model parameters remaining unchanged. Figure 3 indicates that heat transfer strongly influences the autoignition timing in a physically intuitive manner. In the case of reducing ζ, the lower in-cylinder heat transfer between the mixture and the combustion chamber
Conclusions
This paper investigated the autoignition of C3/C4 hydrocarbon mixtures in a CFR octane rating engine. The four species examined – propane, propylene (propene), n-butane and iso-butane – are the primary constituents of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), and are also important intermediates in the oxidation of larger hydrocarbons. In-cylinder pressure data was acquired for both autoigniting and non-autoigniting engine operation at the same test conditions. The latter was obtained by adding a small
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Advanced Centre for Automotive Research and Testing (ACART) and the Australian Research Council.
References (33)
- et al.
The Research and Motor octane numbers of Liquefied Petroluem Gas (LPG)
Fuel
(2013) - et al.
Chemical kinetics of the high pressure oxidation of n-butane and its relation to engine knock
Combust. Flame
(1986) - et al.
n-Butane ignition delay time measurements at high pressure and detailed chemical kinetic simulations
Combust. Flame
(2010) - et al.
The estimation of knock-points of fuels by a weighted mean square error criterion
Fuel
(2006) Combustion-chamber crevices: the major source of engine-out hydrocarbon emissions under fully warmed conditions
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
(1999)- et al.
An experimental and numerical investigation of the influence of external gas recirculation on the HCCI autoignition process in an engine: thermal, diluting, and chemical effects
Combust. Flame
(2008) - et al.
Reduction of NO by propane in a JSR at 1 atm: experimental and kinetic modeling
Fuel
(2001) - et al.
An experimental and kinetic calculation of the promotion effect of hydrocarbons on the NO–NO2 conversion in a flow reactor
Proc. Combust. Inst
(1998) Hydrocarbon–NOx interactions at low temperatures – 1. Conversion of NO to NO2 promoted by propane and the formation of HNCO
Proc. Combust. Inst
(1994)- et al.
An experimental investigation of the mutually sensitised oxidation of nitric oxide and n-butane
Proc. Combust. Inst
(1992)
Performance and emission characterization of 1.2L MPI engine with multiple fuels (E10, LPG and CNG)
SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr.
The high-pressure reduction of nitric oxide by a natural gas blend
Combust. Flame
Design and analysis of a modified CFR engine for the octane rating of liquefied petroleum gases (LPG)
SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr.
Cited by (38)
Influence of NOx chemistry on the prediction of natural gas end-gas autoignition in CFD engine simulations
2023, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute