ReviewHadronic contribution to the muon : A Dyson–Schwinger perspective
Introduction
In the search for new physics beyond the standard model the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon () is one of the most interesting observables. Compared to the corresponding electron anomaly () it is more sensitive to contributions from high lying scales. These include the weak interactions, QCD and potential new physics [1]. Especially the contributions from soft QCD desire highest attention because, due to their non-perturbative nature and the resulting technical complications, they dominate the theoretical standard model (SM) uncertainty.
The efforts of the E821 experiment at Brookhaven National Lab [2], [3] as well as theoretical efforts of more than a decade [4] culminated in a determination of down to a level where significant deviations have been found where the theoretical number is taken from Ref. [5]. Comparing theory and experiment the deviation amounts to which corresponds to a effect. In order to confirm this result the uncertainties have to be reduced further.
There are two hadronic contributions that dominate the SM uncertainty. There is the hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) contribution which gives rise to the leading hadronic contribution as well as the leading SM uncertainty contribution [5] The relevant diagram, involving the hadronic one-particle irreducible (1PI) photon self-energy is shown in Fig. 1(a). The next to leading uncertainty contribution comes from the light-by-light (LBL) scattering contribution that is shown in Fig. 1(b). Estimates from the viewpoint of effective field theory (EFT) from different approaches were recently combined into a single number [6] The uncertainty given here is rather small compared to most estimates. In fact our results indicate that this error may be far too optimistic.
Our strategy to determine these quantities is the following. We work with the Dyson–Schwinger and Bethe–Salpeter equations (DSEs/BSEs) of QCD [7], [8]. With these we calculate the HVP contribution to where we use a parameter set, among others, that is completely fixed by meson phenomenology. The HVP contribution can be compared to essentially model independent result from dispersion relations [9] such that the calculation serves as a non-trivial cross check of our methods. Afterwards we approach the LBL contribution using exactly the same truncation such that we have reasons to believe that we can ultimately reach a similar precision as in the case of HVP.
This proceedings contribution is organized as follows. First of all we summarize the employed truncation in Section 2. The HVP contribution will be discussed in Section 3 and LBL in Section 4. Afterwards we discuss our results for both of these contributions in Section 5 and conclude.
Section snippets
Calculational scheme
We work in rainbow-ladder truncation of QCD using the Maris–Tandy model of the quark–gluon interaction [10]. The central object in this approach is the quark DSE where is the full quark propagator, the corresponding bare quantity and is the quark wave-function renormalization. is the transverse projector and is the effective gluon dressing. This function is modelled in the present approach in a way such that chiral symmetry breaking
Hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP)
Here we present our results briefly, more details can be found in Ref. [13]. The central object for the HVP contribution is the hadronic tensor which corresponds to the 1PI hadronic photon self-energy and involves the non-perturbative quark propagator (5) and the self-consistent quark–photon vertex (8). The tensor is transverse due to its WTI which serves as a definition of the scalar function . We use the
Hadronic light-by-light scattering (LBL)
In the present section we discuss the LBL contribution. Within the framework of DSEs the hadronic four-point function, that is the essential ingredient here, has a description that is consistent with the one for HVP shown earlier (9). We presented this representation in Refs. [19], [20] where also more details can be found. There we also elaborate on the resonance expansion of the quark–anti-quark -matrix that is used for the results presented here. To this end we arrive at an approximate
Discussion
We presented results for the HVP as well as for the LBL contribution to the muon obtained within the framework of DSEs. We saw that in the case of HVP our results for (13) reproduce model independent dispersion relations on the less-than-ten-percent level. We see no principal reason why this should not be the case also for a full LBL calculation. Indeed, our result for the pseudo-scalar meson-exchange contribution to LBL (18) is in the ballpark of the results obtained within other
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the DFG under grant No. Fi 970/8-1, by the Helmholtz-University Young Investigator Grant No. VH-NG-332 and by the Helmholtz International Center for FAIR within the LOEWE program of the State of Hesse. RW would also like to acknowledge the support by the Austrian Science Fund FWF under Project No. P20592-N16, and by Ministerio de Educación (Spain): Programa Nacional de Movilidad de Recursos Humanos del, Plan Nacional de I-D+i 2008–2011.
References (28)
- et al.
Phys. Rep.
(2009) - et al.
Phys. Rep.
(2001) - et al.
Phys. Lett. B
(1999) - et al.
Phys. Lett. B
(1998) - et al.
Phys. Lett. B
(2011) Phys. Lett. B
(1994)- et al.
Nucl. Phys. B
(1969) J. Phys. G
(2007)Phys. Rev. C
(2006)Chin. Phys. C
(2010)
J. Phys. G
J. Phys. G
Phys. Rev. C
Cited by (3)
Muon g- 2 through a flavor structure on soft SUSY terms
2016, European Physical Journal CHadronic contributions to the muon anomaly in the Constituent Chiral Quark Model
2016, EPJ Web of ConferencesHadronic contributions to the muon anomaly in the constituent chiral quark model
2012, Journal of High Energy Physics