Elsevier

Polymer

Volume 47, Issue 7, 22 March 2006, Pages 2381-2388
Polymer

Interfacial in situ polymerization of single wall carbon nanotube/nylon 6,6 nanocomposites

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.087Get rights and content

Abstract

An interfacial polymerization method for nylon 6,6 was adapted to produce nanocomposites with single wall carbon nanotubes (SWNT) via in situ polymerization. SWNT were incorporated in purified, functionalized or surfactant stabilized forms. The functionalization of SWNT was characterized by FTIR, Raman spectroscopy and TGA and the SWNT dispersion was characterized by optical microscopy before and after the in situ polymerization. SWNT functionalization and surfactant stabilization improved the nanotube dispersion in solvents but only functionalized SWNT showed a good dispersion in composites, whereas purified and surfactant stabilized SWNT resulted in poor dispersion and nanotube agglomeration. Weak shear flow induced SWNT flocculation in these nanocomposites. The electrical and mechanical properties of the SWNT/nylon nanocomposites are briefly discussed in terms of SWNT loading, dispersion, length and type of functionalization.

Introduction

Single wall carbon nanotubes (SWNT) are considered promising fillers in nanocomposites due to their exceptional mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties and their large aspect ratio, all of which can lead to significantly improved composite performance. The fabrication of SWNT/polymer nanocomposites has been achieved by the use of several different fabrication methods that combine various polymer matrix systems with carbon nanotubes. Solution processing methods are available if the polymer is soluble in a solvent that can suspend nanotubes, enabling the mixing of polymer and nanotubes in the solvent [1], [2], [3], [4]. Melt compounding incorporates the nanotubes into a molten thermoplastic polymer that is mechanically sheared in a compounder [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Nanotubes can be added to this polymer melt in the compounder dry or suspended in a solvent to achieve good dispersion [10], [11]. In situ polymerization methods offer the possibility to incorporate SWNT into polymer matrixes while preserving the nanotube dispersion initially found in the reaction medium containing the monomers [12], [13], [14], [15], [16].

In any of these fabrication methods, SWNT that are well dispersed in solvents (including monomers) prior to composite fabrication facilitate good SWNT dispersion in the subsequent composites. This can be achieved with the aid of surfactants or functional groups that are self-assembled or covalently attached to the nanotube surface, respectively [17], [18], [19], [20]. Well-dispersed SWNT exist as small bundles or individual nanotubes. Incorporation of functionalized nanotubes is preferably done by the use of a solvent processing method or an in situ polymerization to preserve the superior nanotube dispersion.

Nylon 6,6, a commercially important thermoplastic, cannot be readily solvent processed with nanotubes because nylon 6,6 is soluble in only a few solvents that either do not suspend nanotubes, (e.g. formic acid) or may even damage nanotubes, (e.g. sulfuric acid). Melt compounding can be used, but the melt viscosity of nylon 6,6 is rather low, resulting in small shear forces and poor SWNT dispersion when dry nanotubes are added. We previously used a melt compounder to combine SWNT suspensions using HDPE [11], but this process cannot be applied to nylon 6,6 because the processing temperature (∼270 °C) is well above the boiling temperature of suitable solvents to suspend SWNT.

Here we present an interfacial in situ polymerization method for SWNT/nylon 6,6 nanocomposites that can be used with a variety of SWNT types. Based on the familiar ‘nylon rope trick’, this step growth polymerization method incorporates both an organic and an aqueous phase, each carrying one of the two highly reactive monomers. The polymerization takes place at the interface between the two immiscible organic and aqueous phases where the monomers meet and rapidly react. Thus, nanotubes can be suspended in either phase, allowing the use of functionalized nanotubes that prefer either an aqueous or an organic solvent environment. The initial dispersion of the nanotubes in suspension is preserved in the resulting nanocomposites. Here, SWNT were incorporated into nylon 6,6 nanocomposites from suspensions of purified SWNT, surfactant-assisted suspensions, or suspensions of SWNT functionalized with short alkyl chains, to study the effect of the nanotube dispersion method. The electrical and mechanical properties of the SWNT/nylon 6,6 nanocomposites are also recorded.

Section snippets

SWNT purification and functionalization

SWNT were synthesized by the high-pressure carbon monoxide method (HiPco, Rice University) [21]. Nanotube suspensions were made with purified, functionalized and surfactant suspended SWNT. Purified nanotubes were obtained after a soft-bake at 250 °C for 24 h followed by sonicating in concentrated HCl at 80 °C for 20 min, and washing with water [22]. Functionalization [19], [20] was initiated by refluxing the SWNT at 115 °C in 2.6 M nitric acid for 12 or 48 h while stirring to decorate the SWNT with

Interfacial polymerization of nylon 6,6

The reaction product of the interfacial polymerization is a white powder. Fourier-transform IR confirmed the chemical structure of the nylon 6,6, showing absorptions for all required chemical groups: N–H stretch at 3304 cm−1, C–H stretch at 2860–2940 cm−1, amide-I at 1632 cm−1, and amide-II at 1540 cm−1 [25]. The Mark–Houwink equation ([η]=KvMva using Kv=3.53×10−4 and a=0.786, for nylon 6,6 in 90% HCOOH at 25 °C [25]) was used to determine the viscosity averaged molecular weight M¯v from the

Conclusions

We have adapted an interfacial in situ polymerization method to the fabrication of SWNT/nylon 6,6 nanocomposites. This versatile fabrication method incorporates SWNT suspended in either water or toluene, and can be readily extended to a variety of nanofillers with different surface properties and solvent preferences. The quality of the nanofiller suspension prior to the in situ polymerization determines to a large extent the nanofiller dispersion in the resulting nanocomposite. In the case of

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation (DMR–MRSEC 05-20020 and DMR–IMR) and the Office of Naval Research (N00014-03-1-0890 and DURINT N00014-00-1-0720).

References (41)

  • P. Pötschke et al.

    Eur Polym J

    (2004)
  • J.K.W. Sandler et al.

    Polymer

    (2004)
  • C. Park et al.

    Chem Phys Lett

    (2002)
  • M Moniruzzaman et al.

    Polymer

    (2006)
  • M.J. O'Connell et al.

    Chem Phys Lett

    (2001)
  • P. Nikolaev et al.

    Chem Phys Lett

    (1999)
  • W. Zhou et al.

    Chem Phys Lett

    (2001)
  • R. Haggenmueller et al.

    Chem Phys Lett

    (2000)
  • A. Claye et al.

    Chem Phys Lett

    (2001)
  • M.A. Hamon et al.

    Chem Phys Lett

    (2001)
  • H. Hu et al.

    Chem Phys Lett

    (2001)
  • J.B. Bai et al.

    Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf

    (2003)
  • Z. Ounaies et al.

    Compos Sci Technol

    (2003)
  • J.K.W. Sandler et al.

    Polymer

    (2003)
  • M.S.P. Shaffer et al.

    Adv Mater

    (1999)
  • B. Safadi et al.

    J Appl Polym Sci

    (2002)
  • F. Du et al.

    J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys

    (2003)
  • D. Qian et al.

    Appl Phys Lett

    (2000)
  • R. Andrews et al.

    Macromol Mater Eng

    (2002)
  • W.D. Zhang et al.

    Macromolecules

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text