Common neurobiological and psychological underpinnings of gambling and substance-use disorders

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109847Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Gambling disorder (GD) and substance-use disorders (SUDs) often co-occur.

  • Transdiagnostic features (e.g., impulsivity) are shared by GD and SUDs.

  • Blunted striatal activation during reward anticipation is seen in GD and SUDs.

  • Unique features of GD and SUDs may relate to substance-related toxicities.

  • More research should translate biological understanding to treatment advances.

Abstract

Both psychological and neurobiological studies in gambling disorder have increased in the past 10–15 years. This review examines the current state of the literature, with a focus on recent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in gambling disorder. The review compares and contrasts findings across gambling and substance-use disorders. Additionally, features with arguably particular relevance to gambling disorder (e.g., “near-miss” processing) are described, as well as their relationship to choice behaviors. More broadly, the review informs on how these studies advance our understanding of brain-behavior relationships relating to decision-making and key features of addictive disorders.

Introduction

The application of neuroimaging to examine gambling disorder (GD) began approximately 20 years ago: the first decade of neuroimaging studies produced 5 original research investigations in this population. Since 2010, dozens of neuroimaging studies have examined neural processes in GD populations (this does not include hundreds of neuroimaging studies examining gambling-related tasks or other phenomena such as loss-chasing or risk-taking). In the past 5 years, there has been an increase not only in the number of neuroimaging studies in GD, but also a refinement in the cognitive constructs examined, as well as sophistication in the types of comparisons made. The current literature review examines recent findings in human GD studies using different neuroimaging methods with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The review focuses first on the construct of appetitive processing – one of the most researched GD areas. This review also appraises recent studies using clinical comparison groups and work examining the neurobiology of specific gambling feature, near-misses. The review also examines other neuroimaging modalities, namely structural-based studies as well as the application of repetitive transcranial magnetic imaging (rTMS) for GD treatment. The first author searched the literature for relevant manuscripts on the topic, and supplemented this approach with knowledge from abstracts and citations in relevant articles. The purpose of this literature review is to shed light on recent findings in GD and gambling neurobiology, but is not necessarily exhaustive.

The interest in using neuroimaging to study GD is multifold. First, it provides a means to understand brain mechanisms involved in this disorder. Second, as the first formal ‘non-substance’ or ‘behavioral’ addiction, GD has potential to clarify addiction risk factors by disentangling addiction mechanisms from drug-use confounds. Many features are shared between substance-based and non-substance-based addictive disorders including urges/craving, withdrawal and tolerance. Additionally, core concepts and transdiagnostic constructs including impulsivity and compulsivity show similar relationships with these disorders. While it is possible that brain alterations (both in function and structure) may occur as a consequence of disordered gambling, recent GD studies, through careful subgrouping of co-occurring drug use, are beginning to isolate brain changes that may relate uniquely to gambling from those that may relate to alcohol or polysubstance use (Zois et al., 2017). This is particularly relevant as other problematic behaviors, including internet gaming, binge-eating and compulsive sexual behaviors, are increasingly discussed and debated in the context of ‘behavioral addictions’(Fineberg et al., 2010; el-Guebaly et al., 2012; Leeman and Potenza, 2013; Fineberg et al., 2014; Long et al., 2015; Kessler et al., 2016; Kraus et al., 2016; Kuhn and Gallinat, 2016; Gentile et al., 2017; Hutson et al., 2018; Kowalewska et al., 2018; Vaccaro and Potenza, 2019; Brand et al., 2019).

With comparable features as substance-use disorders (SUDs; e.g., urges, tolerance, withdrawal), GD offers an important condition for understanding neural mechanisms, both shared and unique features. As such, non-substance-based addictions like GD may help delineate boundaries and overlaps in addiction-like features. Additionally, transitions from impulsive to compulsive behaviors may share neural substrates (el-Guebaly et al., 2012; Fineberg et al., 2010; Fineberg et al., 2014; Brand et al., 2019). A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of compulsivity-related neurocognitive performance in GD found deficits in specific subdomains of this construct (van Timmeren et al., 2018). In particular, on tasks assessing attentional set-shifting, such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST), individuals with GD demonstrate impairments in cognitive flexibility which are often additionally related to problem-gambling severity, gambling frequency and gambling urges (Leppink et al., 2016; van Timmeren et al., 2018). Neuroimaging studies in GD reveal alterations in prefrontal cortical areas during cognitive control including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex and the ventromedial/orbitofrontal cortex (Leppink et al., 2016). These alterations may express themselves as generalized compulsive propensities that could relate to difficulties in flexibly moving attention and in perseverative tendencies that maintain maladaptive gambling behaviors (van Timmeren et al., 2018). It has been proposed that greater dorsal striatal activity to some gambling-related cues may relate to an increased susceptibility to form action-outcome associations in GD populations (Balodis et al., 2012a, Balodis et al., 2012b). Combined with heightened impulsive tendencies well documented in GD populations, transitions to compulsive behaviors may be accelerated in this population; such impulsivity-compulsivity transitions represent an important future direction for disordered gambling research (Balodis et al., 2012a, Balodis et al., 2012b). Future studies should directly examine this possibility both in humans and animal models.

Early neuroimaging studies in GD examined gambling-related cue-reactivity, particularly in the context of reward-based decision-making. However, recent studies have examined arguably more specific GD cognitive constructs, such as anticipatory processing, near-misses and value-based decision-making. Additionally, current neuroimaging studies have directly compared clinical groups with addictive disorders, including evaluations not only with SUDs but also with other disorders of impulse control such as binge-eating disorder (BED) or food addiction. These direct comparisons are in line with research efforts to consider constructs beyond diagnostic boundaries and provide a deeper understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms of addiction. One study has contrasted disorders with phenotypically different behavioral patterns (Majuri et al., 2017), having implications for disorder conceptualization. In addition, study stimuli are also moving beyond monetary cues to include natural rewards such as food or erotic stimuli (Sescousse et al., 2013; Majuri et al., 2017). These studies have the potential to highlight alterations in generalized reward processing that may act as precursor or maintenance factors in GD. Some GD studies already suggest differential reward sensitivities at both the motivational and hedonic levels to natural rewards (e.g. food or erotic cues), which provide some indication of core pathophysiological mechanisms in behavioral addictions (Sescousse et al., 2013), and similar approaches have been applied successfully to other behaviors proposed to have addictive potential like problematic pornography viewing (Gola et al., 2017).

This review will highlight recent neuroimaging studies in GD, including relevant constructs and novel neuromodulation techniques under study in GD.

Section snippets

Appetitive processing studies: seemingly conflicting findings and ongoing discussions

To date, most neuroimaging studies in GD have focused on appetitive processing, in particular with monetary cues and rewards. Some of the first fMRI studies in GD involved cue-exposures using tasks that were successful in increasing ratings of gambling urges; however, neuroimaging findings have been seemingly mixed. Early studies reported relatively diminished striatal and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) recruitment (Potenza et al., 2003; Reuter et al., 2005; de Greck et al., 2010)

Moving beyond monetary/gambling cues

To date, few neuroimaging studies of GD have directly examined reactivity to non-monetary/gambling cues. These types of studies are important as they shed light on whether imbalances in cue reactivity may be driven by hypersensitivity to monetary cues or reduced sensitivity to other types of reward. This has implications for understanding developmental and maintenance factors in GD. One study applied a modified incentive delay task in which participants anticipated viewing gambling or erotic

MRI-based structural studies

Initial grey-matter volume studies in GD presented seemingly ambiguous findings. Several studies reported no differences with healthy control groups (van Holst et al., 2012a, van Holst et al., 2012b, van Holst et al., 2012c; Fuentes et al., 2015) or increased ventral striatum and prefrontal cortex volumes using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) (Koehler et al., 2015). A region-of-interest approach identified smaller amygdalar and hippocampal volumes in GD that were linked to behavioral-inhibition

Funding and acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Gambling Research Exchange of Ontario (GREO); the Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research; R01 DA019039 from the National Institutes of Health; the Connecticut Mental Health Center; and a Center of Excellence in Gambling Research Award from the National Center for Responsible Gaming.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors have no pertinent disclosures or conflict of interest. Over the past three years, Dr. Potenza has received financial support (to Yale or personally) for the following. He has consulted for and advised Game Day Data, Addiction Policy Forum, and Opiant Therapeutics; received research support from the Mohegan Sun Casino and the National Center for Responsible Gaming; consulted for or advised legal and gambling entities on issues related to impulse control and addictive behaviors;

References (97)

  • M.B. de Ruiter et al.

    Similar hyporesponsiveness of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in problem gamblers and heavy smokers during an inhibitory control task

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2012)
  • D. Fuentes et al.

    Mapping brain volumetric abnormalities in never-treated pathological gamblers

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2015)
  • A. Gay et al.

    A single session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the prefrontal cortex reduces cue-induced craving in patients with gambling disorder

    Eur. Psychiatry

    (2017)
  • R.Z. Goldstein et al.

    The neurocircuitry of impaired insight in drug addiction

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2009)
  • M. Grall-Bronnec et al.

    The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for modulating craving and addictive behaviours: a critical literature review of efficacy, technical and methodological considerations

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2014)
  • J.E. Grant et al.

    A proof of concept study of tolcapone for pathological gambling: relationships with COMT genotype and brain activation

    Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.

    (2013)
  • J. Hiser et al.

    The multifaceted role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in emotion, decision making, social cognition, and psychopathology

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2018 Apr 15)
  • A. Hone-Blanchet et al.

    Noninvasive brain stimulation to suppress craving in substance use disorders: review of human evidence and methodological considerations for future work

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2015)
  • P.H. Hutson et al.

    Binge-eating disorder: clinical and therapeutic advances

    Pharmacol. Ther.

    (2018)
  • J.M. Jansen et al.

    Effects of non-invasive neurostimulation on craving: a meta-analysis

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2013)
  • J. Joutsa et al.

    Mesolimbic dopamine release is linked to symptom severity in pathological gambling

    Neuroimage

    (2012)
  • A.S. Kayser et al.

    Right inferior frontal cortex activity correlates with tolcapone responsivity in problem and pathological gamblers

    Neuroimage Clin.

    (2017)
  • R.M. Kessler et al.

    The neurobiological basis of binge-eating disorder

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2016)
  • G.F. Koob

    Neurobiological substrates for the dark side of compulsivity in addiction

    Neuropharmacology

    (2009)
  • S. Kuhn et al.

    Neurobiological basis of Hypersexuality

    Int. Rev. Neurobiol.

    (2016)
  • E.W. Leppink et al.

    Cognitive flexibility correlates with gambling severity in young adults

    J. Psychiatr. Res.

    (2016)
  • M. Leyton et al.

    Striatal ups and downs: their roles in vulnerability to addictions in humans

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2013)
  • V. Menon

    Salience Network. Brain Mapping: an Encyclopedic Reference

    (2015)
  • M.N. Potenza

    The neural bases of cognitive processes in gambling disorder

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2014)
  • O. Rosenberg et al.

    Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of pathological gambling

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2013)
  • J.D. Steele et al.

    Segregation of cognitive and emotional function in the prefrontal cortex: a stereotactic meta-analysis

    Neuroimage

    (2004)
  • E.V. Sullivan et al.

    Striatal and forebrain nuclei volumes: contribution to motor function and working memory deficits in alcoholism

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • R.J. van Holst et al.

    A voxel-based morphometry study comparing problem gamblers, alcohol abusers, and healthy controls

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2012)
  • R.J. van Holst et al.

    Distorted expectancy coding in problem gambling: is the addictive in the anticipation?

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • T. van Timmeren et al.

    Compulsivity-related neurocognitive performance deficits in gambling disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2018)
  • P.D. Worhunsky et al.

    Altered neural correlates of reward and loss processing during simulated slot-machine fMRI in pathological gambling and cocaine dependence

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2014)
  • P.D. Worhunsky et al.

    Alterations in functional brain networks associated with loss-chasing in gambling disorder and cocaine-use disorder

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (2017)
  • Y.W. Yao et al.

    Functional and structural neural alterations in internet gaming disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2017)
  • S.W. Yip et al.

    Shared microstructural features of behavioral and substance addictions revealed in areas of crossing fibers

    Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging

    (2017)
  • M. Zack et al.

    Effects of high frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation and continuous Theta burst stimulation on gambling reinforcement, delay discounting, and Stroop interference in men with pathological gambling

    Brain Stimul.

    (2016)
  • I.M. Balodis et al.

    Relating neural processing of reward and loss prospect to risky decision-making in individuals with and without gambling disorder

    Int. Gambl. Stud.

    (2018)
  • K.C. Berridge et al.

    Liking, wanting, and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction

    Am. Psychol.

    (2016)
  • T.J. Beveridge et al.

    Review. Parallel studies of cocaine-related neural and cognitive impairment in humans and monkeys

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.

    (2008)
  • D.W. Black et al.

    A direct, controlled, blind family study of DSM-IV pathological gambling

    J. Clin. Psychiatry

    (2014)
  • M. Brand et al.

    Gaming disorder is a disorder due to addictive behaviors - evidence from behavioral and neuroscientific studies addressing cue-reactivity and craving, executive functions and decision-making

    Curr. Addict. Rep.

    (2019)
  • H.W. Chase et al.

    Gambling severity predicts midbrain response to near-miss outcomes

    J. Neurosci.

    (2010)
  • D.T. Chau et al.

    The neural circuitry of reward and its relevance to psychiatric disorders

    Curr. Psychiatry Rep.

    (2004)
  • J.S. Choi et al.

    Altered brain activity during reward anticipation in pathological gambling and obsessive-compulsive disorder

    PLoS One

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text