Research articleResponse of phytohormones and correlation of SAR signal pathway genes to the different resistance levels of grapevine against Plasmopara viticola infection
Introduction
Grapevine (Vitis spp.), an economically important and one of the most extensively grown plants worldwide, is susceptible to attacks by pathogens, including downy mildew. Downy mildew, which is caused by an obligate biotrophic oomycete, Plasmopara viticola (Berk. and Curtis) Berl & De Toni, is a common grapevine disease, widespread throughout the world. The economic and negative environmental impact of the disease necessitates formulation of alternative strategies, involving activation of plant’s innate defense system, against it. In recent years, detailed resistance mechanisms have been described in a few model species (Pieterse and Dicke, 2007). These mechanisms often involve a signal transduction cascade triggered by infection, which induces the resistance response. In one of these mechanisms, grapevine resistance is triggered by elicitation of its innate immunity.
Upon infection by pathogens, plants identify pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) through pattern recognition receptors (PRR) present on the plasma membrane, resulting in a PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) (Badel et al., 2002). Strong pathogens release effectors that can weaken the PTI in plant cells. This results in a resistance (R) protein-mediated activation of an effector-triggered immunity (ETI), which can promote the initiation of a hypersensitive response (HR) and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), as well as the expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes (Shamsul et al., 2012). Plant hormones play important roles as signaling molecules, during disease resistance. Several reports have confirmed the existence of plant immune responses as well as the involvement of salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and abscisic acid (ABA) in such responses (Vlot et al., 2009, Bari and Jones, 2009). Different plant hormone signals can trigger a series of physiological and metabolic processes in cells by regulating resistance-related genes and by initiating the corresponding immune responses (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008).
Plant resistance to biotrophic pathogens has been classically thought to be mediated through the SA signaling pathway (Loake and Grant, 2007). SA accumulation, as well as the coordinated expression of PR genes encoding small proteins with antimicrobial activity, is also necessary for the onset of Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) in plants. SAR is a plant immune response that establishes broad-spectrum resistance in tissues distant from the site of primary infection (Dong, 2004). When infected with pathogens, the SA levels in plants drastically increase, leading to the expression of PR genes. This increase in SA levels usually occurs through two pathways, which include the catalysis of chorismate by isochorismate synthase (ICS) and that of phenylalanine by phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL). EDS1 gene, which generally participates downstream of the R gene, can induce the initial accumulation of SA and elementary development of HR. Thereafter, it can function along with PAD4 (phytoalexin deficient 4) to induce further accumulation of SA (Tsuda et al., 2009). The accumulation of SA induces the activation of NPR1 (non-expresser of pathogenesis related gene 1), which is transferred inside the nucleus from the cytoplasm. NPR1 interacts with TGA, a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor in the nucleus, to induce downstream expression of the PR gene (Loake and Grant, 2007).
Recent completion of Vitis vinifera genome sequencing in a highly homozygous genotype and in a heterozygous grapevine variety has led to the identification of putative resistance genes and defense signaling elements (Borie et al., 2004). Transcriptomic analysis indicates that downy mildew resistance is mainly a post-infection phenomenon (Polesani et al., 2010), and emphasizes the importance of transcriptional reprogramming in both the resistant and susceptible genotypes in response to P. viticola inoculation (Polesani et al., 2010, Legay et al., 2011, Malacarne et al., 2011). Transcriptional changes associated with P. viticola infection of susceptible grapevines have been related to a weak defense response (Polesani et al., 2010) and to the establishment of a compatible interaction (Hayes et al., 2010, Gamm et al., 2011). The response of resistant genotypes has been characterized by strong and rapid transcriptional reprogramming of processes related to defense, signal transduction, and secondary metabolism, which are either not induced or induced to a lesser extent, in susceptible grapevines (Kortekamp, 2006, Figueiredo et al., 2012). In particular, downy mildew resistance has been correlated with enhanced expression of genes encoding PR proteins and enzymes of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and with specific modulation of signal transduction components and markers of HR in resistant grapevines (Malacarne et al., 2011, Figueiredo et al., 2012).
Given the pivotal role of SAR in plant defense, and to systematically analyze the changes in the process of the grapevine resistance to P. viticola, we chose six wild grapevine species with different resistance levels for our investigations. Since all V. vinifera cultivars are susceptible to P. viticola, the resistance needs to be introduced from other Vitis species. It is generally considered that Muscadine rotundifolia (a subgenus of Vitis) is completely immune to downy mildew, Chinese Vitis amurensis has considerable resistance, whereas V. vinifera has poor resistance. In the present study, we estimated the phytohormone content in different grape species with varying susceptibility to infection and resistance levels, to decipher their functions in resistance of the vines against downy mildew and to determine the phytohormone that is most important in plant immunity. To achieve this, we quantitatively analyzed the differential expression of pivotal genes in the SAR process in the above-mentioned grape species. Our study, therefore, provides a broad overview of the molecular events underlying the changes induced by P. viticola infection in susceptible and resistant grapevine species and will provide valuable candidate genes that could be used to develop commercial mildew-resistant grapevine plants.
Section snippets
Plant material and P. viticola inoculation
One-year-old grapevines with different levels of resistance against downy mildew, including V. vinifera, V. amurensis, and M. rotundifolia, were maintained in a greenhouse under a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod at 25 °C and 85% relative humidity. Two cultivars of each of the three species were used, namely V. vinifera Chardonnay and Cabernet, V. amurensis Shuanghong and Zuoshanyi, and M. rotundifolia Noble and Carlos.
A mix culture of P. viticola was obtained from a natural field population in
Observation of downy mildew symptoms in different grapevine species
The different species/cultivars of Vitis showed different levels of resistance or susceptibility to the inoculated P. viticola. After incubation with P. viticola for three days, the susceptible V. vinifera started to present slight ‘downy’ substance on the discs with quick sporulation and development of extensive hyphae observed at 8 dpi, without any obvious necrotic spots (Fig. 1 Va and Vb). Visible necrotic spots were observed at 5 dpi in the downy mildew resistant, oriental species,
Discussion
Phytohormones play a significant role in regulating plant’s responses to various biotic and abiotic stresses (Glazebrook, 2005). Considering the critical function of hormones in the resistance of plants to stresses, it is important to measure the changes in endogenous concentrations of these hormones at different stages of infection. In the present study, three different species of grapevines, M. rotundifolia, V. amurensis, and V. vinifera were inoculated with downy mildew pathogen, P. viticola
Contributions
LS, LJ and ZY: design and interpretation of all experiments.
LS, ZP and HG: carried out experimental work.
LS, WJ and ZY: wrote the manuscript.
HY: provided the branches of the Muscadine rotundifolia.
References (40)
NPR1, all things considered
J. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.
(2004)Plant defence: a new weapon in the arsenal
J. Curr. Biol.
(2002)- et al.
Comparison of histological and physiological responses to Phakopsora pachyrhizi in resistant and susceptible soybean
J. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.
(1980) Expression analysis of defence-related genes in grapevine leaves after inoculation with a host and a non-host pathogen
J. Plant Physiol. Biochem.
(2006)- et al.
Characterization of Plasmopara resistance in grapevine using in vitro plants
J. Plant Physiol.
(2003) - et al.
Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2ΔΔCT Method
J. Methods
(2001) - et al.
Salicylic acid in plant defence – the players and protagonists
J. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.
(2007) - et al.
STANDing strong, resistance proteins instigators of plant defence
J. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.
(2009) - et al.
Plant interactions with microbes and insects: from molecular mechanisms to ecology
J. Trends Plant Sci.
(2007) - et al.
Antagonistic interaction between abscisic acid and jasmonate–ethylene signaling pathways modulates defense gene expression and disease resistance in Arabidopsis
J. Plant Cell.
(2004)
OIV Descriptor List for Grapevine Varieties and Vitis Species
A gene in the Pseudomonas syringaepv. tomato Hrp pathogenicity island conserved effector locus, hopPtoA1, contributes to efficient formation of bacterial colonies in planta and is duplicated elsewhere in the genome
J. Mol. Plant Microb. Interact.
Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses
J. Plant Mol. Biol.
Innate immunity in plants: an arms race between pattern recognition receptors in plants and effectors in microbial pathogens
J. Sci.
Resveratrol and stilbene synthase mRNA production in grapevine leaves treated with biotic and abiotic phytoalexin elicitors
J. Am. J. Enol. Vitic.
Different susceptibility of European grapevine cultivars for downy mildew
J. Vitis
The Arabidopsis NPR1 disease resistance protein is a novel cofactor that confers redox regulation of DNA binding activity to the basic domain/leucine zipper transcription factor TGA1
J. Plant Cell
Systemic acquired resistance
J. Annu. Rev. Plant Pathol.
Cultivar-specific kinetics of gene induction during downy mildew early infection in grapevine
J. Funct. Integr. Genom.
Changes in carbohydrate metabolism in Plasmopara viticola infected grapevine leaves
J. Mol. Plant Microb. Interact.
Cited by (34)
Grapevine defence mechanisms when challenged by pathogenic fungi and oomycetes
2024, Advances in Botanical ResearchScPNP-A, a plant natriuretic peptide from Stellera chamaejasme, confers multiple stress tolerances in Arabidopsis
2020, Plant Physiology and BiochemistryDowny mildew resistance identification and SSR molecular marker screening of different grape germplasm resources
2019, Scientia HorticulturaeCitation Excerpt :Therefore, efforts should be made to further verify the exact role of PAD4 and EDS1 in the grapevine defense pathway. Moreover, ICS2 showed high expression levels in the R strain Yingyu-Linxian and I strain Pride, and TGA4 was also highly expressed in Pride, which was in accordance with the study by Liu et al. (2016), who demonstrated that ICS2 and TGA4 showed high expression levels in the HR strain Yunnan-Yuanmou 2. The research presented by Merz et al. (2015) showed that WRKY33 could significantly improve the DM resistance of the susceptible variety Syrah.
Chlorogenic acid induces resistance against Penicillium expansum in peach fruit by activating the salicylic acid signaling pathway
2018, Food ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Whereas, the different regulatory effects of these two SA biosynthetic pathways on plants resistance induced by CGA need further investigation. NPR1 is a key transcription factor downstream of SA, which promotes translocation of NPR1 into the nucleus from the cytoplasm (Liu et al., 2016). Overexpression of the NPR1 gene resulted in citrus with normal phenotypes that had the potential to enhance the disease resistance to Huanglongbing (Dutt, Barthe, Irey & Grosser, 2016).