Elsevier

Plant Science

Volume 166, Issue 1, January 2004, Pages 179-190
Plant Science

The expression of LESK1 morphogenetic marker along the tomato hypocotyl axis is linked to a position-dependent competence for shoot regeneration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.09.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Somatic morphogenesis is an important process whose mechanisms are still not completely understood. This is partially due to the lack of reliable morphogenetic markers that identify the different stages of the process. In the present work, a fragment of LESK1 gene (Lycopersicon esculentum shoot kinase 1) has been utilized as a marker of somatic caulogenesis. The expression of this marker pointed out a particular abundance of the corresponding transcript in tomato hypocotyls from 8-day-old plantlets. This elevated expression underlines the particular attitude to regeneration of this organ. Hypocotyl explants can in fact regenerate in the absence of exogenous growth regulators giving rise to shoot and root production at the apical and basal ends, respectively. The polarization observed in morphogenesis is always associated with polarized expression of LESK1 gene, which is elevated at the top of the explants, where shoot production occurs, and low at the basal pole, where roots were observed. A non-homogeneous LESK1 expression was also found along the hypocotyl axis where apparently marks cell populations with different competence to caulogenesis. These different levels of competence may be due to a variation in cell sensitivity to growth regulators, or the reaching of a well determined hormonal ratio required by the cells to be driven toward caulogenesis. LESK1 represents a reliable marker probably linked to the acquisition of competence for somatic caulogenesis.

Introduction

The mechanisms ruling somatic morphogenesis are conceivably very similar to those operating in the whole plant when, for instance, a traumatic event (such as wounding or cutting) induces the plant to regenerate new organs. The process takes place in cells that are already competent for morphogenesis (in function of the age or the developmental stage of the tissue they belong to) [1], or that acquire competence upon a triggering treatment such as the presence of particular nutrients [2], growth regulators [3], [4] or light [5]. After competence acquisition the cells become able to perceive the stimuli altering their developmental commitment, and are liable to induction in the presence of the appropriate stimulus that leads to organ determination [1], [3], [6], [7]. The subsequent phases involve cellular division, which leads to the formation of new meristems and to the development of new vascular structures, tissues, and organs, under the control of an efficient cell-to-cell communication. The complex network of biochemical and molecular pathways involved in the perception and transduction of all the regulatory signals mentioned, relies on the induction of specific genes whose activation is often spatially and transiently regulated and that can be considered markers of a determined phase of the developmental process. In recent years it has been found that many genes are involved in the acquisition of competence for cell division [8] or shoot induction [9], in the development of the vascular system [10], as well as in ruling and maintaining determined meristems [11], [12], [13], [14], [15].

The study and characterization of these genes could greatly improve the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the different phases of in vitro morphogenesis and could consequently provide support in improving the effectiveness of this complex process (from the choice of explant source to the choice of culture conditions), as it is often tackled from a merely empirical point of view.

In a former study aimed at identifying the genes involved in somatic morphogenesis, from tomato cotyledons induced to produce shoots we isolated a cDNA clone (G36) 487 bp long [16] that exhibits the typical features of a morphogenetic marker. The expression of G36 gene is growth regulator dependent and is strongly enhanced in tomato cotyledons by means of the appropriate auxin/cytokinin ratio leading to somatic caulogenesis. In the present work, the screening of a cDNA library allowed us to isolate a longer cDNA clone containing the sequence of G36. This cDNA clone is highly homologous to many plant serine/threonine kinases, and thus it has been renamed LESK1 (Lycopersicon esculentum shoot kinase 1). In order to confirm the reliability of the LESK1 gene as molecular marker we have assessed its expression in various tissues with different regenerating capabilities. Our attention was focused on tomato hypocotyl. These explants, without supply of exogenous growth regulators, produce shoots and roots at the two ends showing a polarization in morphogenesis that fairly reproduces what occurs in the cuttings and represents a very suitable instrument for the study of in vitro morphogenesis.

Section snippets

Plant material

Tomato seeds (L. esculentum Mill. var. Alice) were sown and germinated under sterile conditions for 8 or 40 days, as described previously [17].

In vitro culture of excised hypocotyls

Hypocotyls from 8-day-old plantlets, with an average length of 4–5 cm, were cut into 1 cm long segments. The explants, derived from the entire hypocotyl axis, were cultured on MS medium [18] containing 0.8% agar and 30 g l−1 sucrose, at 25 °C and 90 μmol m−2 s−1 light intensity (16 h photoperiod).

In a first set of experiments, the explants were cultured in a

Identification of a cDNA clone containing the sequence of the marker of somatic caulogenesis G36

The G36 fragment was initially identified by mRNA Differential Display [16] as part of a gene specifically expressed during somatic morphogenesis in tomato cotyledons. No sequence related to G36 was initially identified in the databases, and therefore the identity and function of the corresponding protein were unknown.

The screening of a cDNA library, obtained from 8-day BZ-treated cotyledons, has allowed us, up to now, to isolate a single clone 2010 bp long containing the G36 sequence (dbEST

Discussion

From the data reported herein, we can draw some conclusions.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. A. Scott-Monkhouse for her linguistic revision of the manuscript. The research was supported by MIUR (Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca).

References (54)

  • K. Finstad et al.

    Characterization of competence during induction of somatic embryogenesis in alfalfa tissue culture

    Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult.

    (1993)
  • L. Bertram et al.

    Phytocrome A and phytocrome B1 control the acquisition of competence for shoot regeneration in tomato hypocotyls

    Plant Cell Rep.

    (2000)
  • A.S. Hemerly et al.

    cdc2a expression in Arabidopsis is linked with competence for cell division

    Plant Cell

    (1993)
  • H. Banno et al.

    Overexpression of Arabidopsis ESR1 induces initiation of shoot regeneration

    Plant Cell

    (2001)
  • T. Demura et al.

    Novel vascular cell-specific genes whose expression is regulated temporally and spatially during vascular system development

    Plant Cell

    (1994)
  • E.S. Coen et al.

    The war of the whorls: genetic interaction controlling flower development

    Nature

    (1991)
  • E.S. Coen et al.

    Evolution of floral symmetry

    Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B.

    (1995)
  • K. Lynn et al.

    The PINHEAD/ZWILLE gene acts pleiotropically in Arabidopsis development and has overlapping functions with the ARGONAUTE1 gene

    Development

    (1999)
  • K.R. Siegfried et al.

    Members of the YABBY gene family specify abaxial cell fate in Arabidopsis

    Development

    (1999)
  • A. Torelli et al.

    New potential markers of in vitro tomato morphogenesis identified by mRNA differential display

    Plant Mol. Biol.

    (1996)
  • C. Branca et al.

    Auxin structure and activity on tomato morphogenesis in vitro and pea stem elongation

    Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult.

    (1991)
  • T. Murashige et al.

    A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures

    Physiol. Plant

    (1962)
  • C. Branca et al.

    Early phases in in vitro culture of tomato cotyledons: starch accumulation and protein pattern in relation to the hormonal treatment

    Protoplasma

    (1994)
  • T. Vitali et al.

    Attività fitotossica dell’acido 1,2-benzisotiazol-3-ilacetico

    Bull. Soc. It. Biol. Sper.

    (1971)
  • J. Sambrook, E.F. Fritsch, T. Maniatis, Electrophoresis of RNA through gels containing formaldehyde, in: Molecular...
  • J. Sambrook, E.F. Fritsch, T. Maniatis, Screening of cDNA libraries, in: Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual, Cold...
  • F. Souazè et al.

    Quantitative RT-PCR: limits and accuracy

    BioTechniques

    (1996)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Approaching the genetic dissection of indirect adventitious organogenesis process in tomato explants

      2021, Plant Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has been reported that the expression level of MAPK change significantly in response to hormone treatments [41], implying that some mitogen-activated protein kinases could act as intermediaries for the organogenic response in explant cells through the transduction of signals from an adequate combination of growth regulators and other components of the culture medium. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that LESK1, a gene encoding a putative serine/threonine kinase, which is located on a different chromosome than SlMAPKKK17, was proposed as a marker of the competence phase of organogenic response in hypocotyl and cotyledon explants of tomato [22,23]. As far as we know, no functional analysis of this gene has been reported but these interesting results point to the involvement of some of these proteins in the organogenic response in tomato tissue cultures.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Center for Molecular Genetics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093-0634, USA.

    View full text