Elsevier

Physics Letters A

Volume 382, Issue 37, 22 September 2018, Pages 2662-2665
Physics Letters A

Entangled trajectories during ionization of an H atom driven by n-cycle laser pulse

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2018.06.024Get rights and content

Highlights

  • For a two-cycle laser pulse, the entangled trajectory is simple compared with that for a four-cycle laser pulse.

  • For two-cycle or four-cycle pulses, the influence of the quantum force is more distinct than that of the classical force.

  • The final kinetic energy of the entangled trajectories is slightly higher than that obtained by the classical calculation.

  • The convergence of the trajectory equations is checked.

Abstract

We study the ionization of an H atom in a linearly polarized laser field with different optical cycle numbers by calculating the entangled trajectories in phase space. The results indicate that, for a two-cycle laser pulse, the entangled trajectory is simple owing to the simple laser electric distribution. As the number of optical cycles increases, the complexity of the laser electric field distribution, and subsequently, that of the entangled trajectories increase. From these entangled trajectories, re-scattering ionization can be observed. Further, we investigate the effect of quantum force on trajectories by comparing them with classical trajectories. We find that for few-cycle laser pulses (np=2 and 4), the effect of the quantum force is more distinct than classical behavior, whereas for longer laser pulses (np=6 and 8), it is quite similar to the classical behavior. Because of the quantum force, the final kinetic energy is slightly higher than that obtained by classical calculation. The different initial positions have some influence on the individual trajectories, but the individual trajectories still keep similar configuration to the mean trajectories.

Introduction

Interaction between atoms or molecules and few-cycle laser pulses can result in many fundamental strong-field physics phenomena such as above-threshold ionization (ATI), high harmonic generation (HHG), and non-sequential double ionization (NSDI) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Ionized electrons from atoms and molecules in a few-cycle pulsed laser field are emitted in direct ionization or are pulled back by the laser field when the laser electric field changes direction. The ionized electrons can carry information about the laser field and the electronic structure of the atoms or molecules. For example, Milošević et al. observed and measured the carrier-envelope (CE) phase of a laser pulse through the strong left-right asymmetry of the emitted electrons[9], [10]. Paulus et al. investigated the ionization of an H atom exposed to an intense few-cycle laser pulse by calculating the left-right asymmetry of the photoelectron momentum distributions, and they found an asymmetry parameter as a function of laser intensity for a particular CE phase range [11]. The results reported by Morishita et al. implied that existing few-cycle infrared lasers can be implemented for the ultrafast imaging of transient molecules with a temporal resolution of a few femtoseconds [12]. Huismans et al. formulated a new method to record the underlying electron dynamics on a sub-laser-cycle timescale, enabling photoelectron spectroscopy with a temporal resolution using the holographic structures of the ionization of a Xe atom [13]. Few-cycle laser pulses are characterized by parameters such as the frequency and intensity of the laser electric field, CE phase, and number of optical cycles. The effect of frequency and intensity on ionization has been reported. The actual shape of a few-cycle pulse crucially depends on the number of optical cycles, and so does the physical processes. In our earlier studies [14], [15], we investigated the ionization behaviors of an H atom in a few-cycle pulse with different optical cycle numbers and found that photoelectron angular distributions exhibit energy-dependent phenomena for different ATI peaks, and ionization behaviors of the atom extend to those of an atom in an infinitely monochromatic plane wave when the optical cycle numbers are very large.

Theoretical calculations for interactions between atoms or molecules and intense few-cycle laser pulses are typically carried out using different methods. The main theoretical approaches can be divided into two groups: the first kind is the direct integration of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE), or the Bohmian formulation basing on the TDSE [16], and the second kind is analytical theory, such as the Keldysh–Faisal–Reiss (KFR) model [17], [18], [19], the analytical R-matrix method [20], [21]. In addition to the above methods, many people have used the Wigner function to investigate the ionization of atoms or molecules in strong laser field [22], [23], [24]. The Wigner function [25], [26], [27], [28] is a quasiprobability function in phase space that allows one to study position-momentum correlations. These correlations give a physical interpretation of the emergence of the above-threshold-ionization (ATI) energy spectrum. The Wigner function enables us to show the dependence of ionization probability on time and explicitly demonstrates the transition of the ionization process. In this study, we follow the approach of our recent work [22], however, we do not seek further detailed improvements on this approach. We perform comprehensive calculations of the entangled trajectories of the electrons which have been ionized irrespective of the ionization mechanism (tunneling ionization or over barrier ionization). From these trajectories, we can investigate the effect of the optical cycle number on entangled trajectories. Further, we demonstrate the effect of quantum force on the trajectories by comparing them with classical trajectories.

This paper is arranged as follows: we introduce the Wigner function used in this paper in Sec. 2 The results and discussions are in Sec. 3. In Sec. 4 we conclude.

Section snippets

Theoretical methods

Under the dipole approximation, using the minimal-coupling Hamiltonian the Schrödinger equation describing the interaction between an atom and a laser field is{[iħ+eA(t)]22me+Uc(x)}Ψ(x,t)=iħΨ(x,t)t, where A(t) is the vector potential of the laser field. And Uc(r) is the atomic Coulomb potential, which has many different models for H atom. In the early study, Loudon [29] had used the model potential, 1/|x|, to investigate the energy-level degeneracy because of the potential singularity,

Numerical results and discussion

As for the laser field we assume that it is linearly polarized along the x axis throughout this paper, and the electric field amplitude E=0.08 a.u. (a.u. means the atomic units), and corresponds to the laser peak intensity of I=1.126×1014 W/cm2, with the carrier-envelope phase, ϕ, is zero. The laser pulse shape isE(t)=E0sech(ttf/2πω)sin(ωt+ϕ), where E0 is the amplitude of the electric field of the laser pulse, and tf=npT. np is the number of laser pulse cycle. ϕ is the carrier-envelope phase.

Conclusions

We have studied the ionization of an H atom driven by a linearly polarized laser with different numbers of optical cycles in phase space by calculating the entangled trajectories. First, we have checked the convergence of the trajectory equations, and then calculated the mean trajectories of 500 trajectories with quantum force term and the mean classical trajectories. We have found that for a two-cycle laser pulse, the entangled trajectory is simple, and it indicates direct ionization. For a

Acknowledgements

Project supported the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11104167, 11374191) and the natural science fund of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2015AM020), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2014M561911).

References (40)

  • X.H. Ren et al.

    Opt. Commun.

    (2017)
  • T. Brabec et al.

    Rev. Mod. Phys.

    (2000)
  • M.T. Stephan et al.

    Phys. Rev. A

    (2015)
  • J.G. Chen et al.

    Phys. Rev. A

    (2015)
  • K.J. Yuan et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2013)
  • M. Drescher et al.

    Nature (London)

    (2002)
  • A. Baltuška et al.

    Nature (London)

    (2003)
  • D.B. Milošević et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2002)
  • L. Torlina et al.

    Nat. Phys.

    (2015)
  • D.B. Milošević et al.

    Opt. Express

    (2003)
  • P.J.M. Christian et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2006)
  • N.I. Shvetsov-Shilovski et al.

    Phys. Rev. A

    (2014)
  • T. Morishita et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2008)
  • Y. Huismans et al.

    Science

    (2011)
  • X.H. Ren et al.

    Eur. Phys. J. D

    (2017)
  • P. Botheron et al.

    Phys. Rev. A

    (2010)
  • L.V. Keldysh

    Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.

    (1964)
  • F.H.M. Faisal

    J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys.

    (1973)
  • H.R. Reiss

    Phys. Rev. A

    (1980)
  • L. Torlina et al.

    Phys. Rev. A

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text