ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena
Volume 215, Issue 2, 15 March 2006, Pages 117-126
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (1533 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.physd.2006.02.004    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

An analysis of intermittency, scaling, and surface renewal in atmospheric surface layer turbulence

Gabriel Katula, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Amilcare Porporatob, Daniela Cavac and Mario Siqueiraa

aNicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Box 90328, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0328, USA bDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Box 90287 Hudson Hall, Durham, NC 27708-0287, USA cCNR-Institute of Atmosphere Sciences and Climate Section of Lecce, Lecce, Italy

Received 22 May 2005; 
revised 31 January 2006; 
accepted 7 February 2006. 
Communicated by C.K.R.T. Jones. 
Available online 24 March 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Turbulent velocity and scalar concentration time series were collected in the atmosphere above an ice sheet, a mesic grassland, and a temperate pine forest, thereby encompassing a wide range of roughness conditions encountered in nature. Intermittency and scaling properties of such series were then analyzed using Tsallis’s non-extensive thermostatistics. While theoretical links between the Tsallis’s non-extensive thermostatistics and Navier–Stokes turbulence remain questionable, the Tsallis distribution (a special interpretation of Student’s t-distribution) provides a unifying framework to investigate two inter-connected problems: similarity between scalars and velocity statistics within the inertial subrange and “contamination” of internal intermittency by “external” factors. In particular, we show that “internal” intermittency models, including the She–Leveque, Lognormal, and Log-stable, reproduce the observed Tsallis parameters well for velocities within the inertial subrange, despite the differences in surface roughness conditions, but fail to describe the fluctuations for the scalars (e.g., air temperature CO2 and water vapor). Such scalars appear more intermittent than velocity when the underlying surface is a large source or sink. The dissimilarity in statistics between velocity and scalars within the inertial subrange is shown to be strongly dependent on “external” intermittency. The genesis of “external” intermittency for scalars is linked to the classical Higbie surface renewal process and scalar source strength. Surface renewal leads to a ramp-like pattern in the scalar concentration (or temperature) time series with a gradual increase (rise-phase) associated with sweeping motion from the atmosphere onto the surface or into the canopy and a sharp drop associated with an ejection phase from the surface (or the canopy) back into the atmosphere. The duration of the rise-phase is on the order of the integral time scale, while the duration of the ejection phase is much shorter and is shown to impact the distributional tails at the small scales. Implications for “scalar turbulence” models are also discussed in the context of biosphere–atmosphere CO2 exchange.

Keywords: Antartica; Grassland; Pine forest; Atmosphere turbulence; Intermittency; Scalar transfer; Surface renewal; Tsallis statistics

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Theory
3. Data
4. Results and discussion
4.1. Tsallis parameters and measured data
4.2. Similarity in scalar-velocity statistics
4.3. Higbie’s surface renewa1: A link between external and internal intermittency
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References










 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.