Ferromagnetic superconductors
Introduction
The search for ferromagnetic superconductors dates from before the 1960s. Early attempts were made by alloying solid solutions that contained superconductors and ferromagnets as end members, such a (Ce–Gd) Ru2 [1]. The failure to find any co-existence of the two phenomena, supported the conclusion that conventional singlet superconductivity is incompatible with the strong exchange fields that align spins in a ferromagnet and the two orders are in competition. In the following decades, by choosing the Curie temperature to be much lower than the superconducting transition temperature the competition was brought to a balance and a type of co-existence induced. This was extensively explored in Chevrel phase and borocarbide compounds [2], [3], [4], [5]. Even in this case the resulting state was found to be non-uniform; both the superconductivity and magnetism are modulated such that their order-parameters oscillate out of phase to reduce their spatial overlap. A theoretical mechanism for the modulation based on a how the superconducting gap affects the susceptibility was given by Anderson and Suhl [6]. A different explanation based on a Ginzburg–Landau theory purporting closer agreement with experiment was later developed by Blount and Varma [7]. In these materials the magnetic order is clearly associated with local moments, while the conduction electrons carry superconductivity.
A few experimental cases of homogeneous bulk uniform co-existence did emerge from these studies, although extremely fragile. In one case, found in AuIn2, the nuclear moments order ferromagnetically but are so weakly coupled with the electrons that the superconductivity survives [8]. In a second, a fragile metastable co-existence of homogenous ferromagnetism with superconductivity in the Chevrel phase HoMo6S8 was demonstrated [9]. The conclusion from these studies is that although it is possible to have conventional singlet superconductivity in ferromagnets, such states are limited to cases where the ferromagnetism is weak with . The Pauli-limited critical field for superconductivity also has to be larger than the exchange field.
Pairing electrons in a triplet configuration to avoid the Pauli limit appears to offer the only possibility to obtain superconductivity with . The anti-symmetry of fermions under exchange then requires that the order parameter has odd parity. This in turn requires that the pairing interaction has a strong q-dependence on the scale of the Fermi-wavevector. Phonon mediated interactions are inherently short range (their range is set by Thomas Fermi screening) and appear incapable of providing an interaction of the correct form under most circumstances. Magnetic interactions provide an alternative to phonons [10], [11], analogous to the pairing mechanism for atoms realised in superfluid 3He [12]. Close to a ferromagnetic quantum critical point where ferromagnetism is suppressed, low energy long wavelength magnetic excitations are expected to be prevalent and have an appropriate wavelength dependence. This motivated searches for magnetically mediated superconductivity in a number of weak or incipient itinerant ferromagnets.
The search for a superconducting analogue to the superfluidity in 3He resulted in the discovery of superconductivity deep in the ferromagnetic state in UGe2 [13], the first uniform ferromagnetic superconductor with . This was followed by the observation of superconductivity in URhGe [14] and in an isostructural isoelectronic material UCoGe [15], although the latter only just satisfies . To date these are the only fully established examples of ferromagnetic superconductors with .
Before restricting our discussion to the above three materials, we briefly mention three other materials where co-existence of bulk ferromagnetism and superconductivity with has been claimed. (i) The itinerant ferromagnet ZrZn2 with created some excitement in 2001 when superconductivity was reported in high-quality crystals. However superconductivity was later shown to be limited to a layer at the sample surface that had been modified by spark-erosion [16]. (ii) For compounds with formula in the range Y4Co3–Y9Co7 superconductivity and very weak ferromagnetism with was reported as long ago as 1980. These compounds have a complex structure with a partially occupied Co site (hence the composition range) located in 1D channels [17]. The evidence for superconductivity is clear cut, but the case for bulk homogeneous ferromagnetism is less clear. It is suggested that the ferromagnetism is sensitive to the precise Co positions in the channels [18] and experimentally it is absent in better ordered samples [19]. Most work has been done on polycrystals with the exception of structural studies made on very small single crystals. The available evidence points to the superconductivity being conventional. (iii) UIr was discovered to be superconducting in a narrow pressure range with [20] just below the pressure at which ferromagnetism is suppressed. There are a succession of magnetic transitions with pressure and the phase supporting superconductivity (called “FM3”) is possibly only present at low temperature in experiments with a non-hydrostatic pressure medium [21]. The low temperature moment has not been measured at the same pressure as superconductivity is observed, but at lower pressure in FM3 it is very small () [22]. The upper critical field for superconductivity is and the highest superconducting fraction reported is <20% [22]. The bulk coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity is therefore not fully established. However, non-fermi-liquid power laws for the temperature dependence of the resistivity suggest that quantum criticality may be relevant to the pairing mechanism and the fact that the superconductivity is found close to a transition between competing magnetic states resembles UGe2. Unlike UGe2, URhGe and UCoGe the structure of UIr does not have inversion symmetry. In the following we focus on only UGe2, URhGe and UCoGe where the evidence for bulk co-existence in the best quality samples is clear.
It is surprising that so few ferromagnetic superconductors are known, now 15 years after the discovery of superconductivity in UGe2. Although UGe2, URhGe and UCoGe have some obvious points in common, they are also distinct from each other in important ways. Each is also amenable to different experimental probes. This review begins with a general review of the common traits of the three materials before discussing each in turn. The main theme of the review is the identification of the mechanism and special circumstances required to achieve superconductivity in ferromagnets. Other recent reviews include [23], [24], [25], [26]. This review is of experimental work and only limited reference is made to theory.
Section snippets
Magnetic properties
All the above ferromagnetic superconductors have an orthorhombic structure. Several of their normal state, magnetic and superconducting properties are listed in Table 1. They all contain uranium and are ‘heavy-fermions’ with moderately high effective mass. The enhanced effective mass in the ferromagnetic state is noteworthy, since the Kondo mechanism usually invoked as the origin of an enhanced mass might be expected to be suppressed by the exchange field below . Understanding how a heavy
Overview of magnetic phase diagram
UCoGe has the same structure as URhGe. The ferromagnetic moment is in the same initial direction (along the c-axis) and Co is directly above Rh in the periodic table. In URhGe the Curie temperature 9.5 K (in zero field) is connected by a phase transition line with the rotation transition at 11.8 T and 0 K (for field in the plane perpendicular to the c-axis; this is clearly visible in magnetic measurements and transport, Fig. 7). For UCoGe there are two distinct features. There is a change of slope
Summary
It is clear that different probes have been applied successfully on each material limited by the challenges each poses; the need for pressure for UGe2, the lack of large high quality crystals for URhGe and the need for the field direction to be aligned at a level approaching the crystal mosaic for field studies of UCoGe.
It is tempting to make the case that superconductivity in the three materials share a common mechanism. The superconductivity has some common phenomena. The large transverse
Acknowledgement
Support from the EPSRC (UK) is acknowledged.
References (87)
- et al.
Solid State Commun.
(1977) - et al.
Physica C
(1996) - et al.
Phys. Rev. B
(1980) - et al.
Phys. Rev. B
(2001) - et al.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
(2002) - et al.
J. Phys. Condens. Matter
(2002) - et al.
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
(2009) - et al.
Phys. Rev. B
(2008) - et al.
PRL
(1958) - et al.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
(1977)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Rev.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
J. Low Temp. Phys.
Physica B
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Rev. B
Nature
Nature
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Rev. B
Phys. Rev. B
J. Phys. F: Met. Phys.
J. Phys. F. Met. Phys.
J. Phys.: Cond. Matter
Phys. Rev. B
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
Rev. Mod. Phys.
Phys. Soc. Jpn.
Phys. Soc. Jpn.
C.R. Phys.
PRL
Phys. Rev. B
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
Science
Phys. Rev. B
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Nat. Phys.
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
Phys. Rev. B
Phys. Rev. B
Phys. Rev. B
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Cited by (55)
Uranium-based superconducting materials
2019, Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare EarthsCitation Excerpt :If we now examine solid-state materials, which exhibit unconventional superconductivity, a particular focus falls on systems containing lanthanide and actinide elements. Besides unconventional superconductivity, a wide range of co-existing phenomena is frequently observed: complex magnetic orders [5,42–46], coexistence of superconductivity and magnetism [18,47,48], enhanced effective electron masses [39,49–53], topological states [54–58], as well as quantum criticality [19,59–63]. All of these peculiar are thought to arise from a degree to which electrons are itinerant or localized [64,65].
Multiple localized-itinerant dualities in magnetism of 5f electron systems: The case of UPt2Si2
2024, Physical Review MaterialsMetamagnetic transition in the two f orbitals Kondo lattice model
2023, Journal of Physics Condensed MatterThree-dimensional charge density wave in the dual heavy fermion system UPt2Si2
2023, Physical Review B