Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Effects of chronic mild stress on sexual behavior, locomotor activity and consumption of sucrose and saccharine solutions
Received 13 October 2004;
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.
Abstract
Many symptoms of human depressive disorders are also observed in animals after exposure to unpredictable stressors. The chronic mild stress (CMS) paradigm was developed in order to better model the human situation by using chronic mild stressors over a longer period. It is claimed that the model induces anhedonia in the animals, a core symptom of depression in humans. Despite the fact that the CMS model has a high degree of face validity, there are a number of laboratories in which the establishment of the model is less reliably observed. We have examined behavior (sexual activity and open field activity) together with hedonic measures (sucrose and saccharine intake) after exposure to CMS. CMS decreased male sexual activity (e.g. reduced capability to ejaculate) and increased activity in an open field test. The hedonic measures showed diverging results after CMS in our laboratory. Sucrose consumption was reduced, while saccharine consumption did not show a comparable change. It is concluded that CMS induces comparable alterations to some depression-like symptoms in humans. Saccharine consumption is not a reliable indicator of the hedonic responsiveness to CMS.
Keywords: Animal model of depression; Chronic mild stress; Sucrose intake; Saccharine intake; Sexual activity; Open field behavior
Article Outline
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Materials and methods
- 2.1. Ethical evaluation
- 2.2. Animal handling
- 2.3. Grouping
- 2.4. Stress procedure
- 2.5. Sexual behavior
- 2.6. Open field test
- 2.7. Sucrose intake, saccharine intake and body weight
- 2.8. Statistics
- 3. Results
- 3.1. Sucrose intake and bodyweight
- 3.2. Saccharin intake
- 3.3. Sexual activity
- 3.4. Open field behavior
- 4. Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References







E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (21)






p<0.05, one-tailed t-tests compared to Control rats.