Economic thermodynamics

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126261Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Economic thermodynamics as a phenomenological theory is developed.

  • The economic meaning of internal energy and temperature in economics is established.

  • Economic thermodynamics allows a natural description of inflation.

  • The thermodynamic conditions of market equilibrium stability are derived.

  • Le Chatelier’s principle is considered as applied to economic systems.

Abstract

A thermodynamic approach to the description of economic systems and processes is developed. It is shown that there is a deep analogy between the parameters of thermodynamic and economic systems (markets); so each thermodynamic parameter can be associated with a certain economic parameter or indicator. The economic meaning of such primordially thermodynamic concepts as internal energy and temperature has been established. It is shown that many economic laws, which in economic theory are a generalization of the results of observations, or are based on the analysis of the psychology of the behavior of market actors, within the framework of economic thermodynamics can be obtained as the natural and formal results of the theory. In particular, we show that economic thermodynamics allows a natural description of such a phenomenon as inflation. The thermodynamic conditions of market equilibrium stability are derived and analyzed, as well as the Le Chatelier’s principle as applied to economic systems.

Introduction

In recent decades, the understanding has come that the methods and theories developed in relation to physical systems can be successfully used to description of the systems outside physics, consisting of a large number of interacting elements. In such systems, specific mechanisms of interaction of elements become secondary, while certain collective properties come to the fore, which do not depend on the nature of the system, and should be the same for both physical and non-physical systems. It is these collective properties that determine the behavior of such systems as a whole.

An example of this is the application of the methods of thermodynamics and thermostatistics to the description of economic systems and processes, despite the fact that economics, as a theory, is fundamentally different from theories in physics, primarily in terms of its structure and principles of construction [1].

The methods of thermodynamics and thermostatistics as applied to the description of economic systems and processes were considered in papers [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. So in works [2], [3], [9], [10], [11], [17], [19], [20], analogs of the first and second laws of thermodynamics are introduced and analyzed in relation to economic systems. The economic analog of the Carnot cycle is considered in works [2], [3], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. In works [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [19], [20], a new (for economics) quantitative indicator, temperature, is introduced and its economic meaning is discussed. The law of increasing entropy as applied to economic processes was apparently first discussed in [18]. In works [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [9], [12], [13], [15], [16], [17], [20], various economic systems and processes are analyzed by methods of statistical physics and the connection of economic temperature with probability distributions of wealth and income has been shown.

At the same time, it should be noted that in the cited works, thermodynamic methods and thermodynamic terminology were often used intuitively and formally, at the level of external analogies, without strict theoretical justification.

In work [19], we have shown that thermodynamics of markets can be constructed as a phenomenological theory, by analogy with how it is done in physics.

In particular, proceeding from general principles, we showed [19] that the market for a certain goods is described by the equation δQ=dE+pdVμdNwhich, both in form and in content, is analogous to the first law of thermodynamics, where E is the amount of money available in the system (internal energy of system), V is the amount of goods in the system (volume of the system), p is mean price of goods in the system (pressure), N is the number of elements (market actors), μ is the financial potential — a change in the amount of money in the system when the number of its elements changes per unit (due to migration, dissociation, recombination, etc.), δQ is the heat — the amount of money that the elements of one system directly transfer to the elements of another system without buying and selling goods (for example, direct investments, dividend payments, cash gifts, donations, taxes, subsidies, loans, loan payments, etc.) and without changing the number of elements in the system.

The first law (1) shows that there are three ways to change the energy of an economic system [19]: (i) by changing the volume of the system (work); (ii) by changing the number of system elements (financial work); (iii) without changing the volume of the system and the number of its elements due to the direct transfer of money between the elements (heat transfer or heat exchange). There are no other ways to change the energy (the amount of money) of the economic system.

It was shown in [19] that for economic systems, the entropy S can be introduced in a natural way, which for nonequilibrium processes satisfies the condition (second law) dSδQ/Twhere T is the temperature of the economic system (economic temperature) — an intensive parameter that characterizes the economic system as a whole.

For equilibrium (quasi-static) processes, the entropy S0=S0T,V,N

satisfies the equation (second law for equilibrium processes) dS0=δQ/T

As in physics, the parameters (p,T,V,N,E) of the economic system are not independent, but are related by relations (equations of state) that characterize the given economic system [19].

These include the thermal equation of state of the economic system p=f(T,V,N)and the energy (financial) equation of state of the economic system E=E(T,V,N)which can be obtained by methods of economic thermostatistics [19].

In particular, for a primitive (ideal) market [19], the equation of state (5) has the form pV=k0NTwhere k0 is the numerical constant that determines the scale of temperature [19] — an analog of the Boltzmann constant.

Despite the fact that economic temperature, as an indicator of the state of the economic system, was introduced and discussed in many works (see, for example, [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [19], [20]), its real physical meaning and measurement methods remain unclear.

This paper is a further development of the ideas of the paper [19]. In particular, we will clarify the concepts of energy and temperature of an economic system, consider the thermodynamic conditions for the stability of the equilibrium of economic systems, and show the possibilities of thermodynamic methods in describing some economic processes.

Section snippets

Energy of the economic system

In [19], considering the thermodynamics of the market, we considered that the energy E of the economic system is only the amount of money that is in this system. Let us consider this issue in more detail.

Suppose the amount of money that a person has is M. He decided to buy a car, the value of which is U. The amount of money that this person has left after buying a car is M. Obviously, in the simplest case, we can write the equality (“the law of conservation of energy”) M=M+UWe assume here

Temperature of the economic system

Let us assume that the system has several financial instruments equivalent from an economic point of view, which the elements of the system can equally use in their economic activities. In this case, we can talk about different economic degrees of freedom. The number of economic degrees of freedom, including money, is equal to ν. Using economic thermostatistics [19] and relation (12), it is easy to show that the mean energy of an equilibrium economic system with a constant number of elements

Thermodynamic relations

The first law (1) describes an elementary thermodynamic process in an economic system, i.e. a process with a small change in the parameters of the system and a small thermal (in the economic sense [19]) impact. Taking into account the energy (financial) equation of state (6), the first law (1) can be rewritten as δQ=ETV,NdT+p+EVT,NdV+ENT,VμdN

Here, as is customary in thermodynamics, the subscript indicates the parameters that are considered constant when calculating the derivative.

Taking

Thermodynamic potentials of the economic system

As in conventional thermodynamics, various thermodynamic potentials can be introduced in economic thermodynamics, which can be useful in the analysis of economic systems.

For nonequilibrium processes in economic systems, the second law has the form (2).

Taking into account that the economic temperature is always positive by definition, using Eq. (1), we rewrite inequality (2) as TdSdE+pdVμdN

Introducing the Helmholtz free energy of the economic system F=ETSwe rewrite inequality (54) as dFpdVS

Thermodynamic theory of inflation

In economics, inflation is a general rise in the price level in an economy over a period of time [1].

We can talk about inflation (rise in prices) for specific goods, for a specific group of goods, or for the economy as a whole.

Inflation for an individual good is characterized by the parameter π=ṗ/p — the relative rate of change in the price of the good.

The existing theories of inflation [23], [24], [25], [26] and others are phenomenological in nature, and are based on more or less

Thermodynamic conditions for market equilibrium stability

Consider a closed economic system (N=const) at a constant economic temperature (T=const) and at a constant pressure — the mean price of goods (p=const). Then inequality (64) takes the form dG0

From (107), it follows that for fixed values of the parameters T,p and N, the Gibbs free energy (63) of an economic system in a nonequilibrium state decreases monotonically and tends to the minimum value (65) corresponding to the equilibrium state of this system.

This means that the state of the economic

Le Chatelier’s principle in economics

It is obvious that already by virtue of the definition of stability, a stable system “resists” any changes caused by both internal and external influences.

Let any parameter x=(p,V,N,E,S0) of the system changed by a small value x0, under the action of external influences,. This will lead to a change in the state of the system, and will cause internal changes in it. As a result of these internal processes, the parameter x will change additionally by the value δx. Because the change δx is caused

Interaction of two markets

By definition, two interacting systems are in equilibrium if their interaction does not lead to a change in their states.

Consider two interacting markets in different states, i.e. it is believed that economic temperatures, prices for the same good, quantity of good (the volume of markets) and number of elements in these markets are different. We assume that these markets can interact (i.e. exchange goods, money and elements) only with each other. In this case, we can consider a combined system

Concluding remarks

Thus, in [19] and in the present work, we have shown that economic thermodynamics (thermodynamic method for describing economic systems and processes) can be constructed as a phenomenological theory, by analogy with how it is done in physics.

We see that there is a deep analogy between the parameters of thermodynamic and economic systems (markets). In particular, each thermodynamic parameter can be associated with a certain economic parameter or indicator (see Table 1).

Obviously, this table of

CRediT authorship contribution statement

S.A. Rashkovskiy: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was done on the theme of the State Task, Russia No. AAAA-A20-120011690135-5.

References (30)

  • SaslowW.M.

    An economic analogy to thermodynamics

    Amer. J. Phys.

    (1999)
  • DragulescuA. et al.

    Statistical mechanics of money, V

    Eur. Phys. J. B

    (2000)
  • YakovenkoV.M.

    Statistical mechanics approach to the probability distribution of money

  • KhrennikovA.

    Thermodynamic-like approach to complexity of the financial market (in the light of the present financial crises)

  • BanerjeeA. et al.

    Universal patterns of inequality

    New J. Phys.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text