Susceptibility of a two-level atom near an isotropic photonic band edge: Transparency and band edge profile reconstruction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.01.044Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We consider the linear response of a driven two-level atom coupled to an isotropic band edge.

  • We consider atomic decay in a vacuum with a flat and a non-flat density of modes.

  • Transparency at certain frequencies occurs for an isotropic band gap density of modes.

  • The band edge density of modes can be obtained from the measured susceptibility.

Abstract

We discuss the necessary conditions for a two-level system in the presence of an isotropic band edge to be transparent to a probe laser field. The two-level atom is transparent whenever it is coupled to a reservoir constituted of two parts—a flat and a non-flat density of modes representing a PBG structure. A proposal on the reconstruction of the band edge profile from the experimentally measured susceptibility is also presented.

Introduction

The investigation of optical properties of atoms coupled to dissipative environments with a structured density of modes has been a topic of active research over the years  [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Of particular interest is the discussion of atoms (impurities) embedded in two or three-dimensional periodic dielectric structures, known as photonic crystals  [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], since they allow control over the electromagnetic density of modes and the spatial modulation of narrow-linewidth (high-Q) modes, in both microwave and optical regimes  [23]. When these structures are used to create one or several forbidden frequency bands they allow control or complete suppression of spontaneous emission, as well as absorption from those embedded impurities [11], [13], [16], [17], [18], [20], [21], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]. It was particularly relevant to the early observation that a two-level atom embedded in a PBG  [11], [12], [17], [18] could retain some population in the upper level, even when the transition frequency was in the transmitting band, being the final state a dressed state of the atom with a localized field mode, which lies in the forbidden band. More recently the attention has been shifted to quantum dots embedded in photonic crystals where each individual quantum dot can be seen as an “artificial atom”  [33], [34], [35]. The important feature in any of those situations above is that the “atom” placed in such a structure interacts with the field modes in the propagating frequency band and in the forbidden photonic band gap (PBG) as well, giving rise to many interesting coherent phenomena such as the possibility of controlling non-Markovian decay  [5], [27], localization of superradiance  [17], quantum interference effects in spontaneous emission [20], [28], transparency to a probe field  [21], and squeezing in the in-phase quadrature spectra  [25].

The majority of contributions regarding radiative properties consider only spontaneous emission of two, three, four and five level atoms embedded in a PBG structure  [20], [22], [31], [32], [36], [37], with only a few exceptions treating absorptive and dispersive properties  [21], [38]. As an important example of this last case, the absorption and dispersion properties of a Λ-type atom decaying spontaneously near the edge of a PBG was studied  [21]. It was pointed out, within an isotropic PBG model, that the atom can become transparent to a probe laser field, even when other dissipative channels are present, suggesting that many surprising effects in the absorption and dispersion of atoms embedded in such structures can appear. Most of those effects were considered inside model systems composed by three or more levels  [5], [7], [20], [21], [23], [24], [31], [32], [36], [37], while they were not proved to be strictly necessary.

Pursuing this line we revisit the problem of transparency of an atom placed near an isotropic band edge  [21], but consider the minimal situation of transitions between two-levels only. We show that for it to be transparent to a weak driven field, the two-level atom must be coupled to a reservoir constituted of two parts—a flat and a non-flat density of modes representing a PBG structure. Transparency is therefore an inner property of the reservoir engineering. As a side result of this approach we consider the related inverse problem considered in Refs.  [14], [39], [40] on the possibility to obtain information about the band edge profile from two-level temporal decay in such structure. Here we show that it is also possible to reconstruct the band edge characteristics directly from the experimentally measured susceptibility.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section  2, we present the model considered and its stationary solution. In Section  3, the linear susceptibility is evaluated, and two models of isotropic band gap structures are analyzed. In Section  4, is discussed how to reconstruct the band edge characteristics from the experimentally measured susceptibility. Finally, in Section  5 we conclude the paper.

Section snippets

Model

The system considered here is a two-level atom with excited and ground state |1 and |0, respectively and with transition frequency ω0. The atom is probed by a weak electric field with frequency ω detuned from ω0 by δ=ωω0. The decay of the excited state is due to a coupling with vacuum modes described by a collection of harmonic oscillators with frequencies ωm. In the rotating wave approximation and in the interaction picture the Hamiltonian of the system is given by H=(Ωeiδt|01|+H.c.)+m(gm

Susceptibility

The induced polarization due to the applied external field is given by P(t)=0χ̃(tt)E(t)dt, where χ̃(t) is the complex susceptibility, whose imaginary and real part are related to the atom absorption and dispersion of energy from the laser field, respectively  [41]. For a harmonic field E(t)=Eoeiωt+h.c. the polarization becomes P(t)=2Re(eiωtχ(ω)Eo), where χ(ω) is the Fourier transform of χ̃(t). On the other hand, the atom polarization is obtained as an average of the atomic dipole

Band-edge profile reconstruction

Since we have developed all the necessary ingredients for understanding the effects of the structured reservoir on the atomic transparency to the probe, we would like to discuss a rather important related problem, which is the inverse problem of determining the characteristics of the band gap and its profile from experimental data. As pointed out by Nabiev  [14], the band gap profile can be determined from the experimental data on the temporal behavior of the atomic spontaneous decay. Indeed,

Conclusion

In conclusion, we saw that it is possible to obtain transparency to a laser probe field on a two-level atom if the atomic coupling with a reservoir constituted by flat and non-flat densities of modes existing in a PBG is considered. We have considered two isotropic band-gap models and analyzed the linear response to a weak optical field through the susceptibility function. We have also discussed the possibility of band edge profile reconstruction via the susceptibility function knowledge. This

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by CNPq and FAPESP through the Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Informação Quântica (INCT-IQ) and through the Research Center in Optics and Photonics (CePOF).

References (44)

  • D. Zhang et al.

    Control of spontaneous emission from a microwave-field-driven four-level atom in an anisotropic photonic crystal

    Phys. Lett. A

    (2012)
  • D. Zhang et al.

    Spontaneous emission properties of a driven five-level atom embedded in photonic crystals

    Opt. Commun.

    (2012)
  • D. Kleppner

    Inhibited spontaneous emission

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1981)
  • M. Lewenstein et al.

    Dynamical suppression of spontaneous emission

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1987)
  • M. Lewenstein et al.

    Spontaneous emission of atoms coupled to frequency-dependent reservoirs

    Phys. Rev. A

    (1988)
  • S. Haroche et al.

    Cavity quantum electrodynamics

    Phys. Today

    (1989)
  • G. Harel et al.

    Control of non-Markovian decay and decoherence by measurements and interference

    Opt. Express

    (1998)
  • G.A. Prataviera et al.

    Probing colored noise from the index of refraction of strongly driven two-level atoms

    Phys. Rev. A

    (1999)
  • P. Lambropoulos et al.

    Fundamental quantum optics in structured reservoirs

    Rep. Progr. Phys.

    (2000)
  • A. Auffèves-Garnier et al.

    Giant optical nonlinearity induced by a single two-level system interacting with a cavity in the purcell regime

    Phys. Rev. A

    (2007)
  • E. Yablotonovitch et al.

    Photonic band structure: the face-centered-cubic case

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1989)
  • K.M. Ho et al.

    Existence of a photonic band gap in periodic dieletric structures

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1990)
  • S. John et al.

    Quantum electrodynamics near a photonic band gap: photons bound states and dressed atoms

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1990)
  • S. John et al.

    Quantum optics of localized light in a photonic band gap

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1991)
  • T.W. Mossberg et al.

    Radiative properties of strongly driven atoms in the presence of photonic bands and gaps

    J. Opt. Soc. Amer. B Opt. Phys.

    (1993)
  • R.F. Nabiev et al.

    Dynamics of the spontaneous emission of an atom into the photon-density-of-states gap: solvable quantum-electrodynamical model

    Phys. Rev. A

    (1993)
  • S. John et al.

    Spontaneous emission near the edge of a photonic band gap

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1994)
  • A.G. Kofman et al.

    Spontaneous and induced atomic decay in photonic band structures

    J. Modern Opt.

    (1994)
  • S. John et al.

    Localization of superradiance near a photonic band gap

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1995)
  • S. John et al.

    Quantum optical spin-glass state of impurity two-level atoms in a photonic band gap

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1996)
  • I.I. Tarhan et al.

    Photonic band structure of fcc colloidal crystals

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1996)
  • S.-Y. Zhu et al.

    Quantum interference effects in spontaneous emission from an atom embedded in a photonic band gap structure

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text