ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Performance Evaluation
Volume 65, Issue 8, July 2008, Pages 606-622
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (1531 K)

Article Toolbox
  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.peva.2008.01.001    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Published by Elsevier B.V.

Effective load balancing for cluster-based servers employing job preemptionstar, open

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Victoria Ungureanua, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Benjamin Melamedb, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Michael Katehakisc, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aDIMACS Center, Rutgers University, 96 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States

bDepartment of MSIS, Rutgers University, 94 Rockafeller Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States

cDepartment of MSIS, Rutgers University, 180 University Ave., Newark, NJ 07102, United States


Received 1 September 2005; 
revised 29 May 2007; 
accepted 13 January 2008. 
Available online 25 January 2008.

Abstract

A cluster-based server consists of a front-end dispatcher and multiple back-end servers. The dispatcher receives incoming jobs, and then decides how to assign them to back-end servers, which in turn serve the jobs according to some discipline. Cluster-based servers have been widely deployed, as they combine good performance with low costs.

Several assignment policies have been proposed for cluster-based servers, most of which aim to balance the load among back-end servers. There are two main strategies for load balancing: The first aims to balance the amount of workload at back-end servers, while the second aims to balance the number of jobs assigned to back-end servers. Examples of policies using these strategies are Dynamic and LC (Least Connected), respectively.

In this paper we propose a policy, called LC*, which combines the two aforementioned strategies. The paper shows experimentally that when preemption is admitted (i.e., when jobs execute concurrently on back-end servers), LC* substantially outperforms bothDynamic and LC in terms of response-time metrics. This improved performance is achieved by using only information readily available to the dispatcher, rendering LC* a practical policy to implement. Finally, we study a refinement, called ALC* (Adaptive LC*), which further improves on the response-time performance of LC* by adapting its actions to incoming traffic rates.

Keywords: Cluster-based servers; Back-end server architecture; Job preemption; Simulation

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. The impact of preemption on the performance of assignment policies
2.1. Back-end server scheduling policies
2.2. Simulation data
2.3. Simulation experiments
2.3.1. Job processing without preemption
2.3.2. Job processing with preemption
3. The LC* policy
4. ALC*—an adaptive version of the LC* policy
4.1. The effect of dispatcher overhead on ALC* performance
4.2. The effect of cache misses on ALC* performance
4.3. The effect of dynamic requests on ALC* performance
4.4. Scalability of ALC*
5. Conclusion
References
Vitae














star, openA preliminary version of this paper appeared in the Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (IEEE NCA04).


Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 732 445 3128; fax: +1 732 445 6329.

Performance Evaluation
Volume 65, Issue 8, July 2008, Pages 606-622
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.