ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (1206 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.peva.2006.06.002    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

OBS contention resolution performance

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

A. Zaleskya, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, H.L. Vub, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Z. Rosbergc, E-mail The Corresponding Author, E.W.M. Wongd, E-mail The Corresponding Author and M. Zukermana, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aARC Special Research Centre for Ultra-Broadband Information Networks (CUBIN), Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia

bThe Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures, Faculty of I.C.T., Swinburne University of Technology, P.O. Box 218, Vic. 3122, Australia

cDepartment of Communication Systems Engineering, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel

dOptoelectronics Research Centre, Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China


Received 11 August 2005; 
revised 5 February 2006. 
Available online 7 August 2006.

Abstract

In this paper, a performance comparison of resolution policies specific to optical burst switching is presented. A framework, based on a reduced-load approximation, is developed to estimate path blocking probabilities in an optical burst switched network of arbitrary topology, in which any combination of the following resolution policies is applied in a specific order: limited wavelength conversion, burst deflection and burst segmentation. Our framework is used to compare the relative performance of each resolution policy for two sets of ingress and egress router pairs defined on the NSF network. With respect to the assumptions considered, it is shown that limited wavelength conversion is more effective in reducing blocking relative to burst deflection if the maximum wavelength conversion radius is sufficiently large, otherwise burst deflection is more effective. Furthermore, limited wavelength conversion or burst deflection are more effective in reducing blocking relative to burst segmentation. Burst segmentation is justified as a stand alone resolution policy; however, using burst segmentation to complement another resolution policy offers only a marginal reduction in blocking. Both just-in-time and just-enough-time scheduling is analyzed. Simulations are implemented to corroborate the accuracy of our framework and extensions.

Keywords: Optical burst switching; Blocking probability; Reduced-load approximation; Burst contention; Limited wavelength conversion; Deflection routing; Burst segmentation

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Reduced-load approximation with burst deflection
3. Burst segmentation
4. Limited wavelength conversion
5. Combinations of resolution policies
6. Numerical performance evaluation
6.1. Network dimensioning
7. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
Vitae









Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author.

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.