ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Performance Evaluation
Volume 62, Issues 1-4, October 2005, Pages 382-399
Performance 2005
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (382 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.peva.2005.07.020    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

On the compromise between burstiness and frequency of events

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Alain Jean-Mariea, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Yvan Calasb, 1, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Tigist Alemua, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aLIRMM, 161 Rue Ada, 34392 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

bInformation Technology Department, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland


Available online 10 August 2005.

Abstract

Consider two situations where events occur randomly in a system with a common average rate, but with different distributions for the size of bursts of events. Assume that the performance measure of interest is the probability that less than h events occur in a given time period. Is it possible to decide which of the two situations is the best? It turns out that when the average rate varies whereas the burst distributions are fixed, the winning situation may change: there is a tradeoff between burstiness and frequency. The purpose of this paper is to investigate this tradeoff. We use two simple models for this: the discrete-time two-state Markov chain (known as the Gilbert model) and a compound Poisson process, viewed as an approximation of the Gilbert model. For each of them, we show that indeed there exists a threshold value for the event rate at which the best configuration changes. We analytically derive the asymptotic value of this threshold when the number h grows. We apply this analysis to the performance evaluation of Forward Error Correction applied to flow of packets in networks with different Queue Management schemes, namely: RED and Drop Tail. The measure of interest is the probability of losing less than h packets in a certain block. Through simulation measurements, we exhibit the same tradeoff phenomenon, and we collect statistics showing that the Gilbert model is partly adequate to represent the situation.

Keywords: Burstiness; Packet loss; Gilbert model; FEC

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. The Gilbert model
3. The compound Poisson model
4. Application to FEC
5. Experimental validation
5.1. Network topology
5.2. Performance metrics
5.3. Good and loss run lengths
5.4. Fit to the Gilbert model
5.5. Influence of the transverse traffic
5.6. Influence of the block size
6. Conclusion
Appendix A. Proof of Proposition 3
References
Vitae










Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author.
1 This work was performed principally while the author was with Laboratoire Informatique et Distribution, ZIRST, 51 Avenue Jean Kuntzmann, 38330 Montbonnot Saint-Martin, France.

Performance Evaluation
Volume 62, Issues 1-4, October 2005, Pages 382-399
Performance 2005
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.