doi:10.1016/j.peva.2004.12.004
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
A bandwidth reservation mechanism for prioritized multimedia integrated access with very high channel throughput in beyond 3G TDMA-based wireless networks
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
P. Koutsakis
,
and M. Paterakis
Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Information and Computer Networks Laboratory, Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece
Received 6 July 2004;
revised 16 December 2004.
Available online 2 March 2005.
Abstract
A Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol for mobile wireless multimedia communications is presented and investigated. The new ideas presented in the protocol are combined with well known policies from the literature and the protocol is shown to achieve very high channel throughput results, whilst preserving the strict Quality of Service (QoS) requirements for all traffic types. We evaluate, via simulations, the performance of the protocol when integrating voice, video and bursty data packet traffic over a wireless TDMA-based channel of high capacity, and we focus on the impact of different types and loads of data traffic on the system performance.
Keywords: Wireless cellular communications; MAC protocol; Multimedia integrated access
Fig. 1. (a) Status of information slots at the beginning of a frame in which a new VF will arrive. (b) “Reshuffling” done by the BS.
Fig. 2. Frame structure for the 9.045 Mbps channel.
Fig. 3. Percentage decrease in the maximum voice capacity when using the Pareto data traffic model, in comparison to the Poisson data traffic model (1 video user is admitted in the system).
Fig. 4. Percentage decrease in the maximum voice capacity when using the Pareto data traffic model, in comparison to the Poisson data traffic model (5 video users are admitted in the system).
Table 1.
Experimental system parameters

Table 2.
Adjustable request bandwidth depending on the number of video users

Table 3.
Maximum voice capacity and throughput when 0 video users are admitted in the system, without the use of the M-block mechanism

Table 4.
Maximum voice capacity and throughput when 0 video users are admitted in the system, with the use of the M-block mechanism (M = 3)

Table 5.
Maximum voice capacity when 1 video user is admitted in the system, without the use of the M-block mechanism

Table 6.
Maximum voice capacity when 1 video user is admitted in the system, with he use of the M-block mechanism (M = 3)

Table 7.
Maximum voice capacity and Throughput when 3 video users are admitted in the system, without the use of the M-block mechanism

Table 8.
Maximum voice capacity and throughput when 3 video users are admitted in the system, with the use of the M-block mechanism (M = 3)

Table 9.
Maximum voice capacity when 5 video users are admitted in the system, without the use of the M-block mechanism

Table 10.
Maximum voice capacity when 5 video users are admitted in the system, with the use of the M-block mechanism (M = 3)


Corresponding author. Tel.: +30 2821037343; fax: +30 2821037542.