ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (192 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.peva.2003.08.002    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Modeling techniques for VBR video: feasibility and limitations

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Nasser-Eddine Rikli E-mail The Corresponding Author

Department of Computer Engineering, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia


Received 19 March 2003; 
Revised 11 August 2003. 
Available online 22 October 2003.

Abstract

Many techniques have been proposed to evaluate the performance of ATM networks carrying VBR video traffic. The choice among these techniques may not be straightforward for researchers in other areas of computer networks. The aim of this work is to focus on three techniques that are based on two source models, and present a comparative study for them. As it will be shown, it is very difficult to have a perfect modeling technique that fits into all situations. The added complexity of multimedia traffic will make such task unfeasible. Also, a look into the situations of advantageous applicability of each one of these techniques, along with possible limitations and drawbacks will be given.

Author Keywords: Author Keywords: VBR video; Semi-Markov; Fluid-flow; Autoregressive; ATM networks; Modeling techniques

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Modeling aspects
2.1. Granularity
2.2. Rare events
2.3. Heavy-traffic condition
2.4. Compression
3. Source models
3.1. Source description
3.2. Model I: Markovian model
3.3. Model II: AR model
4. Performance techniques
4.1. Semi-Markov
4.2. Fluid-flow
4.3. Simulation
5. Comparison
5.1. Simulation vs. fluid-flow
5.2. Simulation vs. semi-Markov
5.3. Fluid-flow vs. semi-Markov
5.4. Global comparison
6. Conclusions
References
Vitae







 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.