ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (2149 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2007.01.009    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Can large increases in viscosity and thermal conductivity preserve large-scale heterogeneity in the mantle?

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

John B. Naliboff1, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Louise H. KelloggCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aGeology Department, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States


Received 5 July 2006; 
revised 3 January 2007; 
accepted 17 January 2007. 
Available online 4 February 2007.

Abstract

Recent studies in mineral physics suggest that the major component minerals undergo substantial changes in properties at the pressure and temperature conditions that pertain at the lower mantle. The associated affect on mantle viscosity and thermal conductivity could influence mantle flow. Several studies explore the effect of viscosity variations on mantle mixing, but none have yet examined the combined effects of pressure on both viscosity and thermal conductivity. Here, we explore the dynamical influence of variations in thermal conductivity and viscosity suggested by recent experiments [Badro, J., Fiquet, G., Guyot, F., Rueff, J., Struzhkin, V.V., Vanko, G., Monaco, G., 2003. Iron partitioning in Earth's mantle: toward a deep lower mantle discontinuity. Science, 300, 789–791; Badro, J., Rueff, J., Vanko, G., Monaco, G., Fiquet, G., Guyot, F., 2004. Electronic transitions in perovskite: possible nonconvection layers in the lower mantle. Science 305, 383–386] as a mechanism for generating mantle heterogeneity. We performed a series of 2-D computations using the finite element thermal convection code ConMan [King, S.D., Raefsky, A., Hager, B.H., 1990. ConMan—vectorizing a finite element code for incompressible 2-dimensional convection in the Earth's mantle. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 59, 195–207], where the viscosity and/or thermal conductivity increases at the vertical mid-point of either internally or basally heated models. Because the effect of pressure on material properties is poorly characterized, we explored a wide range of values. Increasing either viscosity or thermal conductivity alone or both viscosity and thermal conductivity together by a factor of up to 150 changes the thermal profile and dynamics, with increases in either or both tending to increase the wavelength of structures and the temperature in the lowermost mantle. Passive tracers show efficient transfer of mass across the transition depth, with no layering. The configurational entropy of the tracer distributions increases with time and indicates relatively efficient mixing. If geochemical constraints such as neon, xenon, and neodymium isotopes require long-lived isolated mantle reservoirs, a mechanism other than varying viscosity and thermal conductivity must be invoked; intrinsic density contrasts may be required.

Keywords: Mantle dynamics; Thermal convection; Mixing; Thermal conductivity

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Numerical methods
2.1. Governing equations and model geometry
2.2. Viscosity and thermal conductivity
2.3. Model parameter space
2.4. Tracer particles
3. Results
3.1. Models with a step-wise increase in viscosity and thermal conductivity
3.1.1. Basal heat flow, temperature and flow patterns
3.2. Temperature and pressure-dependent viscosity models
3.2.1. Basal heat flow, temperature and flow patterns
3.2.2. Evaluating mixing using tracer distributions
4. Discussion
4.1. Isolating reservoirs with thermal conductivity and viscosity contrasts?
4.2. Variation of long-term mixing rates in the Earth's mantle with increasing viscosity and thermal conductivity?
4.3. Consequences of temperature and pressure-dependent thermal conductivity, a decrease in thermal conductivity in the lower mantle, or strong partitioning of iron into perovskite
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References











Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author.
1 Present address: Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, United States.

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.