ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Pattern Recognition Letters
Volume 28, Issue 14, 15 October 2007, Pages 1885-1906
Image: Information and Control
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (1822 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2006.12.018    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

2D and 3D face recognition: A survey

Andrea F. Abatea, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Michele NappiCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Daniel Riccioa, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Gabriele Sabatinoa, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aDipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università di Salerno, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy

Available online 26 January 2007.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Government agencies are investing a considerable amount of resources into improving security systems as result of recent terrorist events that dangerously exposed flaws and weaknesses in today’s safety mechanisms. Badge or password-based authentication procedures are too easy to hack. Biometrics represents a valid alternative but they suffer of drawbacks as well. Iris scanning, for example, is very reliable but too intrusive; fingerprints are socially accepted, but not applicable to non-consentient people. On the other hand, face recognition represents a good compromise between what’s socially acceptable and what’s reliable, even when operating under controlled conditions. In last decade, many algorithms based on linear/nonlinear methods, neural networks, wavelets, etc. have been proposed. Nevertheless, Face Recognition Vendor Test 2002 shown that most of these approaches encountered problems in outdoor conditions. This lowered their reliability compared to state of the art biometrics. This paper provides an “ex cursus” of recent face recognition research trends in 2D imagery and 3D model based algorithms. To simplify comparisons across different approaches, tables containing different collection of parameters (such as input size, recognition rate, number of addressed problems) are provided. This paper concludes by proposing possible future directions.

Keywords: 2D/3D face recognition; Face databases

Article Outline

1. Face, the most attractive biometric
2. Automatic face recognition: the old and the new
2.1. Linear/nonlinear projection methods
2.2. The neural networks
2.3. Gabor filters and wavelets
2.4. Fractals and Iterated Function Systems (IFSs)
2.5. Thermal and hyperspectral
3. Open questions in face recognition
3.1. The changes in illumination
3.2. The changes in pose
3.3. The occlusion
3.4. The age
3.5. Is there a more general way to state a technique better than others?
4. 3D face recognition
4.1. 3D face data acquisition
4.2. 3D face recognition methods
4.2.1. 2D-based class
4.2.2. 3D-based class
4.2.3. 2D + 3D-based class
5. Discussion and remarks
References














Pattern Recognition Letters
Volume 28, Issue 14, 15 October 2007, Pages 1885-1906
Image: Information and Control
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.