Personality traits predicting anger in self-, ambiguous-, and other caused unpleasant situations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.011Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examined how the experience of anger is differentially related to self-esteem, trait anger, and empathy depending on who is responsible for the anger-eliciting event. Participants engaged in a directed imagery task in which they reported on their anger experience in response to six scenarios that depicted unpleasant situations in which oneself is responsible, in which responsibility is ambiguous, or in which someone else is responsible. The results demonstrated that a low self-esteem predisposed participants to experience anger only when oneself was responsible for the unpleasant event. Anger experience was related to trait anger in all studied situation types, but most strongly in situations that were ambiguous with respect to who is responsible for what has happened. Finally, empathy was found to be most strongly related to anger experience in unpleasant situations in which someone else is responsible. These findings demonstrate the importance of taking into account contextual information for predicting emotional experience on the basis of traits and illustrate how emotional experience is the result of the interaction between person and situation.

Introduction

A common critique on personality traits is their limited predictive power for concrete behaviour and responses (Mischel & Shoda, 1998). One reason that has been advanced for their limited predictive power is that they may only affect an individual’s behavior and reactions in specific, trait-relevant situations (e.g., Kenrick & Funder, 1988), situations that draw on particular sensitivities or vulnerabilities associated with the trait. As a result, the predictive power of personality traits may be limited to or highest in such specific, trait-relevant situations. A key task for personality psychologists, then, is to identify those situations in which particular personality traits most strongly influence an individual’s reaction to the event.

In the present study, we present an analysis of traits that predispose people to experience the emotion of anger in reaction to specific contexts or events. Anger is an emotion that is frequently experienced by most individuals and that can have major interpersonal, societal, and even health consequences (e.g., Spielberger et al., 1985). Identifying which traits predispose individuals to experience anger in which situations can provide useful information for prevention and intervention programs aimed at altering the disruptive impact of anger. In what follows, we will first discuss the concept of responsibility which we expect to play a crucial role in qualifying the experience of anger, followed by a discussion of personality traits—self-esteem, trait anger, and empathy—which we expect to be differentially related to anger in events characterized by specific instances of responsibility.

Section snippets

Responsibility

One of the crucial factors in qualifying the anger response is that of blame or responsibility for an unpleasant event (e.g., Kuppens, Van Mechelen, Smits, & De Boeck, 2003). An assignment of blame is assumed to lie at the core of the experience of anger, directing the mobilized energy that accompanies it towards the source of frustration (e.g., Frijda, 1986). Although anger is prototypically regarded as resulting from someone else’s wrongdoing, people can also experience anger when oneself is

The role of self-esteem when oneself is responsible

In general, in terms of mere level of self-esteem, it is assumed that low levels of self-esteem predispose towards anger,1 although the found relations have been inconsistent and weak (e.g., Baumeister et al., 1996, Esposito et al., 2005). A possible

The role of trait anger when responsibility is ambiguous

Trait anger refers to a personality characteristic that predisposes an individual to experience anger more frequently and more intensely (e.g., Deffenbacher, 1992). Thus, individuals scoring high on trait anger should in general respond with more intense anger to an event compared to individuals scoring low on trait anger. Yet, as situations that are ambiguous with respect to who is responsible are considered to be highly diagnostic for individual differences in anger (e.g., Orobio de Castro et

The role of empathy when someone else is responsible

Unpleasant situations for which someone else is to blame are the prototypical events in which anger is experienced (e.g., Russell & Fehr, 1994). Although most individuals can be expected to experience some level of anger in such circumstances, we hypothesize that some will experience more intense anger than others, depending on their level of empathy. Individuals that are highly empathic tend to take the perspective of the other person and place oneself into the mind of the other. In cases when

Participants

Participants were 345 students attending the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. They participated in return for course credits. Of the participants, 270 were female, 75 were male. Their mean age was 18,4 years.

Imagery task

Situation descriptions. To obtain situation descriptions that depict the different types of responsibility, situation descriptions were taken from a study by Kuppens and Van Mechelen (in press). In this study, other-blame scores (based on a three-item scale) were collected for 24

Procedure

At the start of the directed imagery task, participants were given a booklet containing descriptions of the six unpleasant situations. For each situation, they were asked to carefully read the description, imagine as vividly as possible how they would feel, what they would do, and what they would think in such a situation, and subsequently rate their anger response. At the end of this task, they were asked to fill out the personality questionnaires. All materials were in Dutch.

Results

As expected, participants on average felt most intense anger in the unpleasant situations in which someone else is responsible (M = 4.54, SD = 1.29) as compared to unpleasant situations in which oneself is responsible (M = 2.47, SD = 1.61) or which are ambiguous with respect to responsibility (M = 2.56, SD = 1.52), the difference being significant (F = 429.42, p < .001).

Multilevel (mixed model) regression analyses (Snijders & Bosker, 1999) were performed to examine how the personality traits are differentially

Discussion

In general, the findings illustrate that the predictive power of dispositional traits may be moderated by situational factors. The experience of anger was differentially related to dispositional characteristics as a function of who is to blame in the situation.

First, the results showed that a low self-esteem is related to higher levels of anger, but only when oneself is responsible for an unpleasant event. This finding suggests that a low self-esteem facilitates the experience of anger in cases

Acknowledgement

The research reported in this paper was supported by KULeuven Research Council Grant GOA/05/04. The first author is a postdoctoral research fellow of the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research.

References (24)

  • J.C. Pruessner et al.

    Low self-esteem, induced failure and the adrenocortical stress response

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (1999)
  • R.F. Baumeister et al.

    Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem

    Psychological Review

    (1996)
  • M.H. Davis

    Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1983)
  • J.L. Deffenbacher

    Trait anger: Theory findings and implications

  • A. DiPaula et al.

    Self-esteem and persistence in the face of failure

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2002)
  • K.A. Dutton et al.

    Global self-esteem and specific self-views as determinants of people’s reactions to success and failure

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1997)
  • Ellsworth, P. C., & Tong, E. M. W. (in press). What does it mean to be angry at yourself? Categories, appraisals, and...
  • A.J. Esposito et al.

    Aggression and self-esteem: A diary study of children’s reactivity to negative interpersonal events

    Journal of Personality

    (2005)
  • N.H. Frijda

    The emotions

    (1986)
  • D.T. Kenrick et al.

    Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate

    American Psychologist

    (1988)
  • M.R. Kruk et al.

    Fast positive feedback between the adrenocortical stress response and a brain mechanism involved in aggressive behavior

    Behavioral Neuroscience

    (2004)
  • Kuppens, P., & Van Mechelen, I. (in press). Interactional appraisal models for the anger appraisals of threatened...
  • Cited by (17)

    • The strength and content of climate anger

      2023, Global Environmental Change
    • The impact of expressing mixed valence emotions in organizational crisis communication on consumer's negative word-of-mouth intention

      2018, Public Relations Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, publics may consider the message as highly sincere and empathetic as it expresses what a human would feel in such situation under most circumstances. However, in a preventable crisis, an anger frame directs the public to attribute blame to the organization itself (Ellsworth & Tong, 2006; Kuppens & Tuerlinckx, 2007). Because when an organization that is to blame expresses anger, it implies that it accepts blame.

    • Experiencing anger in a social interaction: The role of personality

      2018, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      The etiology of anger has been a topic of enduring interest for behavioral scientists (Pease & Lewis, 2015). Previous research has focused on situational (Kuppens & Tuerlinckx, 2007), cognitive (Anderson & Bushman, 2002; Denson, 2013), and dispositional (Deffenbacher, 1992; Miller, Zeichner, & Wilson, 2012) factors that contribute to one's experience of anger. In the present study we focus on the influence of dispositional and situational factors on subjective anger experience in a social interaction.

    • Susceptibility to the gambling near-win effect in optimists versus pessimists: An event-related potential study

      2018, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although such findings help us to better understand behavioral and neurobiological responses to gambling near wins, little work has been done to identify the traits that produce augmented susceptibility to the near-win effect in gambling. Personality traits can affect how one interprets ambiguous information, which in turn can have strong effects on decision-making behavior (Byrne & Eysenck, 1993; Kuppens & Tuerlinckx, 2007; Weertman, Arntz, Schouten, & Dreessen, 2006). Optimism and pessimism are enduring and stable personality traits.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text