Elsevier

Ocean Modelling

Volume 66, June 2013, Pages 64-76
Ocean Modelling

Impact of uncertainties in the horizontal density gradient upon low resolution global ocean modelling

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.02.004Get rights and content

Abstract

In this study, it is shown (i) that, as a result of the nonlinearity of the seawater equation of state, unresolved scales represent a major source of uncertainties in the computation of the large-scale horizontal density gradient from the large-scale temperature and salinity fields, and (ii) that the effect of these uncertainties can be simulated using random processes to represent unresolved temperature and salinity fluctuations. The results of experiments performed with a low resolution global ocean model show that this parameterization has a considerable effect on the average large-scale circulation of the ocean, especially in the regions of intense mesoscale activity. The large-scale flow is less geostrophic, with more intense associated vertical velocities, and the average geographical position of the main temperature and salinity fronts is more consistent with observations. In particular, the simulations suggest that the stochastic effect of the unresolved temperature and salinity fluctuations on the large-scale density field may be sufficient to explain why the Gulf Stream pathway systematically overshoots in non-stochastic low resolution ocean models.

Highlights

► Unresolved scales are a major source of uncertainty in the large-scale density field. ► Stochastic parameterization is used to simulate the effect of this uncertainty. ► This parameterization has a considerable effect on the ocean large-scale circulation.

Introduction

One of the most salient feature of today’s state-of-the-art ocean models is that they are essentially deterministic models, in the sense that they do not involve random numbers to represent uncertainties in the model equations, parameters and forcing, or to simulate the effect of unresolved processes. Yet, this deterministic model dynamics is known to become chaotic as soon as mesoscale eddies are resolved by the model, so that the simulated mesoscale flow can only be viewed as one random realization sampled from a large set of possibilities. It is thus only in a statistical sense that the mesoscale can be compared to the real world, and it is only as a stochastic process that the effect of the mesoscale in the model can be analysed. Mesoscale fluctuations indeed produce a considerable effect on the general circulation of the ocean (Zhai et al., 2004, Penduff et al., 2010), with prominent contributions to momentum, heat and salt fluxes, which cannot be easily parameterized in low resolution models.

As a general rule, the effect of uncertainties or unresolved processes (even if unbiased) does not average to zero in a nonlinear model. For instance, if the wind is fluctuating or if it is uncertain, then neglecting the fluctuations or the uncertainties systematically underestimates the air–sea momentum flux (proportional to the square of the wind speed). In the same way, the average effect of the mesoscale fluctuations does not vanish in the two nonlinear terms of the primitive equations: the advection term and the equation of state. Concerning the advection term, this effect was originally parameterized in ocean models using empirically specified horizontal diffusion (Bryan et al., 1979), and afterwards using more and more sophisticated advection/diffusion operators (see Griffies et al., 2000 for a review). Concerning the equation of state, the effect of the mesoscale temperature and salinity fluctuations on the large-scale density field is generally ignored, maybe because it cannot be easily parameterized using a deterministic formulation. However, it can easily be argued (see Section 3.1), that, in low resolution ocean models, the resulting approximation in the large-scale density is a major source of uncertainties in the horizontal pressure gradient, and thus in the horizontal momentum balance equation.

A different point of view can also be adopted to deal with model uncertainties. Rather than parameterizing their mean effect in the model, they can be explicitly simulated by including a random forcing in the model equations. This can be done to produce ensemble forecasts (Buizza et al., 1999, Palmer et al., 2005) or to simulate model error in ensemble data assimilation methods (Evensen, 1994). In such applications, the random forcing is not only responsible for the dispersion of the ensemble; it can also produce a significant mean effect in the simulations (Berner et al., in press, Williams, 2012, Palmer, 2012). In this study, the same kind of approach is used to simulate the uncertainties that unresolved mesoscale temperature and salinity fluctuations produce on the large-scale horizontal density field. The objective is to propose a simple (empirically specified) stochastic parameterization of these uncertainties (in Section 3), and to evaluate the impact that this parameterization may have on the ocean circulation (in Section 4), as simulated by a low resolution global model configuration (described in Section 2).

Section snippets

A low resolution global ocean model

The purpose of this section is to present the NEMO primitive equation model and to describe the ORCA2 low resolution global ocean configuration.

Uncertainties in the horizontal density gradient

As mentioned in Section 2.2, in a low resolution ocean model, the primitive Eqs. (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6) are used to describe the large-scale component of the ocean circulation. In the averaging of the equations to extract the large scales, the effect of unresolved scales does not cancel out in the nonlinear terms of the equations, which are (i) the advection terms (first term in the right hand side of Eqs. (1), (4), (5)), and (ii) the equation of state (Eq. (6), with the formulation given

Impact on the model simulation

The purpose of this section is to provide an overview of the effect that the stochastic parameterization described in Section 3 produces in the low resolution global ocean model described in Section 2. For that purpose, two model simulations will be compared: the reference simulation is performed using the standard NEMO primitive equation model, as described by Eqs. (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10); and the stochastic simulation is performed by replacing the deterministic

Conclusions

In this study, it has been shown (i) that, as a result of the nonlinearity of the seawater equation of state, unresolved scales represent a major source of uncertainties in the computation of the large-scale horizontal density gradient from the large-scale temperature and salinity fields, and (ii) that the effect of these uncertainties can be simulated using random processes to represent unresolved temperature and salinity fluctuations. However, the stochastic parameterization of the

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted as a contribution to the SANGOMA project funded by the E.U. (grant FP7-SPACE-2011-1-CT-283580-SANGOMA), with additional support from CNES. I wish to thank Jacques Verron and Pierre Brasseur for their support to this study and for their encouragements to publish this work; and I am also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions. The calculations were performed using HPC resources from GENCI-IDRIS (Grant 2011-011279).

References (31)

  • S.M. Griffies et al.

    Developments in ocean climate modelling

    Ocean Modell.

    (2000)
  • B. Barnier et al.

    Impact of partial steps and momentum advection schemes in a global ocean circulation model at eddy permitting resolution

    Ocean Dyn.

    (2006)
  • P.S. Berloff

    On rectification of randomly forced flows

    J. Marine Res.

    (2005)
  • Berner, J., Jung, T., Palmer, N., in press. Systematic model error: the impact of increased horizontal resolution...
  • B. Blanke et al.

    Low frequency variability of the tropical atlantic ocean simulated by a general circulation model with mixed layer physics

    J. Phys. Oceanograph.

    (1993)
  • K. Bryan et al.

    A water mass model of the global ocean

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1979)
  • R. Buizza et al.

    Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system

    Quater. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc.

    (1999)
  • J. Emile-Geay et al.

    Geothermal heating, diapycnal mixing and the abyssal circulation

    Ocean Sci.

    (2009)
  • G. Evensen

    Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1994)
  • N. Ferry et al.

    The Mercator ocean team, Mercator global eddy permitting ocean reanalysis GLORYS1V1: description and results

    Mercator Ocean Newslett.

    (2010)
  • J. Frederiksen et al.

    Stochastic subgrid parameterizations for atmospheric and oceanic flows

    Phys. Scripta

    (2012)
  • D.R. Jackett et al.

    Minimal adjustment of hydrographic data to achieve static stability

    J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.

    (1995)
  • E. Kazantsev et al.

    Subgrid-scale eddy parameterization by statistical mechanics in a barotropic ocean model

    J. Phys. Oceanograph.

    (1998)
  • A. Klocker et al.

    Influence of the nonlinear equation of state on global estimates of dianeutral advection and diffusion

    J. Phys. Oceanograph.

    (2010)
  • W. Large et al.

    The global climatology of an interannually varying air–sea flux data set

    Climate Dyn.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (57)

    • Assessment of a regional physical–biogeochemical stochastic ocean model. Part 1: Ensemble generation

      2021, Ocean Modelling
      Citation Excerpt :

      Lucas et al. (2008) generated ensembles using NEMO (Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean; http://www.nemo-ocean.eu/; Madec, 2012), based on a configuration for the North Atlantic at 1/4° resolution and multivariate EOF modes. The ensemble capabilities of NEMO have been discussed in the literature following the SANGOMA (http://www.data-assimilation.net/) and OCCIPUT projects (Penduff et al., 2014), focusing on global and regional academic configurations spanning from 2° to 1/4° resolution and from seasonal to decadal time scales (Brankart, 2013; Brankart et al., 2015; Candille et al., 2015; Garnier et al., 2016; Bessières et al., 2017). In this paper, we configure, run and assess a stochastic ocean model in the Bay of Biscay, consisting of physical–biogeochemical ensemble simulations with the NEMO-PISCESv2 model (Pelagic Interactions Scheme for Carbon and Ecosystem Studies volume 2; Aumont et al., 2015), as a step towards coastal and regional data assimilation.

    • Diagnosing, modeling, and testing a multiplicative stochastic Gent-McWilliams parameterization

      2019, Ocean Modelling
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are a few other stochastic parameterizations for coarse GCMs that are not based on SPP or SPPT. These include the stochastic equation of state developed by Brankart (2013), and the addition of stochastic noise forcing to the temperature equation of a GCM by Williams et al. (2016). Grooms (2016) developed a framework for stochastic GM parameterizations and developed a preliminary non-Gaussian stochastic GM parameterization, albeit in an idealized model.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text