Elsevier

Nutrition

Volume 50, June 2018, Pages 74-81
Nutrition

Applied nutritional investigation
NutriCatt protocol in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program for colorectal surgery: The nutritional support improves clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2018.01.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay are major problems in surgery.

  • The ERAS program aims to ameliorate postoperative recovery, reducing complications, hospital stay, and consequently hospital costs.

  • A Nutritional Support in ERAS Program on Colorectal Cancer is proposed.

  • Clinical outcomes (postoperative complications and length of hospital stay) and cost effectiveness are improved.

  • If applied in large-volume centers adopting ERAS protocols, it may become a model to ameliorate care, further reducing hospital costs.

Abstract

Background

Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay (LOS) are major issues and affect hospital costs. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are effective in reducing morbidity and LOS after major surgery. We propose a nutritional protocol within ERAS programs in colorectal surgery, starting from preadmission.

Methods

We compared the ERAS + NutriCatt approach versus the ERAS standard program adopted in our center in the previous months. Complications, LOS, hospital readmission at 30 days, and late complications (at 90 days) were assessed and compared. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed.

Results

A total of 114 patients were treated according to the ERAS program between April 2015 and January 2016; 105 were enrolled in the ERAS + NutriCatt protocol from February to September 2016; Patients' characteristics were similar in the two groups, except for American Society of Anesthesiologists score, which was significantly worse in the ERAS + NutriCatt cohort; preoperative diagnoses and surgical approaches were similar in the two periods. LOS was significantly inferior in the ERAS + NutriCatt protocol (4.9 ± 1.7 d; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.60–5.28) compared with the standard ERAS program (6.1 ± 3.9 d, 95% CI 5.36–6.81) (P = 0.006), as were postoperative complications (36, 34.3% versus 55, 48.2%; P = 0.03). Complications within 90 d were 0 in ERAS + NutriCatt and 4 in the ERAS standard cohort. Cost-effectiveness analyses indicated savings in the ERAS + NutriCatt protocol.

Conclusions

Nutritional care, starting from the preadmission visit, is able to reduce LOS, postoperative and late complications, and costs, in addition to ERAS standard items in colorectal surgery.

Introduction

Postoperative complications (POC) and length of hospital stay (LOS) are emerging problems in major surgery [1], [2]. Accurate preoperative screenings and advances in mini-invasive surgical approaches have reduced mortality risk on the operating table [3]. However, more general factors such as comorbidities, nutritional status, advanced age, and pathophysiological response to surgery may still hamper the postoperative course, leading to drawbacks and increased hospitalization [4], [5], [6]. Therefore, many physicians are gathering in multidisciplinary networks adopting a new integrated and evidence-based method to enhance patients' recovery after surgery. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is an integrated program based on several evidence-based items, approaching the surgical patient in the perioperative period. It may involve surgeons, clinicians, anesthesiologists, dietitians, physiotherapists, and nurses. Its aim is to give the patient an early and better recovery after a surgical intervention, therefore lowering complications and LOS [7]. The first idea of applying evidence-based principles in colorectal surgery was launched in the early 1990s by Henrik Kehlet [8], [9]. He reported that length of hospital stay might be decreased 2 to 3 d in this way; ERAS programs have now been adopted in several surgical areas, and they have gained a high level of standardization. ERAS recommendations are collected in international guidelines in different surgical areas. Dietetic items were introduced into ERAS protocols to minimize both preoperative and postoperative fasting. These items recommends avoiding fasting in the preoperative phase, allowing clear fluids up to 2 h and solid food up to 6 h before the induction of anesthesia; a preoperative carbohydrate loading (12.5% weight/volume of maltodextrins in water) up to 2 h before surgery; and an early refeeding with common hospital food. These items lead to a better management of postoperative hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and catabolic response to stress [7]. Other ERAS items focus on surgical and anesthetic procedures, such as no drains, no bowel preparation, use of short-acting anesthetic agent and avoidance of salt and fluid overload [7], [10], [11], [12]. For a complete understanding of all ERAS items, we invite the reader to visit the website of the ERAS Society (www.erassociety.org).

Many reports have indicated that the adoption of ERAS protocols leads to better outcomes in terms of earlier recovery and discharge, postoperative morbidity, and hospital readmissions [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].

Recently, an oral or enteral nutritional support with ω-3 fatty acids, nucleotides, and arginine in the perioperative period has been reported to reduce POC and LOS in gastrointestinal surgery [10], [11], [12]. This support is now endorsed by international guidelines on nutrition in surgical and critically ill patients [19], [20], [21].

Worthy evidence suggests a role for nutrition in reducing surgically induced stress response, embedded into a multimodal program called “prehabilitation phase” [22]. Current guidelines of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) [21] on nutrition in surgery similarly state that patients at malnutrition risk should receive nutritional therapy before major surgery, preferably 10 to 14 d before. However, no dietary plans are to date proposed in the preadmission phase, nor in the perioperative or in the postoperative periods.

We propose an implementation of the ERAS nutritional protocol in colorectal surgery, introducing a nutritional evaluation and intervention before, during, and after hospital admission, in our center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, in Rome.

Aims of this work are as follows:

  • To describe an integrated nutritional approach within an ERAS program in colorectal cancer surgery

  • To verify if a nutritional support, starting in preadmission, is able to improve recovery after surgery and reduce complications, LOS, readmission at 30 d, and late complications.

  • To translate, in terms of cost effectiveness for the hospital and health care system, the clinical outcomes reached through this novel and multidisciplinary approach

Section snippets

Methods

We consecutively enrolled all cancer patients suitable for colorectal surgery in the general surgery division at our center from February to September 2016. These patients were treated according to ERAS program [6], implemented with a nutritional protocol that we called NutriCatt. It consists of several phases:

  • Preadmission (3 wk before admission): Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) 2002, anthropometric measures, and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) are carried out for each patient (BIA 101,

Results

A total of 105 patients were treated according to ERAS + NutriCatt protocol, compared with 114 patients of the previous ERAS cohort. Baseline characteristics of patients were similar in the two cohorts, except for the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. In the ERAS + NutriCatt cohort, in fact, the rate of patients with an ASA score of III was significantly higher. According to NRS 2002 [22], 22 patients (21%) were at risk of malnutrition (NRS 2002 ≥ 3); mean phase angle (±SD) was

Discussion

Compared with traditional management, the ERAS protocol represents a fundamental shift in colorectal surgery perioperative care, resulting in reduced rates of morbidity, faster recovery, and shorter LOS [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], so that ERAS protocols are highly recommended for elective colonic surgery.

This standard ERAS protocol was followed by our institution from April 2015 to January 2016, until the clinical nutrition unit introduced a modification, which we refer to as the

Conclusions

In a multidisciplinary context of excellence adopting the ERAS protocol, we found that a specific nutritional support, starting 2 to 3 wk before admission and continuing during and after hospitalization, may reduce length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, drug-associated costs for complications, and late (90-d) complications in colorectal surgery, even in patients with severe systemic diseases. This program could represent an advantage not only for the patients but also for the

References (37)

  • E. Vanhauwaert et al.

    Low-residue and low-fiber diets in gastrointestinal disease management

    Adv Nutr

    (2015)
  • M. Pisarska et al.

    Do we really need the full compliance with ERAS protocol in laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

    Clin Nutr ESPEN

    (2016)
  • R.C. Broderick et al.

    Increasing the value of healthcare: improving mortality while reducing cost in bariatric surgery

    Obes Surg

    (2015)
  • D. Chona et al.

    Predicting the post-operative length of stay for the orthopaedic trauma patient

    Int Orthop

    (2017)
  • J. Reoch et al.

    Safety of laparoscopic vs open bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Arch Surg

    (2011)
  • E.J. Hoppe et al.

    Urinary retention following colorectal surgery

    Am Surg

    (2017)
  • Y. Launey et al.

    Risk factors for mortality in postoperative peritonitis in critically ill patients

    World J Crit Care Med

    (2017)
  • U.O. Gustafsson et al.

    Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations

    World J Surg

    (2013)
  • Cited by (39)

    • The prognostic value of skeletal muscle index on clinical and survival outcomes after cytoreduction and HIPEC for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2022, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In other oncological surgical settings, clinical evidence highlights the role of a nutritional prehabilitation in ameliorating outcomes [43,45,46], and the combination of a personalized nutritional and physical conditioning seems to be useful [47–50], nevertheless the best strategy to improve a low skeletal muscle mass is still under debate [51–53]. In this context, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol, a multidisciplinary approach to better sustain the patient during the perioperative period, showed to ameliorate surgical, oncological, and survival outcomes [54–59]. The assessment of BC may play a relevant role also in those patients not suitable for CRS but who are candidates for palliative locoregional chemotherapy.

    • Nutritional Support in Lung Cancer Patients: The State of the Art

      2021, Clinical Lung Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      The main points in which nutrition is involved in the ERAS protocol applied to LC are summarized in Figure 1. In this context, there is growing interest in the prehabilitation phase before the start of an ERAS protocol.107 In resectable LC, several studies demonstrated that prehabilitation, including nutritional assessment/treatment and physical training before surgery, is safe and ameliorates respiratory testing; further, an improvement in nutritional status before surgery is also associated with reduction in postoperative complications, especially pneumonia, extrapulmonary infections, and air leakages.108-110

    • Phase angle is associated with length of hospital stay, readmissions, mortality, and falls in patients hospitalized in internal-medicine wards: A retrospective cohort study

      2021, Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the basis of the present observational findings, we obviously cannot provide a definitive answer; we can only affirm that in-hospital assessment of bioimpedance-derived PA could help clinicians identify patients at high risk of the worst outcomes. Moreover, results of previous studies have highlighted the possibility of obtaining an improvement in hospital management, in terms of postoperative complications, LOS, and hospital costs, after starting a hospital nutritional intervention in surgical colon-cancer patients [46]. Finally the present study underlines once again the clinical need for nutritional screening in hospitalized patients.

    • Muscle mass, assessed at diagnosis by L3-CT scan as a prognostic marker of clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2020, Clinical Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the era of multidisciplinary teams, given the availability of CT-scan images during tumor board meetings, identifying GC patients with low muscle mass at diagnosis or at follow up visit could be an innovative and useful practice. Indeed, recent evidences suggested that a personalized nutrition treatment is able to improve both clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes in at-risk of malnutrition cancer patients.[61–64] In conclusion, we found and confirmed, through a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, a prognostic negative role of the low muscle mass, assessed at L3 level by CT-scan, in GC therapy.

    • Combined usage of monosaccharides with polysaccharides may decelerate tumor growth and malignance versus solely using a certain kind of saccharide

      2020, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      The recommended energy intake is 25–30 kcal kg −1 d −1 for an adult [2], and over 50% of energy is supplied by carbohydrates. In addition, the preoperative oral solution, which containing at least 50g carbohydrate [13], is effective on providing patients with energy, eliminating discomfort feeling, stabilizing perioperative blood pressure and remitting IR [14,15]. Glucose, fructose and maltodextrin are the main carbohydrate components in clinical nutrition support, with dissimilar metabolic pathways and features.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

    View full text