Hopf bifurcations in general systems of Brusselator type

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2015.09.004Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper is concerned with general models of Brusselator type subject to the homogeneous Neumann boundary condition. The existence of Hopf bifurcation for the ODE and PDE models is obtained. By the center manifold theory and the normal form method, the bifurcation direction and stability of bifurcating periodic solutions are established. Moreover, some numerical simulations are shown to support the analytical results.

Introduction

Many physical, chemical, biological, environmental and even sociological processes are driven by reaction–diffusion systems. Turing  [1] showed that a system of coupled reaction–diffusion equations can be used to describe patterns and forms in biological systems. Turing’s theory shows that diffusion could destabilize an otherwise stable equilibrium of the reaction–diffusion system and lead to nonuniform spatial patterns. This kind of instability is usually called Turing instability or diffusion-driven instability.

Turing’s analysis stimulated considerable theoretical research on mathematical models of pattern formation, and a great deal of research has been devoted to the study of Turing instability in chemical and biology contexts. The Brusselator model was introduced in 1968 by Prigogine and Lefever  [2] as a model for a chemical oscillating reaction of self catalysis. It consists of the following four reaction steps: AX,B+XY+D,2X+Y3X,XE. The over-all reaction is A+BD+E. By some scaling and change of variable, the mathematical model corresponding to the Brusselator system is {utd1Δu=a(b+1)u+u2v,xΩ,t>0,vtd2Δv=buu2v,xΩ,t>0 subject to the homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions. Here ΩRN is a smooth and bounded domain, the unknowns u,v represent the concentration of the two reactants having the diffusion rates d1,d2>0, and a,b>0 are the fixed concentrations. Many scholars have investigated the Brusselator model and other models of Brusselator type. In paper  [3], the authors considered the following general Brusselator model {utd1Δu=a(b+1)u+upv,xΩ,t>0,vtd2Δv=buupv,xΩ,t>0 subject to the homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions, where p>0. Existence and non-existence of positive steady states are obtained. Pattern formation in system of Brusselator type is also investigated in  [4], [5]. In paper  [5], a more general Brusselator model {utd1Δu=a(b+1)u+f(u)v,xΩ,t>0,vtd2Δv=buf(u)v,xΩ,t>0,un=vn=0,xΩ,t>0,u(x,0)=u0(x)0,v(x,0)=v0(x)0,xΩ, is investigated. Here function fC1(0,)C[0,) is a non-decreasing function. The authors revealed the fact that the dynamics of the evolution system (1.1) and its associated steady-state is strongly related to the behavior of the nonlinearity f. The authors assumed that f is either sublinear or superlinear, and discussed Turning pattern. They pointed out the crucial role played by the nonlinearity f in the existence of Turing patterns. More precisely, they showed that if f has a sublinear growth, then no Turing patterns occur, while if f has a superlinear growth, then existence of such patterns is strongly related to the inter-dependence between the parameters a,b and the diffusion coefficients d1,d2.

In this paper, we shall consider the Hopf analysis in the problem (1.1). Concerning with the Hopf bifurcation analysis, in paper  [6], the authors discussed the following Brusselator model {utd1Δu=1(b+1)u+bu2v,xΩ,t>0,vtd2Δv=a2(uu2v),xΩ,t>0. Treating a as a bifurcation parameter, the authors derived the Hopf bifurcation phenomenon. The systems of Brusselator type have been extensively investigated in the last decades from both analytical and numerical point of view (see  [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]).

In this paper, we focus on the existence, stability and direction of Hopf bifurcation for problem (1.1) and its corresponding ordinary differential model. Employing the center manifold theory and normal method, an algorithm for determining the properties of the Hopf bifurcation is derived. Some numerical simulations for illustrating the analysis results are carried out. We refer to  [15], [16] for the detailed method used in this paper. We shall choose some parameter concerning with the function f as a Hopf bifurcation parameter, and aim to reveal the role of f in the existence of Hopf bifurcation. Our analysis will show that if f satisfies that af(a)f(a), then no Hopf bifurcation occurs, and while af(a)>f(a) holds, Hopf bifurcation emerges in ODE and PDE models. Compared with  [5], we discuss the same problem, but the content, assumption and conclusions are different. The ideal of the present paper is from  [17], and the authors discovered the general Glycolysis reaction–diffusion system with f.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section  2, Hopf bifurcation analysis of ODE system, including the existence and the stability, is obtained. In Section  3, for reaction–diffusion problem, we discuss the local stability of positive constant equilibrium, and derive the existence of Hopf bifurcation. Stability and direction of spatial Hopf bifurcation are given in Section  4. Numerical simulations are shown in Section  5.

Section snippets

Analysis of the local system

In this section, we first consider the local stability and the existence of Hopf bifurcation surrounding the positive constant solution of the following ODE {dudt=a(b+1)u+f(u)v,t>0,dvdt=buf(u)v,t>0.

It is easy to see that system (2.2) has a unique positive constant solution (u,v)=(a,abf(a)). Let λ=b+f(a), we fix parameter a and treat λ as a bifurcation parameter, then (u,v)=(a,a(λf(a))f(a)). Evidently, λ satisfies λ>f(a).

The Jacobi matrix of system (2.2) at (u,v)=(a,a(λf(a))f(a)) is L0(

Existence of Hopf bifurcation for reaction–diffusion problem

In this section, we mainly focus on the existence of spatially homogeneous and non-homogeneous periodic solutions bifurcating from the Hopf bifurcation of the reaction–diffusion problem (1.1). It is clear that (u,v) is the unique positive constant equilibrium and we also treat λ as the bifurcation parameter.

Now we define the real-valued Sobolev space X={(u,v)[H2(Ω)]2:un|Ω=vn|Ω=0} and the complexification of X: X=XiX={u1+iu2:u1,u2X}.

The linearized operator of system (1.1) evaluated at

Stability and direction of spatial Hopf bifurcation

In this section, we shall follow the methods in  [15], [16] to calculate the direction of Hopf bifurcation and stability of the bifurcating periodic orbits when λ=λHj(j=0,1,,n0). We adopt the same notations and computations as  [15], [16]. For complicity, we choose that Ω=(0,lπ). We have the following result.

Theorem 4.1

For problem   (1.1), the bifurcation from λ=λHj(j=0,1,,n0) is supercritical (resp. subcritical), and the bifurcating spatially periodic solutions are stable (resp. unstable) if Re(c1(λHj)

Numerical simulations

In this section, we will illustrate the conclusions we have obtained. Here we take system (1.1), (2.2) with f(u)=u2 for example.

For ODE model (2.2), we choose a=1, and the critical point λ̄0=3. From Theorem 2.1(2), we know that when f(a)<λ<λ̄0,(u,v) is locally asymptotically stable, and a Hopf bifurcation occurs at λ=λ̄0, the direction of the bifurcation is subcritical and the bifurcating periodic solutions are asymptotically stable. These are shown in Fig. 1, where the initial condition is

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NSFC Grant 11501572 and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (15CX02076A).

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (28)

  • Spatiotemporal patterns and bifurcations with degeneration in a symmetry glycolysis model

    2022, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
  • Stability and Hopf Bifurcation in the General Langford System

    2023, Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text