Spatial and temporal beam profile monitor with nanosecond resolution for CERN's Linac4 and Superconducting Proton Linac
Introduction
The planned Linac4 facility [1], [2] of CERN will provide beams of energy and a high intensity . This beam will be sequentially accelerated by the CERN Proton Synchrotron Booster (PSB), Proton Synchrotron (PS), and Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS), before being injected into the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) for proton–proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy . Linac4 is important in achieving [3] the highest possible beam current () in the LHC. The beam intensity delivered to LHC can be further increased by factor , by replacing the PSB and PS with a 4–5-GeV Superconducting Proton Linac (SPL) [4] and a 50-GeV PS2 [3]. The first section of Linac4, which accelerates the beam to and chops its time structure (Fig. 1), is now being constructed at CERN. In this paper, we describe a monitor which characterizes the time evolution of the spatial profile of this beam. It is based on the imaging of secondary electrons emitted from a thin target foil.
In the planned design of Linac4 (Table 1, Fig. 1), a beam of energy is extracted from a duoplasmatron source and traverses a Low-Energy Beam Transport (LEBT). It is then accelerated to in a Radiofrequency Quadrupole (RFQ) which is excited at frequency . The beam exiting the RFQ output consists of macro-pulses of duration and current which arrive at a repetition rate , corresponding to an average beam current . Each macro-pulse consists of a train of 500-ps-long micro-bunches that are spaced by intervals . Each macro-pulse and micro-bunch, respectively contain and ions (Table 1). This beam is further accelerated to by traversing the Drift Tube Linac (DTL), Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac (CCDTL), and Pi-Mode Structure Linac (PIMS). It is then injected into the PSB using a charge-exchange method [5].
During the acceleration phase for Linac4 injection into PSB, a beam chopper [1], [6] positioned downstream of the RFQ removes 133 consecutive micro-bunches out of every 352 in the beam. It is here crucial to remove all the ions in these bunches, as the ions would otherwise fall outside the longitudinal acceptance of the PSB, strike its inner walls, and activate the accelerator.
The precise control of the transverse beam profile is also important for proper acceleration of the beam. At the high intensities of Linac4, a variety of (e.g., space-charge and resonant oscillation) effects can easily cause halos [7], [8], [9] to form around the core of the beam. These effects will be especially strong during the first stages of the acceleration to in the RFQ [1]. Simulations [10], [11] predict that the halo at the RFQ exit would constitute of the main beam. Unless this halo is properly diagnosed and removed, it will be accelerated with the main beam, eventually striking the walls of the accelerator, and thereby leading to further activation.
The monitor described herein will measure the spatial and time profiles of the 3-MeV beam, to diagnose whether or not they satisfy the above criteria on the beam chopping and halo. For this task a monitor of high time and spatial resolution ( and ), large dynamic range (), and active area is needed. The monitor must be robust, so that it can be routinely operated with minimum maintenance.
If Linac4 is to be used in conjunction with the future SPL, its beam quality must be even higher than that described above in terms of beam halo and timing structure [4]. The chopper frequency will here be increased, so that three consecutive micro-bunches out of every eight are removed. Experiments at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) linac of ORNL [9], [12] have revealed that any beam loss at such a facility must be kept below a value equivalent to power dissipated per meter of accelerator, if the activation is to be maintained within acceptable limits. Simulations show that this corresponds to less than ions lost per micro-bunch, in the halo and chopped part of the Linac4 beam [1]. For the monitor to properly diagnose this, it must detect a weak pulse containing ions, without being blinded by the much stronger pulse of ions that lies nearby. This is difficult, since the two pulses are here temporally and spatially separated by only and . In this paper, we also studied whether the monitor can be used in this SPL-quality beam.
Linac4 is in the early stages of construction, and beams of comparable energy, intensity, and time structure were not readily available to us. We, therefore, tested the monitor by irradiating the target foil with UV laser pulses of short duration, and imaging the photoelectrons that were emitted, the laser intensity being adjusted to generate the electron flux ( emitted per micro-bunch) expected at Linac4. The monitor was also tested against 3-MeV proton beams of low intensity (between and particles per micro-bunch), which simulated the halo of the Linac4 beam.
Beam monitors based on secondary electron emission from wire electrodes [13] are now used at the Antiproton Decelerator (AD) of CERN to measure the profiles of beam pulses containing antiprotons, with energies between [14] and 5 MeV [15]. These wire monitors [13] measured the spatial profile by intercepting of the beam, while allowing most of the antiprotons to pass through without degradation. These devices, however, are unable to measure low beam intensities . The foil monitor described in this paper has a much higher sensitivity and dynamic range. It may thus be preferable to use them in some beamlines, at the future Extra Low Energy Antiproton Ring (ELENA) [16], [17] at CERN, or Facility for Low-energy Antiproton and Ion Research (FLAIR) [18] at GSI.
Section snippets
Monitor principle
In the present monitor, the ions were allowed to strike a carbon foil of thickness (Fig. 2). The secondary electrons emitted from the foil were moved out of the path of the beam [19], [20], [21] and collected on a phosphor screen [22], [23]. The image of the resulting scintillation light propagated along a fiber optic conduit [24] and was photographed by a Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) camera. CCDs and phosphor screens are normally used as integration devices because of their
Monitor construction
The monitor (Fig. 2) was housed in a rectangular vacuum chamber made of type 316L non-magnetic stainless steel. The length of the monitor along the beam path was kept as short as possible , so that any adiabatic increase in the emittance of the beam traveling through the monitor would be minimized. Before operation, the chamber was baked to temperature . Turbo and ion pumps of pumping speed and were then used to reach a vacuum . A
Monitor operation
In Fig. 4, a schematic diagram of the electronics used to apply pulsed and DC voltages sequentially to the monitor electrodes are shown. Table 2 lists three settings 1–3 of the potentials, which were applied to the carbon foil (denoted by ), grids A–E (denoted by ), and the phosphor screen () during each sequence. Henceforth, we take the example of the voltage settings three in Table 2 to describe the monitor operation.
The sequence proceeded as follows: (i) CCD exposure start, the
Generation of sub-nanosecond UV laser pulses
We next generated UV laser pulses of energy , wavelength , and pulse length , to simulate the time structure of the micro-bunches in Linac4. Since the Q-switch Nd:YAG laser (Coherent Infinity) used here produced 4-ns-long laser pulses, we used a stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) cell [63], [64], [65] to temporally compress them. This laser system (Fig. 7) was originally designed [66] for use in laser spectroscopy experiments of antiprotonic helium atoms [67] and ions [68]
Measurements with UV laser beam
We next replaced the carbon target foil of Fig. 2 with the gold photocathode described above, and irradiated it with the UV laser beam to generate photoelectrons. This simulated the monitor response against the secondary electrons produced by the Linac4 beam. The gold photocathode was cleaned before use by (i) placing it in an ultrasonic bath filled with acetone, (ii) heating it to temperature in vacuum for several hours, (iii) cooling it to room temperature and evacuating it to
Measurements with proton beam
We next carried out an experiment using the tandem facility of the Institut de Physique Nucléaire, Orsay, to study the response of the monitor against a 3-MeV proton beam. The tandem provided 5-ns-long micro-bunches containing protons, which arrived at the monitor with a repetition rate . During the measurements described below, the acceleration grids and phosphor screen were gated on for duration , repetitively and in synchronization with the micro-bunch arrivals. The
Conclusions and discussions
We have described a beam profile monitor which imaged the secondary electrons emitted from a thin target foil, using a phosphor screen and CCD. Systematic measurements indicated that the monitor satisfied the requirements for use in the 3-MeV beam of the planned Linac4 RFQ. The monitor constituted a “stop motion camera” for beams with nanosecond-scale time structures. Its response against UV laser pulses of 700-ps duration which released between and photoelectrons from the foil
Acknowledgements
We are deeply indebted to F. Caspers, A. Dax, R. Garoby, J.D. Hares, R.S. Hayano, T. Komaba, J.-B. Lallement, T. Lefevre, A. Lombardi, M. Mitani, C. Rossi, E.Z. Sargsyan, A. Sótér, and M. Vretenar for their invaluable help and encouragement. The construction and tests of the monitor using the UV laser beam were carried out at the ASACUSA beamline of CERN's Antiproton Decelerator. We thank the Tandem staff of IPN, Orsay for their great efforts in providing a stable proton beam. This work was
References (83)
- et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
(1988) - et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
(2000) - et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
(2000) Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
(2000)- et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
(2003) - et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
(1991) - et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
(1996) Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
(2005)- et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
(1991) - et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A
(2002)