Spatial and temporal beam profile monitor with nanosecond resolution for CERN's Linac4 and Superconducting Proton Linac

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.01.078Get rights and content

Abstract

The Linac4, now being developed at CERN, will provide 160-MeV H- beams of high intensity N=2×1014ionss-1. Before this beam can be injected into the CERN Proton Synchrotron Booster or future Superconducting Proton Linac for further acceleration, some sequences of 500-ps-long micro-bunches must be removed from it, using a beam chopper. These bunches, if left in the beam, would fall outside the longitudinal acceptance of the accelerators and make them radioactive. We developed a monitor to measure the time structure and spatial profile of this chopped beam, with respective resolutions Δt1ns and Δx2mm. Its large active area 40mm×40mm and dynamic range also allows investigations of beam halos. The ion beam first struck a carbon foil, and secondary electrons emerging from the foil were accelerated by a series of parallel grid electrodes. These electrons struck a phosphor screen, and the resulting image of the scintillation light was guided to a thermoelectrically cooled, charge-coupled device camera. The time resolution was attained by applying high-voltage pulses of sub-nanosecond rise and fall times to the grids. The monitor has been tested with 700-ps-long UV laser pulses, and a 3-MeV proton beam. Its response over a wide range of beam intensities between Ne5 and 4×108 electrons emitted from the foil per pulse was studied. The monitor can also be used to measure the profiles of antiproton beams in the future facilities of Facility for Low-energy Antiproton Ion Research (FLAIR) or Extra Low Energy Antiproton Ring (ELENA).

Introduction

The planned Linac4 facility [1], [2] of CERN will provide H- beams of energy E=160MeV and a high intensity N=2×1014ionss-1. This beam will be sequentially accelerated by the CERN Proton Synchrotron Booster (PSB), Proton Synchrotron (PS), and Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS), before being injected into the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) for proton–proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy E=14TeV. Linac4 is important in achieving [3] the highest possible beam current (I0.9A) in the LHC. The beam intensity delivered to LHC can be further increased by factor 2, by replacing the PSB and PS with a 4–5-GeV Superconducting Proton Linac (SPL) [4] and a 50-GeV PS2 [3]. The first section of Linac4, which accelerates the beam to E=3MeV and chops its time structure (Fig. 1), is now being constructed at CERN. In this paper, we describe a monitor which characterizes the time evolution of the spatial profile of this beam. It is based on the imaging of secondary electrons emitted from a thin target foil.

In the planned design of Linac4 (Table 1, Fig. 1), a H- beam of energy E=45keV is extracted from a duoplasmatron source and traverses a Low-Energy Beam Transport (LEBT). It is then accelerated to E=3MeV in a Radiofrequency Quadrupole (RFQ) which is excited at frequency fe=352.2MHz. The beam exiting the RFQ output consists of macro-pulses of duration Δtm=400μs and current Im=70mA which arrive at a repetition rate fr=2Hz, corresponding to an average beam current Ia=ImΔtmfr60μA. Each macro-pulse consists of a train of 500-ps-long micro-bunches that are spaced by intervals fe-1=2.8ns. Each macro-pulse and micro-bunch, respectively contain 1014 and 109 H- ions (Table 1). This beam is further accelerated to E=160MeV by traversing the Drift Tube Linac (DTL), Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac (CCDTL), and Pi-Mode Structure Linac (PIMS). It is then injected into the PSB using a charge-exchange method [5].

During the acceleration phase for Linac4 injection into PSB, a beam chopper [1], [6] positioned downstream of the RFQ removes 133 consecutive micro-bunches out of every 352 in the beam. It is here crucial to remove all the ions in these bunches, as the ions would otherwise fall outside the longitudinal acceptance of the PSB, strike its inner walls, and activate the accelerator.

The precise control of the transverse beam profile is also important for proper acceleration of the beam. At the high intensities of Linac4, a variety of (e.g., space-charge and resonant oscillation) effects can easily cause halos [7], [8], [9] to form around the core of the beam. These effects will be especially strong during the first stages of the acceleration to E=3MeV in the RFQ [1]. Simulations [10], [11] predict that the halo at the RFQ exit would constitute 10-4 of the main beam. Unless this halo is properly diagnosed and removed, it will be accelerated with the main beam, eventually striking the walls of the accelerator, and thereby leading to further activation.

The monitor described herein will measure the spatial and time profiles of the 3-MeV beam, to diagnose whether or not they satisfy the above criteria on the beam chopping and halo. For this task a monitor of high time and spatial resolution (Δt1ns and Δx2mm), large dynamic range (>105), and active area (40mm×40mm) is needed. The monitor must be robust, so that it can be routinely operated with minimum maintenance.

If Linac4 is to be used in conjunction with the future SPL, its beam quality must be even higher than that described above in terms of beam halo and timing structure [4]. The chopper frequency will here be increased, so that three consecutive micro-bunches out of every eight are removed. Experiments at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) linac of ORNL [9], [12] have revealed that any beam loss at such a facility must be kept below a value equivalent to power P=1W dissipated per meter of accelerator, if the activation is to be maintained within acceptable limits. Simulations show that this corresponds to less than 103 ions lost per micro-bunch, in the halo and chopped part of the Linac4 beam [1]. For the monitor to properly diagnose this, it must detect a weak pulse containing 103 ions, without being blinded by the much stronger pulse of 109 ions that lies nearby. This is difficult, since the two pulses are here temporally and spatially separated by only fe-1=2.8ns and 10mm. In this paper, we also studied whether the monitor can be used in this SPL-quality beam.

Linac4 is in the early stages of construction, and H- beams of comparable energy, intensity, and time structure were not readily available to us. We, therefore, tested the monitor by irradiating the target foil with UV laser pulses of short (Δt700ps) duration, and imaging the photoelectrons that were emitted, the laser intensity being adjusted to generate the electron flux (Ne4×108 emitted per micro-bunch) expected at Linac4. The monitor was also tested against 3-MeV proton beams of low intensity (between Np=10 and 6×104 particles per micro-bunch), which simulated the halo of the Linac4 beam.

Beam monitors based on secondary electron emission from wire electrodes [13] are now used at the Antiproton Decelerator (AD) of CERN to measure the profiles of beam pulses containing Np¯106107 antiprotons, with energies between E=100keV [14] and 5 MeV [15]. These wire monitors [13] measured the spatial profile by intercepting 2% of the beam, while allowing most of the antiprotons to pass through without degradation. These devices, however, are unable to measure low beam intensities Np¯<104. The foil monitor described in this paper has a much higher sensitivity and dynamic range. It may thus be preferable to use them in some beamlines, at the future Extra Low Energy Antiproton Ring (ELENA) [16], [17] at CERN, or Facility for Low-energy Antiproton and Ion Research (FLAIR) [18] at GSI.

Section snippets

Monitor principle

In the present monitor, the H- ions were allowed to strike a carbon foil of thickness td=50μgcm-2 (Fig. 2). The secondary electrons emitted from the foil were moved out of the path of the H- beam [19], [20], [21] and collected on a phosphor screen [22], [23]. The image of the resulting scintillation light propagated along a fiber optic conduit [24] and was photographed by a Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) camera. CCDs and phosphor screens are normally used as integration devices because of their

Monitor construction

The monitor (Fig. 2) was housed in a 490mm×460mm×260mm rectangular vacuum chamber made of type 316L non-magnetic stainless steel. The length of the monitor along the beam path was kept as short as possible (l=260mm), so that any adiabatic increase in the emittance of the H- beam traveling through the monitor would be minimized. Before operation, the chamber was baked to temperature T=70C. Turbo and ion pumps of pumping speed s=300 and 600ls-1 were then used to reach a vacuum P5×10-7Pa. A

Monitor operation

In Fig. 4, a schematic diagram of the electronics used to apply pulsed and DC voltages sequentially to the monitor electrodes are shown. Table 2 lists three settings 1–3 of the potentials, which were applied to the carbon foil (denoted by Vf), grids A–E (denoted by VAVE), and the phosphor screen (Vp) during each sequence. Henceforth, we take the example of the voltage settings three in Table 2 to describe the monitor operation.

The sequence proceeded as follows: (i) CCD exposure start, the

Generation of sub-nanosecond UV laser pulses

We next generated UV laser pulses of energy E5mJ, wavelength λ=266nm, and pulse length Δt700ps, to simulate the time structure of the micro-bunches in Linac4. Since the Q-switch Nd:YAG laser (Coherent Infinity) used here produced 4-ns-long laser pulses, we used a stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) cell [63], [64], [65] to temporally compress them. This laser system (Fig. 7) was originally designed [66] for use in laser spectroscopy experiments of antiprotonic helium atoms [67] and ions [68]

Measurements with UV laser beam

We next replaced the carbon target foil of Fig. 2 with the gold photocathode described above, and irradiated it with the UV laser beam to generate photoelectrons. This simulated the monitor response against the secondary electrons produced by the Linac4 beam. The gold photocathode was cleaned before use by (i) placing it in an ultrasonic bath filled with acetone, (ii) heating it to temperature T=100C in vacuum for several hours, (iii) cooling it to room temperature and evacuating it to

Measurements with proton beam

We next carried out an experiment using the tandem facility of the Institut de Physique Nucléaire, Orsay, to study the response of the monitor against a 3-MeV proton beam. The tandem provided 5-ns-long micro-bunches containing Np=5×104 protons, which arrived at the monitor with a repetition rate fr=10MHz. During the measurements described below, the acceleration grids and phosphor screen were gated on for duration Δt=1ns, repetitively and in synchronization with the micro-bunch arrivals. The

Conclusions and discussions

We have described a beam profile monitor which imaged the secondary electrons emitted from a thin target foil, using a phosphor screen and CCD. Systematic measurements indicated that the monitor satisfied the requirements for use in the 3-MeV beam of the planned Linac4 RFQ. The monitor constituted a “stop motion camera” for beams with nanosecond-scale time structures. Its response against UV laser pulses of 700-ps duration which released between Ne2×107 and 4×108 photoelectrons from the foil

Acknowledgements

We are deeply indebted to F. Caspers, A. Dax, R. Garoby, J.D. Hares, R.S. Hayano, T. Komaba, J.-B. Lallement, T. Lefevre, A. Lombardi, M. Mitani, C. Rossi, E.Z. Sargsyan, A. Sótér, and M. Vretenar for their invaluable help and encouragement. The construction and tests of the monitor using the UV laser beam were carried out at the ASACUSA beamline of CERN's Antiproton Decelerator. We thank the Tandem staff of IPN, Orsay for their great efforts in providing a stable proton beam. This work was

References (83)

  • A.N. James et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1988)
  • D. Shapira et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2000)
  • D. Shapira et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2000)
  • A.R. Faruqi

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2000)
  • M. Hori et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2003)
  • Z. Yingji et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1991)
  • O.H. Odland et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1996)
  • G. Montagnoli

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2005)
  • O.H.W. Siegmund et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1991)
  • O. Jagutzki et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2002)
  • P.V. Schmidt et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1996)
  • J.S. Lapington

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1997)
  • S. Coeck et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2006)
  • R. Connolly et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2000)
  • J. Amundson et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2007)
  • M. Hori

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2004)
  • P. Elmfors et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1997)
  • S. Igarashi et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2002)
  • J.H. Chappell et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth.

    (1984)
  • J.P. Moy et al.

    Nucl. Instr. Meth. A

    (1993)
  • G.C. Tyrrell

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2005)
  • S. Ohsuka et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1997)
  • R. Staubert et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth.

    (1970)
  • S.J. Hall et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth.

    (1973)
  • R. Mirzoyan et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1997)
  • L. Arnaudon, et al., Linac4 Technical Design Report, CERN-AB-2006-084 ABP/RF, CERN, Geneva,...
  • C. Rossi, L. Bruno, F. Caspers, R. Garoby, J. Genest, K. Hanke, M. Hori, D. Kuchler, A. Lombardi, M. Magistris, A....
  • M. Vretenar, G. Bellodi, R. Garoby, F. Gerigk, K. Hanke, A.M. Lombardi, S. Maury, M. Pasini, C. Rossi, E.Z. Sargsyan,...
  • F. Gerigk, et al., Conceptual design of the SPL II—a high-power superconducting H- linac at CERN, CERN-2006-006, CERN,...
  • W. Weterings, G. Bellodi, J. Borburgh, T. Fowler, F. Gerigk, B. Goddard, K. Hanke, M. Martini, L. Sermeus, 160MeV H-...
  • T. Kroyer, F. Caspers, E. Mahner, The CERN SPL Chopper Structure—a Status Report, CARE-Report-2006-033-HIPPI, CERN,...
  • C.K. Allen et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2002)
  • T.P. Wangler et al.

    Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams

    (1998)
  • D. Jeon et al.

    Phys. Rev. St Accel. Beams

    (2002)
  • R. Ferdinand, P.-Y. Beauvais, R. Duperrier, A. France, J. Gaiffier, J.-M. Lagniel, M. Painchault, F. Simoens, P....
  • A.M. Lombardi, E.Z. Sargsyan, S. Lanzone, J.-B. Lallement, G. Bellodi, M. Baylac, R. Duperrier, D. Uriot, End-to-end...
  • J. Wei, The spallation neutron source project—physical and technical challenges, in: Proceedings of the 2002 European...
  • M. Hori

    Rev. Sci. Instrum.

    (2005)
  • M. Hori et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2003)
  • M. Hori et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2001)
  • P. Belochitskii, Status of the antiproton decelerator and of the ELENA project at CERN, in: Proceedings of COOL 2007,...
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text