ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Neuroscience
Volume 148, Issue 2, 24 August 2007, Pages 454-460
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (200 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.06.008    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2007 IBRO Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Clinical neuroscience

Lack of RIC-3 congruence with β2 subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in bipolar disorder

E.G. SeveranceCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author and R.H. Yolkena

aStanley Division of Developmental Neurovirology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Blalock 1105, Baltimore, MD 21287-4933, USA

Accepted 11 June 2007. 
Available online 19 July 2007.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) dysfunction occurs in individuals with schizophrenia (SZ) and may also affect individuals with bipolar disorder (BP). The molecular mechanisms for these disease-associated cholinergic deficits are not known. In vitro, the protein RIC-3 (resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase-3) aids the assembly and trafficking of α7-nAChRs but has unclear action on the biogenesis of α4/β2-nAChRs. To evaluate RIC-3/nAChR dynamics in diseased and normal human brain tissue, we measured RIC-3, α7-, α4- and β2-nAChRs transcript levels in postmortem prefrontal cortex of individuals with SZ (n=31), BP (n=28) and unaffected controls (NC, n=33). Of the 28 individuals with BP, 20 had a history of psychotic symptoms. We compared relative message abundances between diagnostic groups and tested correlations of RIC-3 with each nAChR message subtype. RIC-3 and α4 messages were significantly increased in BP compared with NC (RIC-3, P≤0.002; α4, P≤0.04). RIC-3 message was also upregulated in SZ (P≤0.04). In BP with psychoses, RIC-3 and α4 levels were increased compared with BP without psychoses (both P≤0.02) and compared with NC (RIC-3, P≤0.0003; α4, P≤0.004). In correlation regression analyses, RIC-3 expression was very highly correlated to α7, α4 and β2 in NC (α7, P≤2.5e-05; α4, P≤2.5e-09; β2, P≤0.003) and in SZ (α7, P≤1e-07; α4, P≤7e-07; β2, P≤3e-09). RIC-3 also strongly correlated with α7 and α4 in BP (α7, P≤0.003; α4, P≤3.5e-07). RIC-3 was modestly correlated with β2 in BP overall (P≤0.04), but showed no significant correlation in BP with psychoses (P≤0.31) compared with a significant correlation in BP without psychoses (P≤0.007). In conclusion, coordinated RIC-3/α4 upregulation and discordant RIC-3/β2 levels suggest that α4/β2 nAChR deficits in BP may occur from dysregulated RIC-3 chaperoning of the β2 nAChR subunit in a subset of patients affected by psychotic features.

Key words: human RIC3 protein; alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptor; alpha7 nicotinic receptor; nicotine; antipsychotic agents

Abbreviations: ABI, Applied Biosystems; BP, bipolar disorder; CHRNA4, alpha4 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; CHRNA7, alpha7 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; CHRNB2, beta2 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; nAChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; NC, normal control; pmi, postmortem interval; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; RIC-3, resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase-3; SZ, schizophrenia

Article Outline

Experimental procedures
Results
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References




Neuroscience
Volume 148, Issue 2, 24 August 2007, Pages 454-460
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.