ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Neuropsychologia
Volume 44, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 489-506
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (442 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.014    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Recollection and familiarity in dense hippocampal amnesia: A case study

Lisa Cipolottia, b, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Chris Birdc, Tina Goodd, David Macmanuse, Peter Rudgea and Tim Shallicec, f

aDepartment of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK bDipartimento di Psicologia, University of Palermo, Italy cInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK dWellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London eNMR Research Unit, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London fSISSA, University of Trieste, Italy

Received 17 December 2004; 
revised 16 May 2005; 
accepted 17 May 2005. 
Available online 14 July 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

In the amnesia literature, disagreement exists over whether anterograde amnesia involves recollective-based recognition processes and/or familiarity-based ones depending on whether the anatomical damage is restricted to the hippocampus or also involves adjacent areas, particularly the entorhinal and perirhinal cortices. So far, few patients with well documented anatomical lesions and detailed assessment of recollective and recognition performance have been described. We report a comprehensive neuroanatomical assessment and detailed investigation of the anterograde memory functions of a previously described severe amnesic patient (VC). The results of four previously published neuroradiological investigations (resting PET, qualitative MRIs, volumetric MRI and functional MRI) together with the results of two new investigations (voxel-based morphometry and magnetic resonance spectroscopy) are presented. The consistent finding across these different qualitative and quantitative examinations of VC's brain has shown that there is primarily structural and functional abnormality located selectively in the hippocampus bilaterally. Marked impairments in both verbal and non-verbal recall and recognition standardized memory tests were documented in the context of VC's intact cognitive profile and normal semantic memory. The results of five new experimental recognition memory tests tapping recollection and familiarity using verbal, topographical (buildings and landscapes) and unknown human faces memoranda revealed striking differential effects according to the type of stimuli used. A receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that VC's recollective- and familiarity-based recognition processes were well preserved for unknown human faces. In contrast, recollective-based recognition for verbal and topographical material was at floor. Familiarity-based recognition was also impaired, significantly below controls for verbal and buildings memoranda and quite weak, although not reaching significance, for landscapes. These data suggest that the hippocampus is involved in recollective processes of verbal and topographical stimuli. It also plays an appreciable role in familiarity processes for these stimuli. However, recollection and familiarity of human faces appear not to depend on this region.

Keywords: Hippocampus; Perirhinal cortex; Recognition memory; Amnesia; Recollection; Familiarity

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Case description
3. Neuroradiological findings
3.1. Resting PET
3.2. MRI findings
3.3. Volumetric MRI findings
3.4. Functional MRI findings
3.5. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM)
3.5.1. Controls
3.5.2. MRI scanning
3.5.3. VBM analysis
3.5.4. VBM statistical analysis
3.5.5. Results
3.6. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy findings
3.6.1. Results
4. General cognitive tasks
5. Semantic memory tasks
5.1. Picture naming
5.2. Category fluency
5.3. Comprehension
6. Recognition and recall memory tasks
6.1. The Doors and People task
7. Five new verbal and non-verbal recognition memory tests and receiver operating characteristics analysis (ROCs)
7.1. Controls
7.2. Materials
7.3. Procedure
7.4. Design
7.5. Analyses
7.6. Results
8. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References







 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.