ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Neuropsychologia
Volume 44, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 140-149
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (206 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.027    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Rapid response learning in amnesia: Delineating associative learning components in repetition priming

David M. Schnyera, b, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Ian G. Dobbinsc, Lindsay Nichollsa, Daniel L. Schacterd and Mieke Verfaelliea

aMemory Disorders Research Center, Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston University School of Medicine (151A), 150 South Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02130-4817, USA bAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, MGH/MIT/HMS, MA 02301, USA cPsychological and Brain Sciences, Duke University, NC 27708, USA dDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, MA 02138, USA

Received 2 December 2004; 
revised 17 March 2005; 
accepted 22 March 2005. 
Available online 11 May 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Functional brain imaging studies of priming assume that the behavioral facilitation and activity reductions resulting from multiple repetitions reflect the continued tuning of processes engaged during the initial processing of items. Utilizing an object priming paradigm in which participants were asked to make relative size judgments about visually presented common objects, we tested an alternate hypothesis that states that with multiple repetitions participants come to rely on a more efficient response learning mechanism. In experiment 1, the decision cue was inverted such that previous judgments made either once or three times were rendered invalid. Decision inversion resulted in a reduction of all priming, but most critically, led to a reduction of multiple-repetition priming to the level of single-repetition priming. In experiment 2, patients with amnesia failed to show a priming advantage for multiple repetitions, indicating that response learning is dependent on the medial temporal lobes. Taken together, these results suggest that a different process increasingly mediates priming behavior as repetitions increase. With repeated exposure, behavioral facilitation rapidly comes to reflect a more efficient response learning mechanism rather than facilitated access to object knowledge.

Keywords: Priming; Memory; Learning; Amnesia

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Experiment 1
2.1. Method
2.1.1. Participants
2.1.2. Stimuli
2.1.3. Procedure
2.2. Results
2.2.1. Response latency
2.2.1.1. Cue switching
2.2.1.2. Early versus late switch
2.2.1.3. Return to the original decision cue
2.2.2. Response accuracy
2.3. Discussion
3. Experiment 2
3.1. Method
3.1.1. Participants
3.1.2. Stimuli and procedure
3.2. Results
3.2.1. Response latency
3.2.1.1. Cue switching
3.2.1.2. Early versus late switch
3.2.1.3. Return to the original decision cue
3.2.2. Response accuracy
3.3. Discussion
4. General discussion
Acknowledgements
References


 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.