Regional gray matter density is associated with morningness–eveningness: Evidence from voxel-based morphometry
Introduction
The continuum of diurnal preference or “morningness–eveningness” refers to individual differences in the timing of circadian sleep–wake cycles and subjective alertness throughout the day (Killgore and Killgore, 2007). It has been suggested that approximately 50% of individual variability in morningness–eveningness is affected by genetic factors (Hur and Lykken, 1998) including polymorphisms in circadian clock-relevant genes (Takahashi et al., 2008), suggesting the robust innate basis of this measure. The negative feedback loops associated with the expression of these genes form the circadian rhythm (e.g., Darlington et al., 1998, Jin et al., 1999) and polymorphisms in these genes affect the length of circadian rhythms (e.g., Katzenberg et al., 1998). These genes are widely expressed, but particularly enriched in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, and neuronal activity in this area plays a central role in coordinating circadian rhythms (Inouye and Kawamura, 1982). Performance and neural activity changes in this area, which are related to interactions between time of day and morningness–eveningness, have been previously investigated in humans (Schmidt et al., 2009).
There are several measurements of morningness–eveningness. One of the representative meth The most widely used instrument is the Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), which is a self-report measure (Horne and Ostberg, 1976). We focused on this scale as a method to measure morningness-eveningness in this study. This scale contains questions about feelings and behaviors that are related to sleep, peak performance, and other circadian functions. The reliability of MEQ, as measured by Cronbach's coefficient of alpha was .89. Moreover, MEQ has been shown to be a valid indicator of circadian arousal (Smith et al., 1989), and a higher MEQ score has been shown to be associated with an earlier time of the lowest body temperature (Baehr et al., 2000) as well as an earlier time of waking (Baehr et al., 2000) and a shorter intrinsic circadian period (Duffy et al., 2001), as predicted theoretically. These findings demonstrate the criterion-related validity of the test. In addition, it should be noted that the MEQ score and the concept of morningness–eveningness reflect not only circadian processes but also homeostatic processes (Mongrain et al., 2006). For example, subjects with morningness tend to show faster dissipation of sleep pressure during sleep, while buildup of sleep pressure during wakefulness is slower in subjects with eveningness (Mongrain et al., 2006, Taillard et al., 2003).
On the other hand, it is also well established that there is another aspect to individual characteristics of morningness–eveningness that exists regardless of the time of day. First, morningness–eveningness has been associated with biological factors such as sex (Adan and Natale, 2002) and age (Randler and Saliger, 2011). These are biological factors that are likely to affect morningness–eveningness. Morningness has also been associated with personality and temperament, especially cognitive components associated with self-discipline and pro-social behaviors such as high conscientiousness, high self-directedness, low impulsiveness, and high cooperativeness and agreeableness (Lee et al., 2012, Randler, 2008, Randler and Saliger, 2011). At least some of these factors, particularly those related to discipline, may be associated with morningness because a well-disciplined lifestyle may lead to morningness (Díaz-Morales et al., 2008). Second, eveningness has been associated with greater higher-order cognitive abilities such as higher psychometric intelligence and higher working memory capacity even when these are assessed in the morning (Piffer et al., 2014, Roberts and Kyllonen, 1999) despite low academic performance (Díaz-Morales and Escribano, 2013, Randler and Frech, 2006). The causal mechanisms underlying these associations are not clear; however, one speculation is that a third factor such as the basic arousal level leads to both higher cognitive abilities and eveningness. Third, eveningness has been associated with traits or states linked to worse mood such as higher harm avoidance, higher neuroticism, and more suicide attempts (Lee et al., 2012, Randler, 2008, Randler and Saliger, 2011, Selvi et al., 2011). These may partly be consequences of eveningness in modern life. For example, eveningness is associated with insufficient sleep (Taillard et al., 1999), which in turn may lead to a chronic bad affective state (Akashiba et al., 2002). In addition, insufficient sleep and the fact that tests and classes are held earlier in the day at school may underlie the low academic performance (Díaz-Morales and Escribano, 2013), which in turn may lead to a bad affective state. These emotional problems in eveningness may underlie their low pro-sociality, which is described above, because well-being and pro-sociality have a close positive relationship (Strayer and Roberts, 2004, Takeuchi et al., 2014a). Finally, perhaps because of sleep and emotional problems, eveningness has also been associated with attentional and behavioral problems in everyday life (Baird et al., 2012, Gau et al., 2007, Susman et al., 2007).
Thus, morningness–eveningness is an essential characteristic of individuals. It is related to a wide range of individual characteristics that are important in society, education and clinical areas such as academic performance, aging, sex, and traits and states associated with psychiatric disorders and social cognition. However, despite the unique importance of the morningness–eveningness construct, the anatomical basis of the aspects of morningness–eveningness that are related to a wide range of stable abilities and traits of individuals is unknown.
We hypothesized that increased morningness is associated with the following various brain structures in young adults by considering the wide range of psychological correlates of morningness–eveningness. (A) Less gray matter (GM) structures in the precuneus, medial prefrontal cortex, and adjacent regions, which are structurally associated with pro-social (Banissy et al., 2012, Coutinho et al., 2013, Hu et al., 2011, Takeuchi et al., 2014b) and self-disciplinary cognitive components (Gardini et al., 2009, Takeuchi et al., 2011f) and functionally associated with inference of mind, both of one's own mind and that of others (Ochsner et al., 2004); (B) larger or less GM structures in the anterior brain regions including the medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), lateral prefrontal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex, which are associated with higher-order cognitive functions; (C) less GM structures in areas associated with states or traits linked to negative mood, such as the amygdala/hippocampal areas (Iidaka et al., 2006, Yamasue et al., 2008), insula (Takeuchi et al., 2014b); (D) larger GM structures in some of the abovementioned areas and the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), which are liked to attentional problems in everyday life (Kanai et al., 2011).
To test these hypotheses, we investigated how individual differences in morningness–eveningness were associated with regional GM density (rGMD) using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) (Good et al., 2001) after controlling for age, sex, general intelligence, and total intracranial volume.
As described in our previous study (Takeuchi et al., 2012c), functional imaging and structural studies have advantages and disadvantages, and they can be useful in different situations. Here, structural imaging studies are especially useful for investigating the aspects of morningness–eveningness that are related to a wide range of stable abilities and traits of individuals. This is because unlike the results of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, the results of structural imaging studies are not likely to be affected by the time of day. Furthermore, in MRI correlation studies (including those of fMRI) that investigated the neural basis of individual differences, we are able to use established cognitive measures with proven reliability and validity to tap individual differences in cognition. As summarized in our previous study (Takeuchi et al., 2012b), GM in VBM is thought to reflect the number and size of neurons and glial cells, the synaptic bulk, and the number of neurites (May and Gaser, 2006, Takeuchi et al., 2011e). However, this idea remains to be proven by histological studies. The rGMD has also been associated with specific individual personality (trait) characteristics (e.g., Haier et al., 2004, Kanai et al., 2011, Takeuchi et al., 2010a, Takeuchi et al., 2013c). Structural imaging thus provides unique information about the neural origin of morningness–eveningness. Automated VBM yields data comparable to that of manual region of interest (ROI)-based analyses (Testa et al., 2004). Recent advancement of preprocessing methods, including segmentation using more tissue classes, and diffeomorphic anatomical registration using diffeomorphic anatomical registration through exponentiated lie algebra (DARTEL) methods have further improved the accuracy of results and achieved more precise inter-subject registration of brain images (Klein et al., 2009, Peelle et al., 2012).
Section snippets
Subjects
Seven hundred and seventy-six healthy, right-handed individuals (432 men and 344 women; 20.7 ± 1.8 years) participated in this study. Subjects participated in this study as part of an ongoing project investigating associations among brain imaging, cognitive functions, aging, genetics, and daily habits (Takeuchi et al., 2010b, Takeuchi et al., 2010a, Takeuchi et al., 2011a, Takeuchi et al., 2011b, Takeuchi et al., 2011e, Takeuchi et al., 2012c, Taki et al., 2010, Taki et al., 2011). Data derived
Relationships between MEQ scores (chronotype) and psychometric test scores as assessed by multiple regression
Table 1 shows the average and standard deviation (SD) of age and RAPM and MEQ scores in males and females. Fig. 1 shows the distributions of MEQ scores and category types in males and females. Multiple regression analysis corrected for the effect of age showed that females had significantly higher MEQ scores (or morningness) than males. Greater morningness in females is consistent with many (Adan and Natale, 2002, Randler, 2007) but not all of previous studies (Paine et al., 2006), A recent
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate associations between brain structures and morningness–eveningness. Consistent with some of our hypotheses, we demonstrated that morningness (less eveningness) was associated with (a) lower rGMD in the precuneus and adjacent areas, (b) lower rGMD in the left PPC and adjacent areas, and (c) higher rGMD in the bilateral OFC. Further, our exploratory analyses revealed that (d) higher rGMD in bilateral hypothalamic clusters around
Acknowledgments
We thank Yuki Yamada for operating the MRI scanner, Haruka Nouchi for conducting the psychological tests, all other assistants for helping with the experiments and the study, and the study participants and all our other colleagues at IDAC, Tohoku University for their support. This study was supported by JST/RISTEX, JST/CREST, a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (KAKENHI 23700306), and a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) (KAKENHI 25700012) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
References (104)
- et al.
Relationship between quality of life and mood or depression in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome
Chest J.
(2002) - et al.
Voxel-based morphometry—the methods
NeuroImage
(2000) - et al.
Inter-individual differences in empathy are reflected in human brain structure
NeuroImage
(2012) - et al.
MRI atlas of the human hypothalamus
NeuroImage
(2012) - et al.
Sleep, circadian rhythms, and delayed phase in adolescence
Sleep Med.
(2007) - et al.
Predicting school achievement: the role of inductive reasoning, sleep length and morningness–eveningness
Personal. Individ. Differ.
(2013) - et al.
Mapping IQ and gray matter density in healthy young people
NeuroImage
(2004) - et al.
Individual differences in personality traits reflect structural variance in specific brain regions
Brain Res. Bull.
(2009) - et al.
Morning and evening types and creative thinking
Personal. Individ. Differ.
(2007) - et al.
Time of day, intellectual performance, and behavioral problems in Morning versus Evening type adolescents: Is there a synchrony effect?
Personal. Individ. Differ.
(2007)
Voxel-based morphometry and stereology provide convergent evidence of the importance of medial prefrontal cortex for fluid intelligence in healthy adults
NeuroImage
A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains
NeuroImage
Structural brain variation and general intelligence
NeuroImage
Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods
NeuroImage
Voxel-based morphometry studies of personality: Issue of statistical model specification—effect of nuisance covariates
NeuroImage
Genetic and environmental influence on morningness–eveningness
Personal. Individ. Differ.
Volume of left amygdala subregion predicted temperamental trait of harm avoidance in female young subjects. A voxel-based morphometry study
Brain Res.
A molecular mechanism regulating rhythmic output from the suprachiasmatic circadian clock
Cell
Adaptive and maladaptive components of rumination? Diagnostic specificity and relation to depressive biases
Behav. Ther.
Human parietal cortex structure predicts individual differences in perceptual rivalry
Curr. Biol.
Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration
NeuroImage
The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory
Neuropsychologia
Adjusting for global effects in voxel-based morphometry: gray matter decline in normal aging
NeuroImage
Morningness–eveningness and intelligence among high-achieving US students: Night owls have higher GMAT scores than early morning types in a top-ranked MBA program
Intelligence
Gender differences in morningness–eveningness assessed by self-report questionnaires: A meta-analysis
Personal. Individ. Differ.
Morningness–eveningness, sleep–wake variables and big five personality factors
Personal. Individ. Differ.
Relationship between morningness–eveningness and temperament and character dimensions in adolescents
Personal. Individ. Differ.
Morningness–eveningness and intelligence: early to bed, early to rise will likely make you anything but wise!
Personal. Individ. Differ.
Regional gray matter volume of dopaminergic system associate with creativity: Evidence from voxel-based morphometry
NeuroImage
White matter structures associated with creativity: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging
NeuroImage
Failing to deactivate: the association between brain activity during a working memory task and creativity
NeuroImage
Verbal working memory performance correlates with regional white matter structures in the fronto-parietal regions
Neuropsychologia
Regional gray and white matter volume associated with Stroop interference: evidence from voxel-based morphometry
NeuroImage
A voxel-based morphometry study of gray and white matter correlates of a need for uniqueness
NeuroImage
Effects of working memory-training on functional connectivity and cerebral blood flow during rest
Cortex
Anatomical correlates of self-handicapping tendency
Cortex
PER3 polymorphism predicts sleep structure and waking performance
Curr. Biol.
Gender differences in morningness–eveningness preference
Chronobiol. Int.
Circadian typology and temperament and character personality dimensions
Chronobiol. Int.
Development of Japanese version of the checklist individual strength questionnaire in a working population
J. Occup. Health
Individual differences in the phase and amplitude of the human circadian temperature rhythm: with an emphasis on morningness–eveningness
J. Sleep Res.
Adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder is associated with alterations in circadian rhythms at the behavioural, endocrine and molecular levels
Mol. Psychiatry
The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates
Br. J. Clin. Psychol.
Inattentive symptoms of ADHD are related to evening orientation
J. Atten. Disord.
Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory are dissociated in posterior parietal cortex: neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence
J. Neurosci.
A psychobiological model of temperament and character
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
Brain correlates of pro-social personality traits: a voxel-based morphometry study
Brain Imaging Behav.
Closing the circadian loop: CLOCK-induced transcription of its own inhibitors per and tim
Science
Indecision and avoidant procrastination: The role of morningness—eveningness and time perspective in chronic delay lifestyles
J. Gen. Psychol.
Timing and consolidation of human sleep, wakefulness, and performance by a symphony of oscillators
J. Biol. Rhythm.
Cited by (23)
The subjective amplitude of the diurnal rhythm matters – Chronobiological insights for neuroimaging studies
2023, Behavioural Brain ResearchChronotype, Longitudinal Volumetric Brain Variations Throughout Adolescence, and Depressive Symptom Development
2023, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :We also found that sleep characteristics associated with higher eveningness correlated with GMV in the orbitofrontal cortex and posterior regions, such as the precuneus, supramarginal gyrus, and other regions of the parietal and occipital cortices. Structural abnormalities of these regions were found to be associated with chronotype in 2 previous studies in adults.7,8 In these studies, sleep habits associated with chronotype were not investigated, suggesting that they might explain the structural variations as in our study.
Altered resting-state connectivity within default mode network associated with late chronotype
2018, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchCitation Excerpt :At the group level, linear effects of chronotype on DMN connectivity were tested for significance using non-parametric permutation tests (applying 5000 permutations). As previous work has reported as association between lower regional grey matter density and late chronotype (Takeuchi et al., 2015), grey-matter probability maps were included as a voxel-wise anatomical covariate. Briefly, each individual subject's T1-weighted high-resolution anatomic image was registered to a standard template [Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) 152 stereotactic template] using an affine procedure with a 12-parameter fit (Jenkinson and Smith, 2001).
Development of morning–eveningness in adolescence: implications for brain development and psychopathology
2023, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines