Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 62, Issue 4, 1 October 2012, Pages 2222-2231
NeuroImage

Review
The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.018Get rights and content

Abstract

The Human Connectome Project (HCP) is an ambitious 5-year effort to characterize brain connectivity and function and their variability in healthy adults. This review summarizes the data acquisition plans being implemented by a consortium of HCP investigators who will study a population of 1200 subjects (twins and their non-twin siblings) using multiple imaging modalities along with extensive behavioral and genetic data. The imaging modalities will include diffusion imaging (dMRI), resting-state fMRI (R-fMRI), task-evoked fMRI (T-fMRI), T1- and T2-weighted MRI for structural and myelin mapping, plus combined magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography (MEG/EEG). Given the importance of obtaining the best possible data quality, we discuss the efforts underway during the first two years of the grant (Phase I) to refine and optimize many aspects of HCP data acquisition, including a new 7T scanner, a customized 3T scanner, and improved MR pulse sequences.

Introduction

Recent advances in neuroimaging, including many that are discussed in this special issue, have made it feasible to examine human brain connectivity systematically and across the whole brain in large numbers of individual subjects. Progress in the nascent field of connectomics led NIH in 2009 to announce a Request for Applications for the Human Connectome Project (HCP), with an overarching objective of studying human brain connectivity and its variability in healthy adults. In September, 2010, grants were awarded to two consortia(http://www.neuroscienceblueprint.nih.gov/connectome/). One is a 5-year grant to a consortium of ten institutions in the United States and Europe,led by Washington University and the University of Minnesota (the ‘WU-Minn HCP Consortium’). This consortium aims to study brain connectivity and function with a genetically-informative design in 1200 individuals using four MR-based modalities plus MEG and EEG. Behavioral and genetic data will also be acquired from these subjects. The second is a 3-year grant to a consortium led by Harvard/MGH and UCLA to develop an advanced MR scanner for diffusion imaging.

A deeper understanding of human brain connectivity and its variability will provide valuable insights into what makes us uniquely human and what accounts for the great diversity of behavioral capacities and repertoires in healthy adults. It will provide a critical baseline of knowledge for future studies of brain connectivity during development and aging and in myriad neurodevelopmental, neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. Also, the data acquisition strategies and analysis methods developed under the auspices of the HCP will be freely shared and will benefit many other projects. Increasingboth the commonality and the sensitivity of methods used to characterize human brain connectivity across different studies will enhance our ability to detect subtle links between genetics, human brain connectivity patterns, and behavioral variation.

Despite their great promise, all of the modalities that can be appliedto in vivo human connectomics currently have serious limitations in their sensitivity, accuracy, and resolution (Van Essen and Ugurbil, 2012). Hence, during Phase I of the grant (until the summer of 2012) the WU-Minn HCPconsortium is making a major effort to improve the methods of data acquisition and analysis. This includes a new 3T MRI scanner designed to improve the quality and resolution of connectivity data,as well asanew 7T scanner, both of which will capitalize on major improvement in MR pulse sequences. This initial phase will be followed by a3-year period of data acquisition from the main cohort(Phase II). The combination of methods refinement followed by extensive data acquisition makes the HCP a unique enterprise compared to several other large-scale imaging efforts that are also underway (see Discussion).

This review focuses on the data acquisition aspects of the HCP, given their critical importance for the endeavor. After a brief overview of the HCP objectives, we describe the subject cohort and behavioral measures, followed by the hardware configuration and data acquisition strategies for each of the main imaging modalities. Alreadythere have been significant methodological advances that provide grounds for optimism about the data quality that will be attainable.Approaching near-optimal solutions will be very challenging given the large number of factors and parameters needing evaluation. We provide examples of our general approach to this problem.

Section snippets

Overview of the HCP

Fig. 1 provides a high-level view of our plans for data acquisition in Phase II of the project. Data will be acquired from 1200 subjects, comprising young adult sibships of average size 3–4, including twins and their non-twin siblings. Each subject will spend 2 days at WashU for behavioral assessment, blood draw for eventual genotyping, and multiple MR scanning sessions (4 sessions, with 3 lasting 1 h). The WashU scans will be carried out using a customized 3T ConnectomeScanner adapted from a

Discussion

Three issues touched upon above warrant brief discussion. These include issues of (i) limitations of in vivo imaging; (ii) advantages of twin–sibship families coupled with data sharing limitations; and (iii) the relationship of HCP to other large-scale neuroimaging projects.

Acknowledgments

We thank the entire WU-Minn HCP consortium team for their excellent efforts that have contributed directly or indirectly to the plans described in this manuscript. Funded in part by the Human Connectome Project (1U54MH091657) from the 16 NIH Institutes and Centers that Support the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research, and by the McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University. Members of the WU-Minn HCP Consortium are listed at //www.humanconnectome.org/about/hcp-investigators.html

References (65)

  • L. Marzetti et al.

    Understanding brain connectivity from EEG data by identifying systems composed of interacting sources

    NeuroImage

    (2008)
  • R.R. McCrae et al.

    A contemplated revision of the NEO Five Factor Inventory

    Personal. Individ. Differ.

    (2004)
  • J.C. Mosher et al.

    Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1993)
  • S.M. Nelson et al.

    A parcellation scheme for human left lateral parietal cortex

    Neuron

    (2010)
  • B. Pakkenberg et al.

    Aging and the human neocortex

    Exp. Gerontol.

    (2003)
  • J. Power et al.

    Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion

    Neuroimage

    (2012)
  • M. Siegel et al.

    Neuronal synchronization along the dorsal visual pathway reflects the focus of spatial attention

    Neuron

    (2008)
  • S.J. Smith

    Circuit reconstruction tools today

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (2007)
  • S.M. Smith et al.

    Network modelling methods for FMRI

    NeuroImage

    (2011)
  • D.K. Sodickson et al.

    SMASH imaging

    Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am.

    (1999)
  • Y. Tang et al.

    A stereological method for estimating the total length and size of myelin fibers in human brain white matter

    J. Neurosci. Methods

    (1997)
  • J.D. Tournier et al.

    Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution

    NeuroImage

    (2004)
  • V.J. Wedeen et al.

    Diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging (DSI) tractography of crossing fibers

    NeuroImage

    (2008)
  • T.M. Achenbach et al.

    Assessment of adult psychopathology: meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations

    Psychol. Bull.

    (2005)
  • I. Aganj et al.

    Reconstruction of the orientation distribution function in single- and multiple-shell q-ball imaging within constant solid angle

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2010)
  • H. Akil et al.

    Challenges and opportunities in mining neuroscience data

    Science

    (2011)
  • S. Andersson et al.

    How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • F.A. Azevedo et al.

    Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (2009)
  • K.K. Bucholz et al.

    A new, semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies: a report on the reliability of the SSAGA

    J. Stud. Alcohol

    (1994)
  • E. Bullmore et al.

    Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2009)
  • A.R. Carter et al.

    Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke

    Ann. Neurol.

    (2010)
  • M.C. Chiang et al.

    Genetics of brain fiber architecture and intellectual performance

    J. Neurosci.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (1740)

    • White matter and literacy: A dynamic system in flux

      2024, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text