Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 23, Issue 3, November 2004, Pages 1059-1067
NeuroImage

Hunting for neuronal currents: absence of rapid MRI signal changes during visual-evoked response

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.003Get rights and content

Abstract

While recent reports have advocated the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect the effects of neuronal currents associated with human brain activity, only preliminary experimental data have been presented so far to demonstrate the feasibility of the method. Furthermore, it has not been adequately demonstrated that (1) MRI can separate neuronal current (NC) effects from other effects such as blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) contrast; (2) MRI has adequate sensitivity to detect NCs in vivo. In this work, we introduce a method that can separate slow (e.g., BOLD) processes from potential rapid (e.g., NC) processes and apply this method to investigate whether MRI allows detection of an NC response to a visual stimulus. MRI studies (n = 8) at 3.0 T using a sensitive multichannel detector showed insignificant effects related to NCs (averaged t < 0.05), in the presence of a highly significant BOLD signal (t = 6.15 ± 0.90). In contrast, magnetoencephalography (MEG) experiments performed under similar conditions on the same subjects showed highly significant electrical activity (t = 7.90 ± 2.28). It is concluded that, under the conditions used in this study, the sensitivity of MRI to detect evoked responses through NCs is at least an order of magnitude below that of BOLD-based functional MRI (fMRI) or MEG and too low to be practically useful.

Introduction

Both spatial and temporal resolution of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) are limited by the underlying physiologic processes, including the dilation of the arteriolar vasculature through neurovascular coupling (Zonta et al., 2003), the ensuing flow response (Kwong et al., 1992), and the hemoglobin transit through the capillary bed and macrovasculature (Duyn et al., 1994, Lee et al., 1995, Mandeville and Marota, 1999). The temporal resolution of fMRI and maybe also its spatial resolution could be substantially improved if MRI can be sensitized to detect the changes in electrical activity associated with brain activation. Changes in both microscopic (e.g., neuronal spiking) and macroscopic electrical activity (e.g., local field potentials) occur on time scales well below the BOLD time scale of several seconds and contain potentially important information, complementary to that available through the BOLD-based signals. On the other hand, established techniques that measure electrical brain activity through intracranial electrodes, voltage sensitive dyes (Shoham and Grinvald, 2001), or electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are either invasive or have poor spatial resolution.

Recently, a number of researchers have suggested the use of fMRI to detect changes in neuronal currents (NCs) during human brain activation (Bodurka and Bandettini, 2002, Kamei et al., 1999, Konn et al., 2003, Xiong et al., 2003). One of the claims is that NC-based MRI has the ability to detect visual and sensorimotor activation with a sensitivity similar to that of BOLD fMRI (Xiong et al., 2003). However, as of yet, this claim has not been validated. Furthermore, previously proposed methodology (Xiong et al., 2003) has a relatively poor efficiency at detecting NCs and does not optimally separate NC contrast from BOLD contrast.

The purpose of the current work was to design an fMRI method that is highly sensitive to both the rapid and slow effects associated with NC and BOLD contrast, respectively, while at the same time allowing for excellent separation of the two effects. Furthermore, the new method was used to quantify the relative sensitivities of NC and BOLD contrast in fMRI experiments of the human visual system and to compare these with the sensitivity of MEG.

Section snippets

Experimental design

The fMRI method was designed to measure BOLD effects and potential NC effects simultaneously, separably, and with high sensitivity. MRI contrast to NCs was envisioned to originate from the effects of intracellular dendritic currents on the MRI signal, including signal amplitude (magnitude) reduction due to intravoxel dephasing (Xiong et al., 2003) and possibly signal phase effects (Kamei et al., 1999). To optimally capture these signal changes, single shot gradient echo EPI was performed with

Image quality

The raw EPI–MRI images were somewhat affected by signal dropout due to intravoxel dephasing, as expected under the conditions of long TE (81 ms), high magnetic field (3.0 T) and large voxel size. However, image quality was reasonable in occipital areas, partly because of the manual shim optimization before scanning. In all subjects, the SNR exceeded 30:1 in the visual cortex, and the TSD averaged 2.87% (Table 1). The TSD of the average signal in the activated pixels (TSD–ROI) was 0.49%, which

General remarks

A novel technique was developed that allows separation of fast and slow signals in response to neuronal activation. The technique was combined with a sensitive MRI scan technique to investigate the feasibility to detect evoked electrical activity in the human visual system. In contrast with previous reports (Kamei et al., 1999, Xiong et al., 2003), evoked NCs did not lead to significant rapid signal changes in MRI, while slow (BOLD) signal changes were highly significant. Furthermore, in

Acknowledgments

Jerzy Bodurka, Martijn Jansma, and Alan Koretsky (all at NIH) are acknowledged for helpful and stimulating discussions.

References (26)

  • J.H. Duyn et al.

    Inflow versus deoxyhemoglobin effects in BOLD functional MRI using gradient echoes at 1.5 T

    NMR Biomed.

    (1994)
  • F. Fera et al.

    EPI–BOLD fMRI of human motor cortex at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: sensitivity dependence on echo time and acquisition bandwidth

    J. Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (2004)
  • J.C. Horton et al.

    The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map

    Arch. Ophthalmol.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (68)

    • MRI and fMRI Optimizations and Applications

      2015, Brain Mapping: An Encyclopedic Reference
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text