ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
NeuroImage
Volume 20, Issue 3, November 2003, Pages 1865-1871
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (206 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.020    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Regular article

Automated method for extracting response latencies of subject vocalizations in event-related fMRI experimentssmall star, filled

J. L. Nellesa, H. M. Lugara, R. S. Coalsona, F. M. Miezina, S. E. Petersena and B. L. SchlaggarCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, a

a Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Pediatrics, Radiology, Anatomy and Neurobiology, and Psychology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

Received 14 May 2003; 
revised 21 July 2003; 
accepted 23 July 2003. ;
Available online 8 October 2003.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

For functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of the neural substrates of language, the ability to have subjects performing overt verbal responses while in the scanner environment is important for several reasons. Most directly, overt responses allow the investigator to measure the accuracy and reaction time of the behavior. One problem, however, is that magnetic resonance gradient noise obscures the audio recordings made of voice responses, making it difficult to discern subject responses and to calculate reaction times. ASSERT (Image daptive Image pectral Image ubtraction for Image xtracting Image esponse Image imes), an algorithm for removing MR gradient noise from audio recordings of subject responses, is described here. The signal processing improves intelligibility of the responses and also allows automated extraction of reaction times. The ASSERT-derived response times were comparable to manually measured times with a mean difference of −8.75 ms (standard deviation of DIFFERENCE = 26.2 ms). These results support the use of ASSERT for the purpose of extracting response latencies and scoring overt verbal responses.

Article Outline

• Introduction
• Methods
• Recording apparatus
• Manual calculation of response times
• Signal processing algorithm
• Technique (Fig. 1)
• Four fundamental components of ASSERT (see Appendix for comprehensive flowchart)
• (1) Fourier transformation of the vocalization signal
• (2) Noise sampling and scaling
• (3) Reiteration to reconstruct vocalization signal
• (4) Calculation of a simple response threshold
• Subjects and data collection
• Results
• Discussion
• Conclusions
• Acknowledgements
• Appendix
• References





NeuroImage
Volume 20, Issue 3, November 2003, Pages 1865-1871
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.