Neural networks letterNovel stability of cellular neural networks with interval time-varying delay☆
Introduction
Cellular neural networks (CNNs), which were introduced in Chua and Yang, 1988a, Chua and Yang, 1988b, have drawn increasing interest over the past few decades owing to their broad applications in a variety of areas, such as signal processing, pattern recognition, associative memory, and combinational optimization. Since time delay is frequently encountered and often causes instability and oscillations (Shi, Boukas, & Agarwal, 1999), the stability of neural networks (NNs) with time delay has received much attention in recent years. Various sufficient criteria for NNs stability have been proposed, either delay-independent or delay-dependent (Arik, 2002, Lu et al., 2003, Wang et al., 2006). Since delay-independent criteria are conservative, especially when the size of delay is small, much attention has been paid to the latter ones. Based on different assumptions and different approaches, a great number of stability criteria for delayed NNs have been proposed (see Chen and Rong (2004), Ensari and Arik (2005a), Wang, Ho, and Liu (2005) and Zhang, Shi, and Qiu (2001) and the references therein). Among them, many results have been concerned with constant delay. For example, in Gao, Lam, and Chen (2006), Singh (2004), Xu, Lam, Ho, and Zou (2004) and Zeng and Wang (2006), the authors have considered the CNNs with discrete and distributed constant delays, and obtained several sufficient conditions to ensure the existence and globally asymptotic stability of the equilibrium point for neural networks. In Wang, Liu, and Liu (2005), Xu et al., 2005a, Xu et al., 2005b, the globally exponential and robust stability problem has been investigated for CNNs with constant delays. Very recently, in He, Wu, and She (2006) and Zeng and Wang (2006), the authors have derived some criteria for CNNs with time-varying delays by the Lyapunov–Krasovskii approach.
Most of the existing results related to time-varying delay systems are based on the assumption (Ensari and Arik, 2005b, He et al., 2006, Mou et al., 2008, Xu et al., 2005a, Xu et al., 2005b, Zeng and Wang, 2006). However, in many practical systems, the typical delay may exist in an interval (), that is, the range of delay varies in an interval for which the lower bound is not restricted to 0. Typical examples of systems with interval time-varying delay are networked control systems (Gao et al., 2008, Yue et al., 2004). The aforementioned stability criteria for NNs with the assumption , when applied to such cases, may be inevitably conservative due to their ignorance of the lower delay bound . Therefore, it is of great significance to investigate the stability of systems with interval time-varying delay, which has driven the initial study on CNNs with interval time-varying delay (He, Liu, Rees, & Wu, 2007).
He et al. (2007) initiated the study on CNNs with interval time-varying delay, and presented some elegant stability conditions. In order to overcome the conservativeness, they paid careful attention to the time derivative calculation of the Lyapunov–Krasovskii functional (LKF), combined with the free-weighting matrix approach, which proves to be very effective. However, it is our observation that the results presented in He et al. (2007) could be further significantly improved if we employ the idea of delay partitioning (Mou et al., 2008), which motivates the present study. More specifically, we represent the time delay as two parts: constant part and time-varying part , that is, Then we introduce a novel Lyapunov–Krasovskii functional by applying the idea of delay partitioning to the constant part . By utilizing the most updated techniques for achieving delay dependence, a new condition is proposed for the asymptotic stability of CNNs with time-varying delays, in the form of linear matrix inequality (LMI). Two examples are given to demonstrate the effectiveness and less conservatism of the proposed results over the existing ones in the literature.
The notation used throughout the paper is fairly standard. denotes the -dimensional Euclidean space and the notation () means that is real symmetric and positive definite (semi-definite). and 0 denote the identity matrix and zero matrix with compatible dimensions. In symmetric block matrices or complex matrix expressions, we use an asterisk to represent a term that is induced by symmetry. stands for a block-diagonal matrix, and is defined as . Matrices are assumed to be compatible for algebraic operations if their dimensions are not explicitly stated.
Section snippets
Problem formulation
Consider the following delayed cellular neural networks: where is the neuron state vector; represents the neuron activation function; is a constant input vector; is a diagonal matrix with , , and are the connection weight matrix and the delayed weight matrix, respectively. The time delay is a time-varying differentiable function that
Main result
In this section, we present our new interval delay-dependent stability condition for the delayed CNNs described in (6).
In the paper, the delay that we consider exists in an interval (), that is, the range of delay varies in an interval for which the lower bound is not restricted to 0. Our crucial idea to solve this problem is to represent the time delay as two parts: constant part and time-varying part , Then, by applying the idea of delay
Examples
In this section, we use two examples to illustrate the advantages of our method.
Example 1 Consider the following interval time-varying delayed CNN, Our purpose is to estimate the allowable upper bounds delay forHe et al., 2007
Conclusion
This paper has investigated the stability problem for CNNs with interval time-varying delay. We have introduced the idea of delay partitioning for constructing a novel Lyapunov–Krasovskii functional, and then obtained some stability criteria with significantly reduced conservatism. The proposed stability criteria benefit from the partition of the lower delay bound and the careful treatment of the derivative of Lyapunov functional with the idea of convex combination. The numerical examples have
References (26)
- et al.
A new delay system approach to network-based control
Automatica
(2008) - et al.
New criteria for synchronization stability of general complex dynamical networks with coupling delays
Physics Letters A
(2006) - et al.
On global asymptotic stability of neural networks with discrete and distributed delays
Physics Letters A
(2005) - et al.
Global robust exponential stability analysis for interval recurrent neural networks
Physics Letters A
(2004) - et al.
Global stability of stochastic high-order neural networks with discrete and distributed delays
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
(2008) - et al.
Robust stability for stochastic Hopfield neural networks with time delays
Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications
(2006) - et al.
Exponential stability of delayed recurrent neural networks with Markovian jumping parameters
Physics Letters A
(2006) An analysis of global asymptotic stability of delayed cellular neural networks
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
(2002)- et al.
Robust global exponential stability of Cohen-Grossberg neural networks with time delays
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
(2004) - et al.
Cellular neural networks: Applications
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems
(1988)
Cellular neural networks: Theory
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems
Global stability analysis of neural networks with multiple time varying delays
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Global stability of a class of neural networks with time-varying delay
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems (II)
Cited by (105)
New delay-dependent conditions for finite-time extended dissipativity based non-fragile feedback control for neural networks with mixed interval time-varying delays
2022, Mathematics and Computers in SimulationDistributed preview control for large-scale systems with time-varying delay
2021, ISA TransactionsCitation Excerpt :Thus, the field of delay systems has attracted scholars for its theory and applications [7–9]. The papers discuss delay control of nonlinear delayed systems [10], differential system [11,12], and large-scale systems [13,14]. Motivated by these other efforts, the problem of distributed preview control for large-scale systems with time-varying delay and polytopic uncertainties will be investigated when the reference signal are previewed.
Stability analysis of interval time-varying delayed neural networks including neutral time-delay and leakage delay
2018, Chaos, Solitons and FractalsStability analysis of delayed neural networks via a new integral inequality
2017, Neural Networks
- ☆
This work was partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (60504008, 60825303), by the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20070213084), by the Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (111064), and by a research grant from the Australian Research Council.
- 1
Tel.: +86 451 86402350 3011.
- 2
Tel.: +61 2 47360608; fax: +61 2 4736 0867.