ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Neurocomputing
Volume 69, Issues 10-12, June 2006, Pages 1175-1178
Computational Neuroscience: Trends in Research 2006
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (168 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.069    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Reward-biased probabilistic decision-making: Mean-field predictions and spiking simulations

Daniel Martía, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Gustavo Decoa, b, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Paolo Del Giudicec, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Maurizio Mattiac, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aComputational Neuroscience Unit, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Pg. Circumval-lació 8, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain bInstitució Catalana d’Estudis Avançats (ICREA) cComplex Systems Unit, Department of Technologies and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, V.le Regina Elena 299, 00161 Roma, Italy

Available online 3 February 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

In this work we study the basic competitive and cooperative mechanisms of neural activity in the context of a two-alternative free-choice eye-movement task, as a function of the expectation of reward. We use a simplified version of the protocol followed by Platt and Glimcher [Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex, Nature 400 (1999) 233–238], in which each choice is associated with independent underlying reward schedules, and explicitly model it using a biophysically realistic network of integrate-and-fire neurons that forms a categorical choice from the expected gain contingencies, via a simple bias mechanism. The model accounts for several experimental findings, such as the gain-modulated firing activity observed by Platt and Glimcher and the matching law.

Keywords: Computational neuroscience; Decision-making; Network model; Lateral intraparietal area

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Behavioral task
3. Computational model
3.1. Mean-field parameter exploration
3.2. Spiking dynamics
References
Vitae




Neurocomputing
Volume 69, Issues 10-12, June 2006, Pages 1175-1178
Computational Neuroscience: Trends in Research 2006
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.