Well-posedness of generalized mixed variational inequalities, inclusion problems and fixed-point problems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.11.015Get rights and content

Abstract

We introduced and studied the concept of well-posedness to a generalized mixed variational inequality. Some characterizations are given. Under suitable conditions, we prove that the well-posedness of the generalized mixed variational inequality is equivalent to the well-posedness of the corresponding inclusion problem. We also discuss the relations between the well-posedness of the generalized mixed variational inequality and the well-posedness of the corresponding fixed-point problem. Finally, we derive some conditions under which the generalized mixed variational inequality is well-posed.

Introduction

In 1966, Tykhonov [26] first gave the Tykhonov well-posedness of a minimization problem, which means the existence and uniqueness of minimizers, and the convergence of every minimizing sequence to the unique minimizer. In many practical situations, there are more than one minimizer for a minimization problem. In a natural way, the concept of Tykhonov well-posedness in the generalized sense was introduced, which means the existence of minimizers and the convergence of some subsequence of every minimizing sequence to a minimizer. There is no doubt that the concept of well-posedness is motivated by the numerical methods producing optimizing sequences. Because the concept of well-posedness is an important and powerful tool in the study of optimization problems, various concepts of well-posedness have been introduced and studied widely for minimization problems in past decades. A great deal of effort has gone into those concepts; see, e.g., [1], [6], [10], [18], [24], [26], [29], [30] and the references therein.

In recent years, the concept of well-posedness has been extended to other contexts: variational inequality problems [5], [8], [15], [16], [17], [18], saddle point problems [4], Nash equilibrium problems [17], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [25], inclusion problems [13], [14], and fixed-point problems [13], [14], [27], [34]. Concerning the well-posedness of a given variational problem, it is interesting and important to establish its metric characterization, to find conditions under which the problem is well-posed, to investigate its links with the well-posedness of other related problems. Some metric characterizations of various well-posedness were established for minimization problems [6], variational inequalities [5], [8], [15], [16] and Nash equilibrium problems [22]. For the well-posedness conditions of various variational problems, we refer the reader to [5], [6], [8], [15], [16], [23], [25]. The relations between the well-posedness of variational inequalities and the well-posedness of minimization problems were discussed in [5], [16], [18]. Lemaire [13] discussed the relations among the well-posedness of minimization problems, inclusion problems and fixed-point problems. Recently, Lemaire et al. [14] further extended the results in [13] by considering perturbations.

Very recently, Fang, Huang and Yao [31] considered and studied the well-posedness of a mixed variational inequality which includes as a special case the classical variational inequality, and derived some results for the well-posedness of this mixed variational inequality, the corresponding inclusion problem and the corresponding fixed-point problem.

Inspired by Fang, Huang and Yao [31], we extend the concept of well-posedness to a generalized mixed variational inequality which includes as a special case the mixed variational inequality, and give some characterizations of its well-posedness. Under suitable conditions, we prove that the well-posedness of the generalized mixed variational inequality is equivalent to the well-posedness of the corresponding inclusion problem. We also discuss the relations between the well-posedness of the generalized mixed variational inequality and the well-posedness of the corresponding fixed-point problem. Finally, we derive some conditions under which the generalized mixed variational inequality is well-posed.

Section snippets

Preliminaries

Let H be a real Hilbert space with norm and inner product ,. For convenience, we denote strong (resp. weak) convergence by (resp. ). Let F:H2H be a nonempty-valued multifunction, A:HH be a single-valued mapping and φ:HR{+} be a proper, convex and lower semicontinuous functional. Denote by domφ the domain of φ, i.e., domφ={xH:φ(x)<+}. Consider the following generalized mixed variational inequality associated with (F,A,φ): GMVI(F,A,φ):findxHsuch that for someuF(x),Au,xy+φ(x)

Well-posedness and metric characterization

In this section we introduce some concepts of well-posedness of the generalized mixed variational inequality and establish their metric characterizations. Let α0 be a given number and let H,A,F and φ be defined as in the previous section.

Definition 3.1

A sequence {xn}H is said to be an α-approximating sequence for GMVI(F,A,φ) if there exist a sequence {un}H with unF(xn)(n1) and a sequence {ϵn} of nonnegative numbers with ϵn0 such that xndomφ,Aun,xny+φ(xn)φ(y)α2xny2+ϵn,yH,n1. If α1>α20,

Links with well-posedness of inclusion problems

In this section we shall investigate the relations between the well-posedness of generalized mixed variational inequalities and the well-posedness of corresponding inclusion problems. In what follows we always denote by and the strong convergence and weak convergence, respectively. Let M:H2H be a set-valued mapping. The inclusion problem associated with M is defined by IP(M):findxHsuch that0M(x).

Definition 4.1

See [13], [14]

A sequence {xn}H is called an approximating sequence for IP(M) if d(0,M(xn))0, or

Links with well-posedness of fixed-point problems

In this section, we shall investigate the relations between the well-posedness of generalized mixed variational inequalities and the well-posedness of the corresponding fixed-point problems. Let T:H2H be a set-valued mapping. The fixed-point problem associated with T is defined by FP(T):findxHsuch thatxT(x).

We first recall some concepts.

Definition 5.1

See [13], [14]

A sequence {xn}H is called an approximating sequence for FP(T) if there exists a sequence {yn}H with ynT(xn)(n1) such that xnyn0 as n.

Definition 5.2

See [13], [14]

We say that FP

Conditions for well-posedness

In this section, we shall prove that under suitable conditions the well-posedness of the generalized mixed variational inequality is equivalent to the existence and uniqueness of its solutions, and the well-posedness in the generalized sense is equivalent to the existence of its solutions.

Theorem 6.1

Let A:HH be weakly continuous, let F:H2H be a nonempty weakly compact-valued multifunction which is H-hemicontinuous and monotone with respect to A , and let φ:HR{+} be proper, convex and lower

Conclusions

In this paper we introduce some concepts of well-posedness for generalized mixed variational inequalities. In Section 3, we establish some metric characterizations of strong α-well-posedness. In Section 4, we discuss the connections between the strong (weak) well-posedness of generalized mixed variational inequalities and strong (weak) well-posedness of inclusion problems. In Section 5, we further investigate the relationships between the strong (weak) well-posedness of generalized mixed

Acknowledgements

The first author’s research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 10771141) and Leading Academic Discipline Project in Shanghai (No. T0401). The research of the second author was partially supported by a grant from the National Science Council.

References (34)

  • Y.P. Fang et al.

    Parametric well-posedness for variational inequalities defined by bifunctions

    Comput. Math. Appl.

    (2007)
  • L.C. Zeng et al.

    Existence of solutions of generalized vector variational inequalities in reflexive Banach spaces

    J. Global Optim.

    (2006)
  • X.X. Huang

    Extended and strong extended well-posedness of set-valued optimization problems

    Math. Methods Oper. Res.

    (2001)
  • K. Kuratowski
    (1968)
  • Q.H. Ansari et al.

    Iterative schemes for solving mixed variational-like inequalities

    J. Optim. Theory Appl.

    (2001)
  • B. Lemaire

    Well-posedness, conditioning, and regularization of minimization, inclusion, and fixed-point problems

    Plisk. Stud. Math. Bulg.

    (1998)
  • B. Lemaire et al.

    Well-posedness by perturbations of variational problems

    J. Optim. Theory Appl.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Levitin–Polyak well-posedness of variational–hemivariational inequalities

      2022, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Motivated by potential applications in mechanics and engineering which can be found in [15–17], for instance, well-posedness results for many kinds of hemivariational inequalities have been obtained in [18–25], in various functional frameworks. We also mention that well-posedness results have been obtained in [26] for saddle point problems, in [27,28] for equilibrium problems and in [29–31] for inclusion and fixed point problems. Despite the large number of publications dedicated to the well-posedness of various nonlinear problems, to the best of our knowledge there are quite few research works dedicated to the LP well-posedness of hemivariational inequalities.

    • On well-posed isoperimetric-type constrained variational control problems

      2021, Journal of Differential Equations
      Citation Excerpt :

      Following this paper, various kinds of well-posedness associated with variational problems have been introduced, such as: Levitin-Polyak well-posedness [15], extended well-posedness (see, for instance, [8,19,5,6,38,16,11,18]). Also, this method was a mathematical tool for investigating the related problems, such as: fixed point problems [2], variational inequality problems [3,14], hemivariational inequality problems [35], equilibrium problems [7,4], complementary problems [9], Nash equilibrium problems [17], etc. Jayswal and Shalini [12] investigated the well-posedness associated with a class of generalized mixed vector variational-like inequalities and the corresponding optimization problems including this inequality as a constraint.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text