Use of Contrast Media in Neuroimaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2012.08.001Get rights and content

Introduction

The goals and indications of central nervous (CNS) or neuroimaging are multiple and involve detection of pathologies, including making a precise diagnosis and a differential diagnosis, and detection of disease complications that require an immediate intervention and proved to be an essential part of the decision-making process for therapy. In the case of neoplastic disorders, for example, neuroimaging can precisely define the location and accurately delineate the lesion before intervention. In the case of radiation oncology, it should precisely define and demarcate the margins for targeted intervention. Neuroimaging is also mandatory after any therapeutic intervention for monitoring of disease and for detection and monitoring of possible side effects.

In emergency medicine, computed tomography (CT) assumes a critical role for the evaluation of traumatic and nontraumatic evaluations.1 CT scanners are fast and widely available, which makes CT a great choice for assessment of neurologic or neurosurgical emergencies. Usually, a conventional noncontrast brain CT is performed in an emergency to detect, for example, fractures and intracranial bleeding, and also to exclude tumors and subdural/extradural hematomas. Nevertheless, the intrinsic tissue contrast is limited in the CT images. Neuroimaging with CT relies, therefore, deeply on contrast media to improve lesion detection (sensitivity) and characterization (specificity).2 Furthermore, contrast agents can be used for functional assessment of physiologic process: the blood perfusion and for the depiction of the vessel compartment (angiography/venography). In CT angiography, the images are obtained a few seconds after high-flow contrast injection and most of the observed enhancement is intravascular. When CT acquisition is delayed for 10 to 15 minutes after contrast agent injection, most of the observed enhancement is interstitial. When CT imaging is done at intermediate times, the enhancement reflects a combination of both intravascular and interstitial components.

Because of its high tissue contrast and noninvasiveness, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is accepted as the most sensitive method for diagnosing diseases of the CNS.3, 4 MR imaging enables accurate recognition and determination of the dimensions of CNS pathologies and their surrounding tissue. This requires a high CNS-to-lesion contrast, which both depends on the signal intensity of the lesion relative to that of the surrounding normal tissue and the best description of the physiologic tissue and vasculature not affected. Furthermore, detailed information on the internal morphology of the lesion is essential for differential diagnosis, grading, and for the selection and planning of therapy.

Although MR imaging using standard nonenhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences has proven to be very sensitive in the detection of pathologic lesions, for most CNS diseases and for many of the currently available functional MR imaging methods, the use of MR contrast media is mandatory. The standard dose used for MR imaging of the CNS is 0.1 mmol/kg body weight, although numerous studies have shown that lesion detection may be improved with the use of higher doses and dedicated sequences.5, 6 A higher dosage also allows for the combination of a number of advanced, mostly contrast-enhanced MR imaging techniques that have been developed that provide new insights into the pathophysiology of CNS diseases, as well as to better describe the angioarchitecture using contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA). One of these techniques, perfusion MR imaging, is now recognized as an important new means for assessing tumor grading and follow-up of various treatment strategies or to better assess cerebrovascular diseases. Another of these techniques, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, is also gaining acceptance for the same purposes. In this article, the reader is provided with the fundamental features of the contrast mechanisms in MR imaging neuroimaging, the basic methodologies and the first clinical experience with the contrast-enhanced functional imaging tools, and some of the classical indications for contrast media. The different properties of the currently available contrast media and the dosage and field dependencies have been discussed in the article by Dr. Kanal, elsewhere in this issue.

In neuroimaging, pathologic enhancement can occur in several regions:

  • 1.

    Abnormal enhancement within vessels without breakdown of the blood-brain-barrier (BBB), which reflects neovascularity, macrovasodilatation or microvasodilatation (aneurysm), and shortened transit time or shunting, including arteriovenous malformations (Fig. 1).

  • 2.

    Extra-axial lesions with no BBB, such as meningioma, acoustic schwannoma, or granulomatous disease.

  • 3.

    Breakdown of BBB with leakage of contrast, including neoplastic disease, infection, infarction, inflammation with demyelinating disease, and trauma.

Section snippets

Mechanism of Contrast Enhancement in CNS

Owing to the presence of the BBB, the currently available contrast media do not leak into the brain tissue.7, 8 Only vascular structures and areas of the brain that have no BBB (choroid plexus, pineal and anterior lobe of pituitary gland) physiologically enhance after contrast injection. The BBB consists of a complex of capillary endothelial cells, pericytes, and astroglial and perivascular macrophages and serves as an effective physical barrier to the entry of lipophobic substances into the

CT and MR perfusion in stroke

The acquisition procedure consists of rapid, repetitive, or continuous scanning through a defined volume of interest immediately before and during the injection of a bolus of contrast agent. In CT, the changes in attenuation, expressed in Hounsfield units, are measured during the contrast injection and reflect the changes in contrast agent concentration. Even with large multidetector CT, perfusion CT does not allow for whole-brain perfusion assessment. But a modern CT scanner with 64-row or

Perfusion in brain tumor

Perfusion imaging in brain tumors has benefits for 3 major fields: differential diagnosis, biopsy planning, and treatment monitoring. Together with other imaging methods, such as DWI and spectroscopic, perfusion imaging has the ability to provide quantitative cellular, hemodynamic, and metabolic information about brain tumor biology.

Brain tumors are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with a correspondingly wide variation in histology and a variety of imaging features. Accurate diagnosis and

DCE MR perfusion

DCE magnetic resonance perfusion (DCE-MRP) is the acquisition of serial images before, during and after the administration of extracellular low-molecular weighted MR contrast media. The resulting signal intensity measurements of the tumor reflect a composite of tumor perfusion, vessel permeability, and the extravascular-extracellular space.65, 66

DCE-MR imaging has been investigated for a range of clinical oncologic applications, including cancer detection, diagnosis, staging, and assessment of

Contrast media dosage

As described, the use of gadolinium (Gd) contrast media is standard for the assessment of different CNS diseases. Whereas in the beginning of MR imaging only one contrast medium (Gd-DTPA, Magnevist, Bayer Healthcare, Wayne, NJ) was available, there are several Gd-based contrast agents available today and use up to a dosage of 0.3 mmol/kg of body weight.

This topic is ongoing in MR imaging and will be continuing with further improvement of the hardware technology and changes in sequence design

MR contrast agents used at different field strength

Over the past decade, most clinical experience in the field of cerebral MR imaging has been with 1.5-T systems with a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight of the conventional Gd chelates, as this combination seems to be an acceptable compromise between imaging expense and diagnostic sensitivity.79, 80 The number of 3.0-T systems in clinical settings has been increasing over the past few years, and systems operating at even higher field strengths are being used in clinical trials already.81

One of the

Summary

Since their introduction, Gd-based contrast media are routinely used in most CNS MR imaging indications, including assessment of CNS tumors, vascular pathologies, infections, degenerative diseases, and posttreatment imaging. Contrast media are applied to improve the sensitivity and specificity of CNS diseases and to allow a better treatment decision, planning, and follow-up.

The standard dose used is 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight with some exceptions that allow injection of up to a triple dose.

More

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (91)

  • F.L. Giesel et al.

    Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a feasibility study of noninvasive assessment, therapeutic follow-up, and possible predictor of improved outcome

    Chest

    (2006)
  • H. Hawighorst et al.

    Magnetically labeled water perfusion imaging of the uterine arteries and of normal and malignant cervical tissue: initial experiences

    Magn Reson Imaging

    (1998)
  • J.G. Smirniotopoulos et al.

    Patterns of contrast enhancement in the brain and meninges

    Radiographics

    (2007)
  • M. Brant-Zawadzki et al.

    Magnetic resonance of the brain: the optimal screening technique

    Radiology

    (1984)
  • L.R. Muroff et al.

    The use of MR contrast in neoplastic disease of the brain

    Top Magn Reson Imaging

    (1995)
  • B.J. Erickson et al.

    Triple-dose contrast/magnetization transfer suppressed imaging of ‘non-enhancing’ brain gliomas

    J Neurooncol

    (2002)
  • G. Schneider et al.

    Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial metastases: effect of dose on lesion detection and delineation

    J Magn Reson Imaging

    (2001)
  • E.A. Neuwelt

    Mechanisms of disease: the blood-brain barrier

    Neurosurgery

    (2004)
  • J. Rautioa et al.

    Drug delivery systems for brain tumor therapy

    Curr Pharm Des

    (2004)
  • R.A. Kroll et al.

    Outwitting the blood-brain barrier for therapeutic purposes: osmotic opening and other means

    Neurosurgery

    (1998)
  • M.R. Sage et al.

    Contrast media and the brain: the basis of CT and MR imaging enhancement

    Neuroimaging Clin N Am

    (1998)
  • C.C. Meltzer et al.

    MR imaging of the meninges. I. Normal anatomic features and nonneoplastic disease

    Radiology

    (1996)
  • J.W. Burke et al.

    Meninges: benign postoperative enhancement on MR images

    Radiology

    (1990)
  • M. Paldino et al.

    Intracranial hypotension syndrome: a comprehensive review

    Neurosurg Focus

    (2003)
  • M.P. Buetow et al.

    Typical, atypical, and misleading features in meningioma

    Radiographics

    (1991)
  • S. Gupta et al.

    Problems with the dural tail sign

    Neuroradiology

    (1993)
  • T. Nagele et al.

    The dural tail adjacent to meningiomas studied by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a comparison with histopathology

    Neuroradiology

    (1994)
  • N.M. Van Sorge et al.

    Defense at the border: the blood-brain barrier versus bacterial foreigners

    Future Microbiol

    (2012)
  • G. Kido et al.

    Acute effects of human recombinant tumor necrosis factor-alpha on the cerebral vasculature of the rat in both normal brain and in an experimental glioma model

    J Neurooncol

    (1991)
  • S.W. Schneider et al.

    Glioblastoma cells release factors that disrupt blood-brain barrier features

    Acta Neuropathol

    (2004)
  • F. Earnest et al.

    Cerebral astrocytomas: histopathologic correlation of MR and CT contrast enhancement with stereotactic biopsy

    Radiology

    (1988)
  • D.R. Groothuis

    The blood-brain and blood-tumor barriers: a review of strategies for increasing drug delivery

    Neuro Oncol

    (2000)
  • A.I. Holodny et al.

    Correlation between the degree of contrast enhancement and the volume of peritumoral edema in meningiomas and malignant gliomas

    Neuroradiology

    (1999)
  • I.N. Pronin et al.

    MRI of high-grade glial tumors: correlation between the degree of contrast enhancement and the volume of surrounding edema

    Neuroradiology

    (1997)
  • V.M. Runge

    A review of contrast media research in 1999–2000

    Invest Radiol

    (2001)
  • I.D. Wilkinson et al.

    Dexamethasone and enhancing solitary cerebral mass lesions: alterations in perfusion and blood-tumor barrier kinetics shown by magnetic resonance imaging

    Neurosurgery

    (2006)
  • J.W. Burke et al.

    Contrast-enhanced magnetization transfer saturation imaging improves MR detection of herpes simplex encephalitis

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (1996)
  • J.M. Davis et al.

    Computed tomography of herpes simplex encephalitis, with clinicopathological correlation

    Radiology

    (1978)
  • R.D. Zimmerman et al.

    CT in the early diagnosis of herpes simplex encephalitis

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (1980)
  • D.R. Enzmann et al.

    Computed tomography of herpes simplex encephalitis

    Radiology

    (1978)
  • M. Brant-Zawadzki et al.

    NMR imaging of experimental brain abscess: comparison with CT

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (1983)
  • R.H. Britt et al.

    Experimental anaerobic brain abscess

    J Neurosurg

    (1984)
  • J.C. Masdeu et al.

    The open ring: a new imaging sign in demyelinating disease

    J Neuroimaging

    (1996)
  • J.C. Masdeu et al.

    Open-ring imaging sign: highly specific for atypical brain demyelination

    Neurology

    (2000)
  • J.C. Bot et al.

    Differentiation of multiple sclerosis from other inflammatory disorders and cerebrovascular disease: value of spinal MR imaging

    Radiology

    (2002)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Magnetic resonance contrast agents for neuroradiology

      2022, Handbook of Neuro-Oncology Neuroimaging
    • Issues in Response Assessment of Brain Tumor Chemotherapy

      2018, Handbook of Brain Tumor Chemotherapy, Molecular Therapeutics, and Immunotherapy: Second Edition
    • Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agents for Neuroradiology: Current Status

      2016, Handbook of Neuro-Oncology Neuroimaging: Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Disclosures: M.E.: Consultant Bayer Healthcare, Speaker for Bayer Healthcare and Bracco; J.D.: None; J.E.G.: Speaker Bureau Bayer Healthcare.

    View full text