ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Microprocessors and Microsystems
Volume 31, Issue 3, 1 May 2007, Pages 168-177
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (316 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.micpro.2006.08.003    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Clustered indexing for branch predictors

Veerle DesmetCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Hans Vandierendoncka, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Koen De Bosscherea, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aGhent University – UGent, Department of Electronics and Information Systems (ELIS), Parallel Information Systems (PARIS) Group, Member HiPEAC, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium

Available online 8 September 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

As a result of resource limitations, state in branch predictors is frequently shared between uncorrelated branches. This interference can significantly limit prediction accuracy. In current predictor designs, the branches sharing prediction information are determined by their branch addresses and thus branch groups are arbitrarily chosen during compilation. This feasibility study explores a more analytic and systematic approach to classify branches into clusters with similar behavioral characteristics. We present several ways to incorporate this cluster information as an additional information source in branch predictors.

Our profile-based results demonstrate that cluster information is useful in various branch prediction schemes. When clustered indexing is applied, the same performance can be obtained with 2–8 times less hardware budget. For small predictor budgets, clustered indexing is very cost-effective, e.g., the misprediction rate in an 8 Kib gshare is reduced 12.3% on average for SPEC CPU2000 INT. For large budgets up to 4 Mib, clustered indexing reduces the number of mispredictions by 3–5%, or stated otherwise only half the hardware budget is required to obtain the same performance as the original gshare scheme.

Keywords: Branch prediction; Aliasing; Clustering

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Clustered indexing
3. Identifying static branch clusters
4. Methodology
5. Evaluation
5.1. Gshare
5.1.1. Why clustered indexing works
5.1.2. Hashing as alternative to subtables
5.2. Other prediction schemes
5.3. Alternative cluster assignments
5.4. IPC
6. Related work
7. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References










 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.