Elsevier

Materials Letters

Volume 59, Issue 18, August 2005, Pages 2292-2295
Materials Letters

Effect of the surfactant coverage on the preparation of polystyrene–clay nanocomposites prepared by melt intercalation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.03.006Get rights and content

Abstract

The melt intercalation of polystyrene (PS) into organoclay with variation in the degree of surfactant coverage by melt intercalation was investigated. The surface coverage of the organoclay was found to play a major role in controlling the type of the final composites formation. Two major types of composites were found depending upon the surface treatment of the organoclay. These are conventional composites and intercalated nanocomposites. At the high degree of the clay's surface coverage, the conventional composite was obtained. It is characterized by the micron size aggregate of the organoclay particle. An intercalated nanocomposite was observed in the organoclay with a lower surface coverage. The organoclay is dispersed into a smaller stack along with the intercalation of polystyrene into the organoclay interlayer. This is originated from the affinity between the organoclay surface and a molten polystyrene.

Introduction

Polymer–clay nanocomposites have emerged as one of the most attractive engineering materials due to their unique properties. The basic properties of the nanocomposites such as mechanical and thermal are improved over a pristine polymer [1], [2], [3], [4]. The properties of polymer–clay nanocomposites are depending upon the formation of composite as reported by Kojima in 1993, the strength of nylon-6 clay composite is increased more than 50% and the heat distortion temperature improved from 65 to 145 °C [1], [2], [5], [6]. The formation of polymer–clay nanocomposites has been classified into three major types depending upon the dispersion of the clay in the polymer matrix. The first type is a conventional composite where the clay layers form an aggregate as a microparticle or tactoid. Second is the intercalated nanocomposite. The interlayer spacing of the clay layer is expanded by polymer insertion while the order of the clay layer is still maintained. The last one is exfoliated nanocomposites where the clay layer is delaminated as an individual layer and distributed randomly in the polymer matrix [7], [8], [9]. The goal of this study is to investigate the effect of the clay surface modification on its dispersion in polystyrene via melt intercalation [7].

Section snippets

Materials

Na-bentonite was obtained from Thai Nippon Chemical Co. Ltd. The surfactant used in this study is a mixture of dioctadecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride salts with alkyl chain lengths of 14 (4%), 16 (32%), and 18 (58%) and often referred as tallow alkyl ammonium. It will be referred as D18 throughout this study. The surfactant was obtained from Thai Specialty Chemical Co., Ltd. Polystyrene (GP 110) was obtained from Thai Petrochemical Industry Public Co., Ltd. Thailand. All the materials were used

Result and discussion

To understand the role of the clay surface coverage on the polystyrene–clay nanocomposites formation, two organoclay with different degrees of surface coverage were synthesized. The controlling of the surface coverage was done by treating the clay with the same surfactant but using a different surfactant loading. The surfactant is a mixed surfactant of the D18 surfactant. The organoclay was prepared by cation exchange reaction. Two loading levels at 0.5 and 2.0 mmol were used. They will be

Conclusion

The effect of clay surface coverage on the preparation of PS–clay nanocomposites by melt intercalation was investigated. Polystyrene shows a good affinity toward the organoclay with a lower surface coverage D1805 where the intercalated nanocomposites was observed. The clay with the high surface coverage hinders the formation of the nanocomposites due to poor wettability of the polystyrene on the clay surface. This leads to a phase separation between the polymer and the organoclay which results

Acknowledgement

Financial support from the Commission on Higher Education (Ministry of Education of Thailand) is gratefully acknowledged.

References (12)

  • M. Alexandre et al.

    Materials Science and Engineering

    (2000)
  • X. Fu et al.

    Polymer

    (2001)
  • P.C. LeBaron et al.

    Applied Clay Science

    (1999)
  • S.Y. Lee et al.

    Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

    (2002)
  • S.S. Ray et al.

    Progress in Polymer Science

    (2003)
  • W. Dongyan et al.

    Chemistry of Materials

    (2002)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (21)

  • Effect of CEC coverage of hexadecyltributylphosphonium modified montmorillonite on polymer compatibility

    2017, Applied Clay Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    According to Morgan and Harris (2003) the excess of surfactant is necessary to allow the PP chains to intercalate between the clay layers. Some contradictory results have also been reported in the literature, where cationic surfactant modified Mt at low loading showed better dispersability than Mt modified with excess surfactant loading (Fornes et al., 2002; Limpanart et al., 2005; Panek et al., 2006). The Mt modified with surfactant below CEC coverage yielded better exfoliation characteristics than Mt modified with excess of surfactant in Nylon 6 matrix (Fornes et al., 2002).

  • Processing and characterization of polystyrene nanocomposites based on Co–Al layered double hydroxide

    2016, Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices
    Citation Excerpt :

    % LDH exhibited improved thermal stability (25 °C) over pristine PMMA. Limpanart et al. [15] followed melt compounding technique to synthesis PS/clay nanocomposites. They observed that two major types of composites namely, conventional and intercalated nanocomposites obtained depending on the modification of the organoclay.

  • Preparation and characterization of soy lecithin-modified bentonites

    2016, Applied Clay Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Clays have been used for the last 30 years as nanometric fillers to reinforce polymeric matrices (Fornes et al., 2001; Hedley et al., 2007) with the aim of improving specific properties, mainly thermal, barrier, impact and mechanical, for an important number of applications (Limpanart et al., 2005; Roelofs and Berben, 2006; Xie et al., 2002).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text