Structure, dielectric and ferroelectric anisotropy of Sr2−xCaxBi4Ti5O18 ceramics

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.11.029Get rights and content

Abstract

Sr2−xCaxBi4Ti5O18(x = 0, 0.05) powders synthesized by solid state route were uniaxially pressed and sintered at 1225 °C for 2 h. The obtained dense ceramics exhibited crystallographic anisotropy with a dominant c axis parallel to the uniaxial pressing direction which was quantified in terms of the Lotgering factor. Microstructure anisotropy of both compositions (x = 0, 0.05) consisted of plate like grains exhibiting their larger surfaces mostly perpendicular to the uniaxial pressing direction. Dielectric and ferroelectric properties of Sr2−xCaxBi4Ti5O18 ceramics were measured under an electric field (E) applied parallel and perpendicularly to uniaxial pressing direction. The obtained dielectric ɛR(T) and polarization (P–E) curves depended strongly on E direction thus denoting a significant effect from microstructure and crystallographic texture. Sr2−xCaxBi4Ti5O18 properties were also significantly affected by Ca content (x): Curie temperature increased from 280 °C (x = 0) to 310 °C (x = 0.05) while ɛR and remnant polarization decreased for x = 0.05. The present results are discussed within the framework of the processing and crystal structure–properties relationships of Aurivillius oxides ceramics.

Research highlights

▶ Sr2−xCaxBi4Ti5O18(x = 0, 0.05) ceramics are partially textured by uniaxial pressing. ▶ c axis appears dominantly parallel to uniaxial pressing direction. ▶ Ferroelectric and dielectric properties are enhanced perpendicularly to c axis. ▶ Ca doping increases TC but lowers ferroelectric and dielectric properties.

Introduction

The wide family of Aurivillius oxides (AO) is described by the general formula (Bi2O2)2+(An−1BnO3n+1)2−, where (An−1BnO3n+1)2− stands for pseudo-perovskite blocks interleaved with bismuth oxide layers (Bi2O2)2+ along the c axis. A stands for a mono-, di- or trivalent ions or a combination of them, B represents a small ion with high valency as Ti4+, Nb5+, Ta5+, etc, or a combination of them, and n denotes the number of these oxides frequently referred as bismuth layer-structured ferroelectrics (BLSF). These materials were repeatedly investigated during the last two decades for modern microelectronic applications, in particular for ferroelectric random access memories (FeRAM) and dynamic random access memories (DRAM) [1], [2], [3], [4]. It is the case of SrBi2M2O9 (M = Ta, Nb) compounds that became renowned due to their excellent fatigue endurance to the repetitive switching of polarization thus explaining their competitive position regarding the until then hegemony of lead-based PZT compositions [5]. Considering that toxicity issues associated to BLSF are of lower concern as compared to PZT [6], the interest for replacing PZT in its innumerous applications either as thin films or bulk ceramics by BLSF offering equivalent or better properties is naturally addressed. BLSF are strongly anisotropic with a spontaneous electrical polarization vector lying almost perpendicular to c axis thus explaining the strong dependence on crystallographic orientation of their dielectric and ferroelectric properties such as dielectric constant, remnant polarization and coercive field [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. As examples SrBi2Ta2O9 (n = 2), Bi4Ti3O12 (n = 3) and SrBi4Ti4O15 (n = 4) ceramics and/or single crystal were effectively reported with different dielectric and ferroelectric properties on a, b plane and along c axis [7], [12], [13]. These and other studies on BLSF have focused the structure, phase transition and ferroelectric properties of low n oxides (n = 2, 3, 4) [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], being n  5 a much less studied case [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. Sr2Bi4Ti5O18 is a BLSF having n = 5 where Bi2O2 layers alternate with (Sr2Bi2Ti5O16) perovskite blocks built by five TiO6 octahedral layers and hosting Sr and Bi at the A site. Being a lead free compound with a relatively high Curie temperature it has been pointed out as a useful ceramic candidate for several piezoelectric applications including piezoelectric resonators, filters and high temperature sensors [21]. For some of these applications Sr2Bi4Ti5O18 ceramics oriented by hot-forging as compared to nonoriented ones showed superior piezoelectric properties futhermore enhanced by Ca doping [21], [24]. Although dielectric and piezoelectric properties of Sr2Bi4Ti5O18 were already measured on ceramics textured by hot-forging [21], ferroelectric properties anisotropy of Sr2Bi4Ti5O18 ceramics, either with or without Ca addition, is still an uncovered issue.

The present study aims at contributing for the search of lead free ferroelectric materials offering competitive properties for electronic functional devices applications. The target compositions include Sr2Bi4Ti5O18 and a Ca doped composition, hereafter referred as Sr2−xCaxBi4Ti5O18, which are synthesized by a solid state route and submitted to a conventional ceramic processing including uniaxial pressing and ordinary firing steps. As previous reports on Ca doped Sr2Bi4Ti5O18 have corroborated the detrimental effects of high Ca contents on the ferroelectric properties of Sr2−xCaxBi4Ti5O18 [24], [25] a low Ca amount was selected for the present study. Moreover, in spite of the variability of the reported effects for small Ca contents on the polarization of the doped ceramics, x = 0.05 was envisaged as a convenient value since it is one of the low Ca dopant levels within the x range (0 < x < 0.20) where a consistent increasing tendency of remanent polarization was found by Quiang et al. [26]. The obtained ceramics were then fully characterized in terms of crystal structure, microstructure, dielectric and ferroelectric properties along two particular directions: (i) a direction parallel to the axis of the uniaxial pressure used for powder consolidation and (ii) a direction perpendicular to that same axis. The correlations between crystallographic orientation, microstructure and ferroelectric properties as well as their variation upon Ca addition are here presented and discussed.

Section snippets

Experimental

Ceramics with Sr2−xCaxBi4Ti5O18 (x = 0, 0.05) composition were prepared by a conventional solid-state reaction process. The appropriate amounts of SrCO3, Bi2O3, TiO2 and CaCO3 powders (Aldrich, 99.9% purity) were thoroughly mixed through ball milling with zirconia balls in ethanol for 24 h. The obtained mixture was dried and then calcined at 1000 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, the calcined powder was milled in the same way as the raw powders, during 24 h. After drying, the powder was passed through a 63 μm

Results and discussion

Fig. 1 presents the XRD pattern corresponding to the powders with the composition Sr2−xCaxBi4Ti5O18, x = 0 (SCBT0), after being calcined at 1000 °C. This XRD pattern is practically coincident with that obtained for the composition Sr2−xCaxBi4Ti5O18, x = 0.05 (SCBT0.05) (XRD not shown). It was observed that the powders are a mixture of SrBi4Ti4O15 and SrTiO3 crystalline phases, regardless the presence of Ca. Fig. 2 shows the XRD patterns of both SCBT0 and SCBT0.05 pellets sintered at 1225 °C, either

Conclusions

Bismuth layer-structured Sr2Bi4Ti5O18 ceramics without second phases were successfully prepared by conventional solid-state reaction route. Using a uniaxial pressing for green powder consolidation allows the ceramic developing a modest texture which is nevertheless sufficient for enabling anisotropic microstructure and electrical properties to be obtained. The dielectric and ferroelectric properties of the obtained ceramics are strongly dependent on the applied field direction. The remnant

Acknowledgement

FCT for the financial support through the project PTDC/CTM/71643/2006

References (34)

  • S.K. Kim et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (1996)
  • R.Z. Hou et al.

    Solid State Commun.

    (2004)
  • B.J. Kennedy et al.

    Solid State Commun.

    (2003)
  • P. Ferrer et al.

    J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.

    (2007)
  • Z. Xu et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2009)
  • F.K. Lotgering et al.

    Nucl. Chem.

    (1959)
  • H. Amorin et al.

    J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.

    (2005)
  • A. Yokoi et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. B

    (2006)
  • B.J. Kennedy et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (2008)
  • E.C. Subbarao

    J. Am. Ceram. Soc.

    (1962)
  • J.F. Scott et al.

    Science

    (1989)
  • H. Ogawa et al.

    Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.

    (2001)
  • E.C. Subbarao

    Int. Ferroelectr

    (1996)
  • C.A. Paz de Araujo et al.

    Nature

    (1995)
  • M.D. Maeder et al.

    J. Electroceram.

    (2004)
  • M.G. Stachiotti et al.

    Phys. Rev. B.

    (2000)
  • Y. Shimakawa et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text