Elsevier

Marine Micropaleontology

Volume 103, September 2013, Pages 40-50
Marine Micropaleontology

Research paper
Global shifts in Noelaerhabdaceae assemblages during the late Oligocene–early Miocene

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2013.07.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We quantified Noelaerhabdaceae assemblages during the late Oligocene–early Miocene.

  • A successive dominance of Cyclicargolithus and reticulofenestrids is highlighted.

  • Similar succession is observed in three sites from the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.

  • This change is linked to global paleoceanographic changes or evolutionary process.

Abstract

This study investigates abundance variations in Noelaerhabdaceae assemblages during the late Oligocene–early Miocene at three subtropical sites in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans (DSDP Sites 516, 608 and 588). At these three sites, nannofossil assemblages were characterized by the successive high proportion of Cyclicargolithus, Dictyococcites and Reticulofenestra. Local paleoceanographic changes, such as the input of nutrient-poor water masses, might explain shifts in ecological prominence within the Noelaerhabdaceae at DSDP Site 516 (South Atlantic). But the similar timing of a decline in Cyclicargolithus at the three studied sites more likely corresponds to a global process. Here, we explore possible causes for this long-term taxonomic turnover. A global change in climate, associated with early Miocene glaciations, could have triggered a decline in fitness of the taxon Cyclicargolithus. The ecological niche made vacant because of the decrease in Cyclicargolithus could then have been exploited by Dictyococcites and Reticulofenestra that became prominent in the assemblages after 20.5 Ma. Alternatively, this global turnover might reflect a gradual evolutionary succession and be the result of other selection pressures, such as increased competition between Cyclicargolithus and Dictyococcites/Reticulofenestra. A diversification within Dictyococcites/Reticulofenestra, indicated by an expansion in the size variation within this group since ~ 20.5 Ma, may have contributed to the decreased fitness of Cyclicargolithus.

Introduction

The coccolithophore family Noelaerhabdaceae is dominant in most Neogene calcareous nannofossil assemblages and include the two most prominent modern coccolithophores and alkenone producers, namely Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica, known to produce extensive blooms in today's oceans. Those large scale blooms have important implications for the global carbon cycle through processes of photosynthesis, calcification and respiration (Rost and Riebesell, 2004). During the Pleistocene, distinct intervals of dominance are recorded within the gephyrocapsids (e.g., Matsuoka and Okada, 1990, Bollmann et al., 1998, Flores and Marino, 2002, Flores et al., 2003, Baumann and Freitag, 2004, Barker et al., 2006) while E. huxleyi rose to global dominance ~ 270 kyr ago (Thierstein et al., 1977). The cosmopolitan distribution of the Noelaerhabdaceae family, which is believed to represent the main lineage of ancient alkenone producers (Marlowe et al., 1990), was sustained throughout most of the Cenozoic. However, our knowledge about the ecological preference or assemblage dynamics of the Oligocene and Miocene representatives of the Noelaerhabdaceae is relatively poor (Haq, 1980; Rio et al., 1990, Young, 1990, Kameo and Sato, 2000).

Several studies have shown that the late Oligocene–early Miocene period is marked by an important turnover of calcareous nannofossils, with first and last occurrences that are of biostratigraphic interest (Pujos, 1985, Olafsson, 1989, Young, 1998). For example, the early definition of the Oligocene–Miocene boundary relied on the last occurrence of Dictyococcites bisectus (Reticulofenestra bisecta of some authors; Berggren et al., 1985). However, only a few studies have estimated absolute abundances of the different genera of Noelaerhabdaceae during this period (e.g., Olafsson, 1989, Henderiks and Pagani, 2007, Plancq et al., 2012) and the paleoecological affinities of most species are still poorly known. The late Oligocene to early Miocene was a period of relative global warmth interrupted by large, transient Antarctic glaciations (named “Oi-2” and “Mi-1” events) as attested by significant oxygen isotopic (δ18O) increases (0.50 to > 1.0‰) in benthic foraminiferal records (e.g., Miller et al., 1991, Miller et al., 1996, Zachos et al., 2001a, Zachos et al., 2001b, Billups et al., 2002). The deepening of the Drake Passage and the subsequent intensification of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) may have been coincident with the Oligocene–Miocene boundary and are believed to constitute important events in the Antarctic ice sheet expansion (e.g., Barker and Thomas, 2004, von der Heydt and Dijkstra, 2006), although the causes of the inception of the glacial history of Antarctica are still being debated (Scher and Martin, 2006, Livermore et al., 2007, Cramer et al., 2009). The paleoceanographic changes associated with these cooling events could have influenced the composition of the nannofossil assemblages, which are largely controlled by variations in the temperature and nutrient characteristics of the upper water column (e.g., McIntyre and Bé, 1967, Okada and Honjo, 1973, Winter and Siesser, 1994).

In the present study, we investigate the relative and absolute abundances of three Noelaerhabdaceae genera – Cyclicargolithus, Reticulofenestra and Dictyococcites – in sediments from three Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) sites covering the late Oligocene–early Miocene. These three sites are located in the North and South Atlantic and South-West Pacific, in areas corresponding to subtropical gyres. Results highlight similar variations in Noelaerhabdaceae assemblages at all studied sites, with an apparent global decline in Cyclicargolithus, a dominant species in Oligocene sediments, at ~ 20.5 million years ago (Ma). This overall turnover cannot be explained by local paleoceanographic changes alone, and suggests the influence of global abiotic and/or biotic selection pressures.

Section snippets

Studied sites and sampling strategy

The investigated time interval spans the latest Oligocene and the early Miocene, including nannofossil zones NP25-NN4 (Martini, 1971) (~ 25–16 Ma; Gradstein et al., 2012). Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) Sites 516, 608 and 588 located in South Atlantic, North Atlantic and South-West Pacific, respectively, (Fig. 1) were selected for their continuous sedimentation and good nannofossil preservation (e.g., Barker et al., 1983, Lohman, 1986, Takayama and Sato, 1987, Plancq et al., 2012).

DSDP Leg 94

Taxonomy used for the Noelaerhabdaceae

The taxonomy used to distinguish the different species within the Noelaerhabdaceae is somewhat arbitrary, since it is primarily based on the coccolith size (Young, 1998). The differentiation at the genus level of the three genera of the Noelaerhabdaceae (Reticulofenestra, Dictyococcites and Cyclicargolithus) is also subject to discussion. Dictyococcites is often considered as a junior synonym of Reticulofenestra and the two genera are grouped either as reticulofenestrids (e.g., Henderiks and

Results

Mean absolute abundances of nannofossils at DSDP Sites 608, 516 and 588 are of the same order of magnitude (4.2 × 109, 5.0 × 109 and 5.4 × 109 nannofossils/g of sediment, respectively), and do not show any significant stratigraphic trend across the late Oligocene–early Miocene (data not shown). Delicate coccoliths that are prone to dissolution, such as Syracosphaera and Pontosphaera, although rare are observed with pristine structures in the samples investigated by light microscopy, indicating a good

Discussion

Similar variations in Noelaerhabdaceae abundances are observed during the late Oligocene–early Miocene in the South and North Atlantic, and in the South-West Pacific (DSDP Sites 516, 608 and 588, respectively). At the three sites, nannofossil assemblages are successively characterized by high abundances of Cyclicargolithus before ~ 20.5 Ma, Dictyococcites between 20.5 and 18 Ma, and Reticulofenestra afterwards (Fig. 4). Within each genus, the number of morphospecies and their relative abundances

Conclusion

Similar relative and absolute abundance variations in Noelaerhabdaceae assemblages are observed during the late Oligocene–early Miocene in subtropical regions of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, with the successive prominence of C. floridanus, D. antarcticus/D. hesslandii, and R. minutula/R. pseudoumbilicus. We explored the paleoenvironmental factors that may have triggered the observed assemblage turnover, in spite of a poor knowledge of the ecological preferences of the Oligocene–Miocene

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jeremy Young, Giuliana Villa and Richard Jordan for their constructive comments and critical review of a previous version of the manuscript. This study used Deep Sea Drilling Project samples provided by the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program. We thank the curators from the Bremen Core Repository and the Kochi Core Center for their efficiency. Yannick Donnadieu (LSCE, France) is kindly acknowledged for stimulating discussions.

References (93)

  • J. Henderiks

    Coccolithophore size rules—reconstructing ancient cell geometry and cellular calcite quota from fossil coccoliths

    Marine Micropaleontology

    (2008)
  • K. Kameo et al.

    Biogeography of Neogene calcareous nannofossils in the Caribbean and the eastern equatorial Pacific—floral response to the emergence of the Isthmus of Panama

    Marine Micropaleontology

    (2000)
  • Y. Lagabrielle et al.

    The tectonic history of Drake Passage and its possible impacts on global climate

    Earth and Planetary Science Letters

    (2009)
  • I.T. Marlowe et al.

    Long-chain alkenones and alkyl alkenoates and the fossil coccolith record of marine sediments

    Chemical Geology

    (1990)
  • H. Matsuoka et al.

    Quantitative analysis of Quaternary nannoplankton in the subtropical northwestern Pacific Ocean

    Marine Micropaleontology

    (1989)
  • A. McIntyre et al.

    Modern coccolithophores of the Atlantic Ocean-I. Placolith and cyrtoliths

    Deep-Sea Research

    (1967)
  • S. Monechi et al.

    Biotic signals from nannoflora across the iridium anomaly in the upper Eocene of the Massignano section: evidence from statistical analysis

    Marine Micropaleontology

    (2000)
  • R.D. Norris et al.

    Evolutionary ecology of Globorotalia (Globoconella) (planktic foraminifera)

    Marine Micropaleontology

    (1994)
  • H. Okada et al.

    Supplementary modification and introduction of code numbers to the low-latitude coccolith biostratigraphic zonation (Bukry, 1973; 1975)

    Marine Micropaleontology

    (1980)
  • H. Pälike et al.

    Orbitally forced palaeoclimatic records from the equatorial Atlantic Ceara Rise

    Quaternary Science Reviews

    (2006)
  • S.F. Pekar et al.

    High-resolution ice-volume estimates for the early Miocene: evidence for a dynamic ice sheet in Antarctica

    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology

    (2006)
  • D. Persico et al.

    Eocene–Oligocene calcareous nannofossils from Maud Rise and Kerguelen Plateau (Antarctica): paleoecological and paleoceanographic implications

    Marine Micropaleontology

    (2004)
  • G. Villa et al.

    Middle Eocene–late Oligocene climate variability: calcareous nannofossil response at Kerguelen Plateau, Site 748

    Marine Micropaleontology

    (2008)
  • W. Wei et al.

    Biogeographic gradients of middle Eocene–Oligocene calcareous nannoplankton in the South Atlantic Ocean

    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology

    (1990)
  • P. Wells et al.

    Response of nannoplankton to major changes in sea-surface temperature and movements of hydrological fronts over Site DSDP 594 (south Chatham Rise, southeastern New Zealand), during the last 130 kyr

    Marine Micropaleontology

    (1997)
  • J. Backman

    Late Miocene-Early Pliocene nannofossil biochronology and biogeography in the Vera Basin, SE Spain

    Stockholm Contributions in Geology

    (1978)
  • J. Backman

    Miocene–Pliocene nannofossils and sedimentation rates in the Hatton–Rockall Basin, NE Atlantic Ocean

    Stockholm Contributions in Geology

    (1980)
  • M. Balck

    New names for some coccolith taxa

    Geological Society of London Proceedings

    (1967)
  • P.F. Barker et al.

    The shipboard scientific party

    Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project

    (1983)
  • L. Beaufort

    Adaptation of the random settling method for quantitative studies of calcareous nannofossils

    Micropaleontology

    (1991)
  • I.M. Belkin et al.

    Southern Ocean fronts from the Greenwich Meridian to Tasmania

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (1996)
  • W.A. Berggren et al.

    Cenozoic geochronology

    Geological Society of America Bulletin

    (1985)
  • K. Billups et al.

    Late Oligocene to early Miocene geochronology and paleoceanography from the subantarctic South Atlantic

    Paleoceanography

    (2002)
  • J. Bollmann et al.

    Global dominance of Gephyrocapsa coccoliths in the late Pleistocene: selective dissolution, evolution, or global environmental change?

    Paleoceanography

    (1998)
  • D. Bukry

    Cenozoic calcareous nannofossils from the Pacific Ocean

    Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History

    (1971)
  • B.S. Cramer et al.

    Ocean overturning since the Late Cretaceous: inferences from a new benthic foraminiferal isotope compilation

    Paleoceanography

    (2009)
  • B.P. Flower et al.

    Middle Miocene ocean–climate transition: high resolution oxygen and carbon isotopic records from DSDP Site 588A, southwest Pacific

    Paleoceanography

    (1993)
  • S. Gartner

    Nannofossil species related to Cyclococcolithus leptoporus (Murray and Blackman)

    University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions

    (1967)
  • S. Gartner

    Two new calcareous nannofossils from the Gulf Coast Eocene

    Micropaleontology

    (1969)
  • M. Geisen et al.

    Calibration of the random settling technique for calculation of absolute abundance of calcareous nannoplankton

    Micropaleontology

    (1999)
  • M. Geisen et al.

    Species level variations in coccolithophores

  • F.M. Gradstein et al.

    The Geologic Time Scale 2012

    (2012)
  • B.U. Haq

    Electron microscope studies on some upper Eocene calcareous nannoplankton from Syria

    Stockholm Contributions in Geology

    (1966)
  • B.U. Haq

    Coccoliths in cores from the Bellinghausen abyssal plain and Antarctic continental rise (DSDP Leg 35)

    Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project

    (1976)
  • B.U. Haq

    Biogeographic history of Miocene calcareous nannoplankton and paleoceanography of the Atlantic Ocean

    Micropaleontology

    (1980)
  • B.U. Haq et al.

    Late Neogene calcareous plankton biochronology of the Rio Grande Rise (South Atlantic Ocean)

    Journal of Paleontology

    (1978)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Alkenones in Pleistocene Upper Bed I (1.803–1.900 Ma) sediments from Paleolake Olduvai, Tanzania

      2022, Organic Geochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      The widespread occurrence of alkenones in contemporary oceanic sediments was well documented by the early 1990′s (e.g., Brassell, 1993; Herbert, 2006) and linked to their association with the extant coccolithophorids Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica (Marlowe et al., 1984a,b; Volkman et al., 1995). Their identification in ancient marine sediments throughout the Cenozoic has been attributed to contributions from Reticulofenestra and related species (Marlowe et al., 1990; Plancq et al., 2012, 2013; Brassell, 2014) that are the presumed ancestors of modern haptophytes, although the earliest alkenone occurrences extend back to the Cretaceous (Farrimond et al., 1986; Brassell et al., 2004). Reports of alkenones from lacustrine settings were initially sparse (e.g., Cranwell, 1985; Volkman et al., 1988; Li et al., 1996; Thiel et al., 1997; Wang and Zheng, 1998; Sheng et al., 1999; Zink et al., 2001), and it is only in this century that records of their presence in lake sediments have expanded massively to confirm the widespread occurrence and distribution of alkenones in lacustrine environments (e.g., Chu et al., 2005; Jaraula et al., 2010; Toney et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2013; Song et al., 2016; Longo et al., 2018), albeit principally in lakes within the northern hemisphere.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text