Typological guidance in the acquisition of V2 Dutch☆
References (50)
- et al.
Aspects of root infinitives
Lingua
(1998) Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage
Lingua
(1998)Decomposing the left periphery: dialectal and cross-linguistic evidence
On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules
- Blom, E., 2003. From Root Infinitive to Finite Sentence. PhD dissertation, Utrecht...
- et al.
The development of finiteness in early Welsh
Journal of Celtic Language Learning
(2001) Grammatical acquisition: inductive bias and co-evolution of language and the language acquisition device
Language
(2000)Preverbal particles in verb-initial languages
- Bury, this volume. Verb-second, particles, and flexible verb-initial...
Reflections on Language
(1975)
Three factors in language design
Linguistic Inquiry
Constraints on parameter setting. A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in erman child language
Language Acquisition
Charting the learning path: cues to parameter setting
Linguistic Inquiry
Verb second movement rules
Wiener Linguistische Gazette
Twee functionele principes voor de regel “Verschuif het werkwoord”
GLOT
Parameter setting and input reduction
Unambiguous triggers
Linguistic Inquiry
A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch
Root infinitives, tense and truncated structures in Dutch
Language Acquisition
Kindersprache
Aphasie und Allgemeine Lautgesätze
First Steps in Wh-movement
Bootstraps at two for lexicon and discourse
The learnability of syntactic categories
Cited by (10)
Verbal cluster order and processing complexity
2017, Language SciencesCitation Excerpt :However, Meyer and Weerman (2016) argue that these 2–1 constructions in young children are instead a result of the base word order of Dutch (Object-Verb, OV). It has been observed that Dutch children produce verb-final utterances from the beginning (Wijnen, 1997), as well as in their first subordinate clauses (Van Kampen, 2010). Therefore, this seems to be a pattern or construction that is acquired early, and children use it before they produce groups of verbs or verb clusters (Wijnen, 1997).
The nature of Old Spanish verb second reconsidered
2015, LinguaCitation Excerpt :The non-specialised nature of the preverbal field is further illustrated clearly in Table 2, where we see that subject-initial matrix clauses make up a mere 35.32% of V2 clauses: These data are especially significant, in light of a wealth of work on acquisition of V2 languages which views [XPNon-Subject [VFin]] as a defining characteristic of the linguistic output of speakers with a V2 grammar and a crucial cue for V2 acquisition (Poeppel and Wexler, 1993:14; Lightfoot, 1995:40, 1999:152; Yang, 2000:113; Westergaard, 2008:72; Anderssen and Westergaard, 2010:2575; Van Kampen, 2010:273).6 The data are worth further scrutiny in light of observations by Sitaridou (2011:164) for Old Spanish and Kaiser (2002:134) and Rinke and Meisel (2009) for Old French that XP-V-S orders are insufficiently attested in the textual record to motivate a V2 analysis.
Semantic dummy verbs in child Dutch
2021, Dummy Auxiliaries in First and Second Language AcquisitionMore than one way out: On the factors influencing the loss of V to C movement
2019, Linguistic Variation
- ☆
The research for this paper was supported by NWO (grant 360-70-290) and the UiL OTS (Utrecht University).