Elsevier

Lingua

Volume 120, Issue 2, February 2010, Pages 264-283
Lingua

Typological guidance in the acquisition of V2 Dutch

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The main issue of the paper will be the identification of the clause-initial finite verbs as Co in Celtic as well as in Germanic. Framing Co as the core point of V1 and V2 types of languages will here be justified by an acquisitional analysis of V<+fin>-to-Co in Dutch. The background of this argument will be Jakobson's (1942) thesis that there is a hierarchy of typological features and that this hierarchy will show up in language acquisition. Some properties of grammar are of course acquired before others, but, more interestingly, the major typological properties of grammar are invariably the first to be acquired. They happen to serve as the acquisitional basis for the more language-specific properties of grammar. Typological properties survive so well in the history of grammar, because they are the system's bootstrap for learnability.

The successive acquisition steps indicate how grammar is built up by input-control in a flexible way. In a first step, Celtic V1 and Germanic V2 share the basic property of a clause-typing head V<+fin> in Co. The acquisition data suggest that finiteness, not tense, must be the trigger for verb movement. The subject obligation, as well as tense and agreement markings come in after verb movement. The subject obligation seems to get underlined, rather than to be derived from uninterpretable phi-features. The last section discusses the growing importance of Spec.C in Dutch and the typological difference this will cause between V1 and V2 languages.

References (50)

  • T. Hoekstra et al.

    Aspects of root infinitives

    Lingua

    (1998)
  • K. Wexler

    Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage

    Lingua

    (1998)
  • J. Bayer

    Decomposing the left periphery: dialectal and cross-linguistic evidence

  • H. den Besten

    On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules

  • Blom, E., 2003. From Root Infinitive to Finite Sentence. PhD dissertation, Utrecht...
  • R.D. Borsley et al.

    The development of finiteness in early Welsh

    Journal of Celtic Language Learning

    (2001)
  • E.J. Briscoe

    Grammatical acquisition: inductive bias and co-evolution of language and the language acquisition device

    Language

    (2000)
  • D. Bury

    Preverbal particles in verb-initial languages

  • Bury, this volume. Verb-second, particles, and flexible verb-initial...
  • N. Chomsky

    Reflections on Language

    (1975)
  • N. Chomsky

    Three factors in language design

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (2005)
  • H. Clahsen

    Constraints on parameter setting. A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in erman child language

    Language Acquisition

    (1991)
  • B.E. Dresher

    Charting the learning path: cues to parameter setting

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (1999)
  • A. Evers

    Verb second movement rules

    Wiener Linguistische Gazette

    (1981)
  • A. Evers

    Twee functionele principes voor de regel “Verschuif het werkwoord”

    GLOT

    (1982)
  • Evers, A., van Kampen, J., 2001. E-language, I-language and the order of parameter setting, Uil OTS Working Papers...
  • A. Evers et al.

    Parameter setting and input reduction

  • J.D. Fodor

    Unambiguous triggers

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (1998)
  • G.J. de Haan

    A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch

  • L. Haegeman

    Root infinitives, tense and truncated structures in Dutch

    Language Acquisition

    (1995)
  • R. Jakobson

    Kindersprache

    Aphasie und Allgemeine Lautgesätze

    (1942)
  • Jouitteau, M., 2005. La Syntaxe Comparée du Breton, Thèse de doctorat Université de...
  • J. van Kampen

    First Steps in Wh-movement

    (1997)
  • J. van Kampen

    Bootstraps at two for lexicon and discourse

  • J. Kampen

    The learnability of syntactic categories

  • Cited by (10)

    • Verbal cluster order and processing complexity

      2017, Language Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, Meyer and Weerman (2016) argue that these 2–1 constructions in young children are instead a result of the base word order of Dutch (Object-Verb, OV). It has been observed that Dutch children produce verb-final utterances from the beginning (Wijnen, 1997), as well as in their first subordinate clauses (Van Kampen, 2010). Therefore, this seems to be a pattern or construction that is acquired early, and children use it before they produce groups of verbs or verb clusters (Wijnen, 1997).

    • The nature of Old Spanish verb second reconsidered

      2015, Lingua
      Citation Excerpt :

      The non-specialised nature of the preverbal field is further illustrated clearly in Table 2, where we see that subject-initial matrix clauses make up a mere 35.32% of V2 clauses: These data are especially significant, in light of a wealth of work on acquisition of V2 languages which views [XPNon-Subject [VFin]] as a defining characteristic of the linguistic output of speakers with a V2 grammar and a crucial cue for V2 acquisition (Poeppel and Wexler, 1993:14; Lightfoot, 1995:40, 1999:152; Yang, 2000:113; Westergaard, 2008:72; Anderssen and Westergaard, 2010:2575; Van Kampen, 2010:273).6 The data are worth further scrutiny in light of observations by Sitaridou (2011:164) for Old Spanish and Kaiser (2002:134) and Rinke and Meisel (2009) for Old French that XP-V-S orders are insufficiently attested in the textual record to motivate a V2 analysis.

    • Semantic dummy verbs in child Dutch

      2021, Dummy Auxiliaries in First and Second Language Acquisition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The research for this paper was supported by NWO (grant 360-70-290) and the UiL OTS (Utrecht University).

    View full text