doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2007.02.008
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
aDepartment of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh, 210 South Bouquet St. RM6508, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
bIndustrial Technology Research Institute, Taiwan
Received 3 November 2006;
revised 23 January 2007;
accepted 8 February 2007.
Available online 12 March 2007.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a methodology to synthesize facial expressions from photographs for devices with limited processing power, network bandwidth and display area, which is referred as “LLL” environment. The facial images are reduced to small-sized face alive icons (FAI). Expressions are decomposed into the expression-unrelated facial features and the expression-related expressional features. As a result, the common features can be identified and reused across expressions using a discrete model constructed from the statistical analysis on training dataset. Semantic synthesis rules are introduced to reveal the inner relations of expressions. Verified by the experimental prototype system and usability study, the approach can produce acceptable facial expression images utilizing much less computing, network and storage resource than the traditional approaches.
Keywords: Facial expression synthesis; Face alive icons; Emoticons; Iconic visual language
Fig. 1. The Student Client of the CVC System: (a) interface on PC and (b) interface on portable device.
Fig. 2. The process diagram of the expression decomposition.
Fig. 3. The process diagram of the icon synthesis.
Fig. 4. The seven basic expressions in JAFFE database.
Fig. 5. The eye area with 18 landmark points.
Fig. 6. The algorithm to merge items in the discrete model S.
Fig. 7. States of the right eye: (a) b1: normal (b) b2: up (c) b3: wide-open (d) b4: down.
Fig. 8. The states of the mouth: (a) b1: normal (b) b2: down-close (c) b3: up-open (d) b4: down-open.
Fig. 9. Results of the facial expression synthesis.
Fig. 10. Size of user expression profile vs. number of supported expressions.
Fig. 11. The Accuracy of the manually labeling.
Table 1.
Two steps of our approach

Table 2.
Average distance D between training data and the standard states

NEU: neutral; HAP: happiness; SAD: sadness; SUR: surprise; ANG: anger; DIS: disgust; FEA: fear.
Table 3.
The synthesis rules
