Simple quasispecies models for the survival-of-the-flattest effect: The role of space
Introduction
The quasispecies theory of molecular evolution, originally developed by Eigen and collaborators (Eigen et al., 1988, Eigen and Schuster, 1979) has become the standard theoretical framework used to model the evolution of RNA viruses (Domingo and Holland, 1997, Domingo, 2002). One of the keystones of theoretical quasispecies, shared by RNA viruses, is that replication fidelity is so low that the number of mutant offspring generated in a population may exceed the number of offspring identical to the parental genotype. This gives rise to highly polymorphic populations in which the frequency of the wildtype and of each mutant genotype not only depends on their replication rates but also on their constant genesis by mutation from genotypes which are close in genotypic space. In a constant environment and in the absence of other external perturbations, this distribution of genotypes is known as the quasispecies (Eigen et al., 1988).
The existence of a population structure in quasispecies strongly affects the way selection acts, because the evolutionary success of individual genomes does not depend anymore on their own replication rate but also on the average growth rate of the quasispecies they belong to. Fast replicating genomes that produce low-fitness offspring can be outcompeted by slow replicating genomes provided the latter inhabits a region of sequence space characterized by high neutrality and connectivity (Schuster and Swetina, 1988, van Nimwegen et al., 1999, Wilke, 2001b). This phenomenon has been dubbed as the quasispecies effect (van Nimwegen et al., 1999, Wilke, 2001a) or more recently as the survival-of-the-flattest (Wilke et al., 2001) in clear reference to Darwin's survival-of-the-fittest concept. Indeed, authors who have casted doubts about the relevance of the quasispecies model to real viruses based their criticism in the fact that the quasispecies effect was never observed in vivo (Holmes and Moya, 2002, Jenkins et al., 2001). However, two recent experiments give strong support to the validity of the quasispecies effect for real viral populations. In the first experiment, two viroids (small circular RNAs that infect plants and do not encode for any protein) populations were allowed to compete at increasing mutation rates (Codoñer et al., 2006). At low mutation rate the faster but genetically homogeneous replicator outcompeted the slower but highly polymorphic one, as expected from the survival-of-the-fittest effect. However, the result of the competition was reversed at high mutation rate and the slower replicator won the competition by taking advantage of its larger mutational robustness. In the second study (Sanjuán et al., 2007), two populations of Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) that differed in their replication rates and robustness competed at increasing concentrations of chemical mutagens. Below a certain concentration of mutagens, the fittest VSV outcompeted the flattest one. Above this critical concentration, the competition result was reverted and the flattest VSV systematically displaced the fittest one.
One peculiarity of viral infections that is usually ignored by most quasispecies models is the existence of a spatial population structure. Only a few studies have analyzed the error–threshold transition in a spatial context (Altemeyer and McCaskill, 2001, Toyabe and Sano, 2005). It is well known that spatial dynamics can deeply change the outcome of competition even under the absence of selection (Solé and Bascompte, 2006). Within infected hosts, viruses do not behave as a single well-stirred population but as a collection of subpopulations that colonize and reproduce on different compartments constituted by different tissues and organs. For example, it has been extensively shown that after infection, the Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is able to establish well-differentiated populations which are organ-specific and show limited gene flow among them (Bordería et al., 2007, Sanjuán et al., 2004). In these cases, organ-specificity appears not as a consequence of founder events but as a consequence of differences in the adaptive constraints imposed by heterogeneous cell types and the existence of fitness tradeoffs across organs. In the case of plant viruses, spatial structure appears at two different levels. First, it has been shown that different leaves can be infected with different viral subpopulations, which, for the case of perennial plants, may further differentiate into different branches and sub-branches, as it has been shown, for example, for Plum pox virus (PPV) (Jridi et al., 2006). In this case, population structure likely arises as a consequence of the strong bottlenecks associated with the systemic movement of viruses from source to sink leaves (Hall et al., 2001, Li and Roossinck, 2004, Sacristán et al., 2003). Second, within a given infected leaf, that for the sake of simplicity can be considered as a two-dimensional space, populations initiated at different infectious foci do not overlap after confluence but exclude each other, generating a patched distribution of genotypes (Dietrich and Maiss, 2003) (see Fig. 1).
In the present report we analyze the dynamics of two competing quasispecies by using a simple mean field model, in silico simulations with digital replicons, and a stochastic cellular automata (CA) model, which allows to simulate the competition process explicitly considering the potential effect of physical space. In all these approaches, the fit quasispecies has a fast replication rate but is surrounded by genotypes which are strongly deleterious and thus mutations always have a strong negative effect on the average population fitness. On the contrary, the flat one has a lower replication rate but is located at a neutral and highly connected region of sequence space, and thus mutations exert a mild impact on viral fitness. In particular, we are interested in studying the effect of increasing mutation rate on the outcome of the competition process, paying special attention to the role of spatial structure. In short, our results suggest the existence of a critical mutation rate at which an absorbing first-order phase transition with slowing down between selection for fast replication and selection for mutational robustness takes place. Beyond the critical mutation rate, the flat quasispecies outcompetes the fit one. In the vicinity of this transition both quasispecies can coexist during an extremely long time. Moreover, space is shown to broaden the conditions at which the survival-of-the-flattest can be observed. The results of the in silico simulations are in complete agreement with the mean field analysis.
Section snippets
Quasispecies mean field model
As a first approach to the analysis of the competition dynamics between two quasispecies located at two different fitness landscapes, a mean field model has been used. The model considers a perfectly mixed system with a fit quasispecies, x, and a flat one, y. Under the assumption , the model is defined by the following set of ODEs:where
In silico bit string model
Next, we extended the previous mean field model by considering two competing populations of quasispecies in the form of binary digital replicators, thus considering the whole mutant spectrum of the quasispecies, within a multidimensional sequence space. This computational approach has been previously used to study viral dynamics and evolution (Codoñer et al., 2006, Solé et al., 1999, Solé et al., 2006). Let us define two populations of digital replicons, given by a fit quasispecies, , and a
Bit string spatial model
We finally develop a spatially extended stochastic model including the whole quasispecies structure of both competing quasispecies. We define a state space , with zero-flux boundary conditions (simulating, for example, the bounded system of plant leaves). Each quasispecies (the fit, , and the flat, ) have a potential population composed of (with and ) binary strings which define the states of the automaton and correspond to the whole
Discussion
In the present work we have explored the dynamics of competition between two quasispecies located at two widely different fitness landscapes that correspond, respectively, to a high-fitness and low-robustness (the fittest landscape) and to a low-fitness and high-robustness (the flattest landscape) scenarios. The effect of different mutation rates on the outcome of the competition between these two quasispecies has been explored. A mean field model, in silico simulations with binary digital
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by an E.U. PACE Project grant to J. Sardanyés within the 6th Framework Program under Contract FP6-002035 (Programmable Artificial Cell Evolution) and by the Santa Fe Institute. Work in València was supported by Grant BFU2006-14819-C02-01/BMC from the Spanish MEC-FEDER and by the EMBO Young Investigator Program.
References (29)
- et al.
Three distinct mechanisms facilitate genetic isolation of sympatric Wheat streak mosaic virus lineages
Virology
(2001) - et al.
Stationary mutant distributions and evolutionary optimization
Bull. Math. Biol.
(1988) - et al.
Information catastrophe in RNA viruses through replication thresholds
J. Theor. Biol.
(2006) - et al.
Spatial supression of error catastrophe in a growing pattern
Physica D
(2005) Adaptive evolution on neutral networks
Bull. Math. Biol.
(2001)- et al.
Error threshold for spatially resolved evolution in the quasispecies model
Phys. Rev. Lett.
(2001) - et al.
Selection promotes organ compartmentalization in HIV-1: evidence from gag and pol genes
Evolution
(2007) - Codoñer, F.M., Daròs, J.A., Solé, R.V., Elena, S.F., 2006. The fittest versus the flattest: experimental confirmation...
- et al.
Fluorescent labeling reveals spatial separation of potyvirus populations in mixed infected “Nicotiana benthamiana” plants
J. Gen. Virol.
(2003) Quasispecies theory in virology
J. Virol.
(2002)
RNA virus mutations and fitness for survival
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
The Hypercycle. A Principle of Natural Self-Organization
Molecular quasispecies
J. Phys. Chem.
In vitro selection of variants of Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistant to 3’-azido-3’deoxythymidine and 2’,3’-dideoxyinosine
J. Virol.
Cited by (34)
Redundancy-selection trade-off in phenotype-structured populations
2021, Journal of Theoretical BiologyCitation Excerpt :Less fit phenotypes are able to outperform the fittest ones, if they are endowed with higher ‘mutational robustness’ due to some degree of neutrality. This effect is sometimes referred to as the ‘survival-of-the-flattest’ effect, in iconic opposition to the standard ‘survival-of-the-fittest’ paradigm (Wilke et al., 2001; Sardanyés et al., 2008). Although the occurrence of such behaviours is ubiquitous in biology, its characterisation depends crucially both on the genetic architecture and on the mutational topology of the evolving system under investigation (Huynen, 1996; Van Nimwegen et al., 1999; Draghi et al., 2010; Aguirre et al., 2011).
Variation approach to error threshold in generic fitness landscape
2017, Chinese Journal of PhysicsCitation Excerpt :However, it is puzzling that some RNA viruses [27,28] seem to have mutation rates close to (or even larger than) the error threshold. While the exact solution available for the single-peak Eigen model [12–15,29], many realistic features for viral evolution are left out, including multiple peaks in fitness landscape [30,31], survival of the flattest [32], spatial effects [33–35], mutational fitness effects [36] and so on. An exact solution incorporating these features seems out of reach.
Evolution of circoviruses in lorikeets lags behind its hosts
2016, Molecular Phylogenetics and EvolutionCitation Excerpt :Threshold structural limitations of encapsidation and the multifunctionality of Cap in attachment, uncoating, nuclear localisation and shuttling, then DNA binding in assembly is likely to limit phenotypic innovation. When such constraints are limiting, stabilising selection can account for host-fidelity especially if effective generation times are long (Sanjuan, 2012) and high rates of recombination permit genetic recycling (Beardmore et al., 2011; Lauring and Andino, 2010; Sardanyes et al., 2008). When phenotypic robustness is conserved for millennia host-fidelity provides a basis for much broader host-switching amongst all available host lineages expressed as an ancient host memory that can explain contemporary host-switching amongst early psittacopasserines but also from this group to more distantly related avian Orders including Strigiformes (Sarker et al., 2015b) and Coraciiformes (Sarker et al., 2015c).
Codon usage determines the mutational robustness, evolutionary capacity, and virulence of an RNA virus
2012, Cell Host and MicrobeCitation Excerpt :We speculate that a successful population will harbor individual variants that are preadapted to a broad range of selective pressures, ensuring viral survival and spread. This paradigm applies to both mammalian hosts, with their diverse spatial and immune environments, and cellular monocultures, where changes in gene expression, membrane structures, and innate immune responses generate shifting fitness landscapes (for theoretical discussion of robustness and spatial environments, see Sardanyés et al. [2008]). Given that we have sampled just two points in the vast expanse of sequence space, it is interesting that SD was attenuated, and Max was phenotypically closer to the WT.
Viral population dynamics and virulence thresholds
2012, Current Opinion in MicrobiologyCitation Excerpt :Viruses have been described as moving through varying fitness landscapes where peaks represent high-fitness genotypes and valleys represent low-fitness genotypes [7,18•,23]. ‘Survival of the flattest’ is a fitness landscape model proposing that under high mutation rates robust genomes of submaximal fitness are favored over fast homogeneous replicators with the highest fitness [24,25,26••]. Robustness is resistance to phenotypic change due to mutation, relative to parental sequence.
Fitness Landscape Analysis of a tRNA Gene Reveals that the Wild Type Allele is Sub-optimal, Yet Mutationally Robust
2022, Molecular Biology and Evolution