ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Journal of Sound and Vibration
Volume 285, Issues 1-2, 6 July 2005, Pages 1-25
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (477 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2004.08.007    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Analysis and DSP implementation of an ANC system using a filtered-error neural network

Ya-Li Zhoua, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Qi-Zhi Zhanga, Xiao-Dong Lib and Woon-Seng Ganc

aDepartment of Computer Science and Automation, Beijing Institute of Machinery, P.O. Box 2865, Beijing 100085, People's Republic of China bInstitute of Acoustic, Academia Sinica, Beijing 100080, People's Republic of China cSchool of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore

Received 16 October 2003; 
revised 8 June 2004; 
accepted 11 August 2004. 
Available online 23 November 2004.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

In this paper, feedforward active noise control (ANC) using a neural network (NN) based on filtered-error back-propagation (BP) algorithm is considered. The filtered-error BP NN (FEBPNN) algorithm is first derived, and the difference between the FEBPNN algorithm and the filtered-X BP NN (FXBPNN) algorithm is given to show that the FEBPNN algorithm offers computational advantage over the FXBPNN algorithm. Computer simulations are carried out to compare the FEBPNN algorithm with the filtered-X least mean square (FXLMS) algorithm and the FXBPNN algorithm. The controllers based on the FEBPNN algorithm and the FXLMS algorithm are implemented on a Texas Instruments digital signal processor (DSP) TMS320VC33. The simulations and the experimental verification tests show that the FEBPNN algorithm performs as well as the FXLMS algorithm for a linear control problem, and better for a nonlinear control problem, at the same time, the simulations and the experimental verification tests also show that the convergence rate of the FEBPNN is acceptable, and the FEBPNN has better tracking ability under changes of the primal signal, the primary path and the secondary path. The experiments also lead to the conclusion that more work is required to improve the predictability and consistency of the performance of the NN controller based on the FEBPNN algorithm.

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. BPNN algorithms development
2.1. FXBPNN algorithm
2.2. FEBPNN algorithm
2.3. Comparison of the two algorithms
3. Simulation examples
4. Experimental implementation
4.1. Experimental setup
4.2. Secondary path identification
4.3. Active noise cancelation
5. Discussion of results
6. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References


























 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.