doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2004.01.009
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
Free vibration analysis of piezoelectric coupled thin and thick annular plate
W.H. Duan, S.T. Quek
,
and Q. Wang1
Department of Civil Engineering, National University of Singapore, 1 Engineering Drive 2, EIA-07-03, Singapore
Received 23 May 2003;
accepted 12 January 2004.
Available online 3 September 2004.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Abstract
This paper presents the free vibration analysis of piezoelectric coupled annular plates using the Kirchhoff and Mindlin plate models. The distribution of electric potential along the thickness direction in the piezoelectric layer is simulated by a sinusoidal function such that the Maxwell static electricity equation is satisfied. The analytical solutions are derived and validated by comparing the resonant frequencies and mode shapes of the piezoelectric coupled annular plates with those obtained by finite element (FE) analysis. Mindlin model provides better solutions than those from Kirchhoff model and the deviation from FE results is larger for higher resonant frequencies. The piezoelectric layer increases the resonant frequencies, being more significant for thicker layers. The effect is smaller for higher modes and for smaller radius to thickness ratio of the plate. The analytical solutions and findings contribute towards a simplified model for the parametric study and understanding of vibration of piezoelectric-coupled annular plate, relevant to the design of ultrasonic motor.
Fig. 1. Annular plate surface mounted with two piezoelectric layers.
Fig. 2. Comparison of first three displacement mode shapes for annular plate (h=0.01 for thin plate condition and 0.03 for moderately thick plate condition) under C–C and S–S conditions from FE and proposed solutions.
Fig. 3. Frequency ratio based on FEM simulation under C–C conditions (full line [left axis] — piezoelectric coupled plate with r0/h=60 and h1/2h=1/10 not accounting for piezoelectric effect over plate with piezoelectric layer removed (h1=0); dotted line [right axis] — piezoelectric coupled plate accounting for piezoelectric effect over same plate without piezoelectric effect).
Table 1.
Material properties

Table 2.
Comparison of frequencies (rad/s) of thin annular plate under C–C, C–S, S–C, S–S boundary conditions for r0/h=60

p=Number of nodal diameters, n=number of nodal circles, C=clamped, S=simply supported.
a First letter denotes edge condition at inner edge.
Table 3.
Comparison of frequencies (rad/s) of moderately thick annular plate under C–C, C–S, S–C, S–S boundary conditions for r0/h=20

p=Number of nodal diameters, n=number of nodal circles, C=clamped, S=simply supported.
a First letter denotes edge condition at inner edge.
Table 4.
Frequencies (rad/s) of annular plate under C–C boundary condition with piezoelectric layers of different thickness

p=Number of nodal diameters, n=number of nodal circles.