ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Journal of Systems and Software
Volume 79, Issue 7, July 2006, Pages 962-968
Selected papers from the 11th Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC2004)
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (120 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jss.2005.06.041    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Accessing embedded program in untestable mobile environment: Experience of a trustworthiness approachstar, open

Karl R.P.H. Leunga, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Joseph K.-Y. Ngb, E-mail The Corresponding Author and W.L. Yeungc, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aCompuware Software Testing Laboratory, Department of Information and Communications Technology, Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Tsing Yi), Hong Kong bDepartment of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong cDepartment of Computing and Decision Sciences, Lingnan University, Hong Kong

Received 6 December 2004; 
accepted 20 June 2005. 
Available online 19 January 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Comparing actual output with the expected output of some controlled input is a fundamental principle of program correctness testing. However, in some situations, the input is uncontrollable or even undetectable during testing, it is impossible to decide the expected output or the test oracle. Or in some situations, the output may be indeterministic or unpredictable, hence it is impossible to compare the output with the expected one. We encountered these problems and could not conduct normal program testing when we developed programs to extract network data from various mobile stations in the Mobile Location Estimation System project. Instead we analyzed the program output and challenge it against the intrinsic properties, the environment, the program itself, and the application results to find evidence that the output is suitable to be used for the planned purposes. In short, we accessed the trustworthiness of the programs. In the development of our mobile software, it was common that different programs of the same specification had to be developed for mobile stations of different models. These different implementations provided another source of reference for trustworthiness assessment. Our experience of applying the trustworthiness approach to developing software for extracting network data from mobile stations is reported in this paper.

Keywords: Untestable environment; Mobile embedded software testing

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Untestable situations
3. MLES
4. Testing problems in MLES
5. Trustworthiness assessment
5.1. Necessary condition
5.2. Trustworthiness
5.2.1. Intrinsic properties assessment
5.2.2. Environmental assessment
5.2.3. Output assessment
5.2.4. Application results assessment
6. Experiment results
6.1. Experiment output
6.2. Necessary condition
6.3. Trustworthiness
6.3.1. Intrinsic properties assessment
6.3.2. Environmental assessment
6.3.3. Output assessments
6.4. Application results assessment
6.4.1. Assessment conclusion
7. Discussion
8. Conclusion
References

Journal of Systems and Software
Volume 79, Issue 7, July 2006, Pages 962-968
Selected papers from the 11th Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC2004)
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.