ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Volume 38, Issue 6, November-December 2004, Pages 583-589
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (172 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.03.004    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Suicide risk management for the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression study: applied NIMH guidelines

Andrew A. NierenbergCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Madhukar H. Trivedi, Louise Ritz, Diane Burroughs, John Greist, Harold Sackeim, Susan Kornstein, Terry Schwartz, Diane Stegman, Maurizio Fava and Stephen R. Wisniewski

Clinical Research Program, Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, ACC 812, 15 Parkman Street, Boston MA 01224, USA

Received 14 November 2003; 
Revised 25 February 2004; 
accepted 12 March 2004. 
Available online 25 May 2004.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

NIMH guidelines to manage subjects who are suicidal during their participation in clinical trials include a full range of procedures to minimize suicidal risk, yet no reports to date have shown how researchers should best implement these guidelines. The architects of the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) study operationalized and implemented the NIMH guidelines by developing a comprehensive set of procedures to detect, monitor, and manage suicidal subjects during a large, complex, multisite clinical trial. Because of the large size of the study (anticipated n=4000), the wide geographic distribution, the large number of treating STAR*D clinicians, the broad array of subjects with psychiatric and medical comorbidities, and the focus on treatment-resistant depression, along with the complexity of multiple treatment steps and randomization points in STAR*D, the risk of suicide, safety monitoring of suicidal subjects presented a unique challenge. This paper describes methods derived from the NIMH guidelines used to manage suicidal risk in STAR*D including the use of an interactive voice response system to alert clinicians, regional center directors, and safety officers.

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. NIMH guidelines for research of subjects at risk of suicide
3. STAR*D
4. Risk of suicide for STAR*D subjects
5. Procedures to minimize suicidal risk for STAR*D subjects
5.1. Evaluation and detection
6. Procedures to intervene when suicidal risk is detected
7. Preliminary data
8. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References

Journal of Psychiatric Research
Volume 38, Issue 6, November-December 2004, Pages 583-589
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.