Elsevier

Journal of Power Sources

Volume 276, 15 February 2015, Pages 347-356
Journal of Power Sources

B-site Mo-doped perovskite Pr0.4Sr0.6 (Co0.2Fe0.8)1−xMoxO3−σ (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2) as electrode for symmetrical solid oxide fuel cell

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.141Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Pr0.4Sr0.6(Co0.2Fe0.8)1−xMoxO3−σ is applied as symmetrical electrode materials SSOFCs.

  • Cubic perovskite phase of PSCFM is formed after sintered at 1100 °C for PSCFMx (x = 0, 0.05 and 0.1) samples.

  • The structure of PSCFM can be repeatedly changed and recovered in dry H2 and in air.

  • PSCFM0.05 symmetrical electrode shows the lowest polarization resistance (Rp) at 900 °C.

  • The maximum power densities of a single SSOFC reach 493 and 160 mW cm−2 at 850 °C in H2 and CH4, respectively.

Abstract

Pr0.4Sr0.6(Co0.2Fe0.8)1−xMoxO3−σ (PSCFMx, x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2), which obtained by doping molybdenum at the B site of Pr0.4Sr0.6Co0.2Fe0.8O3−σ (PSCF) cathode, have been synthesized by a solid state reaction method and studied towards the application as symmetrical electrode materials for symmetrical SOFCs (SSOFCs) in this study. It is found that cubic perovskite phase of PSCFM in the Pm/3 m space group is formed after sintered at 1100 °C for PSCFMx (x = 0, 0.05 and 0.1) samples, and the main phase is converted to K2NiF4 structure identified as SrPrFeO4 in the I4/m space group, and some new phases of Pr2O3 and CoFe-alloy appear after PSCFMx is heat-treated in dry H2 at 900 °C for 2 h. The K2NiF4 structure SrPrFeO4 can be transferred to a pure cubic structure of PSCFMx again by calcining it in air at 900 °C. The maximum power densities of a single SSOFC based on the PSCFM0.05 symmetrical electrode, which shows the lowest polarization resistances (Rp), are 493 and 160 mW cm−2 at 850 °C in H2 and CH4, respectively. No obvious degradation is observed during a 100 h stability test in CH4, which suggests that PSCFM material is a potential symmetrical electrode for SSOFCs.

Introduction

Symmetrical solid oxide fuel cells (SSOFCs) has been developed as a novel concept of SOFCs in the past few years. [1], [2] In this configuration, the same material is used simultaneously as both the anode and cathode, which has several advantages comparing to the typical SOFCs design. One of the most important advantages is the possibility to address issues related to sulphur poisoning and carbon deposition by simply reversing the gas flows. Also, the development of SSOFCs simplifies significantly the process for the preparation of fuel cells, owing to the assembly of the electrolyte and the symmetrical electrodes can be performed just in one thermal step, hence decreasing the fabrication cost. Additionally, the chemical compatibility problems will also be minimized by using the same material as both the anode and cathode because two identical electrolyte–electrode interfaces are used in comparison with the typical electrolyte-anode and electrolyte–cathode interfaces in the traditional SOFCs. [3] Since the anode is in a reducing environment, while the cathode is in an oxidizing environment, the requirements for a material to be considered as a SSOFCs electrode are rather restrictive. The materials used for SSOFCs electrode should match all the conditions applicable to both of anode and cathode; furthermore, some other special requirements are imposed as following: 1) the chemical and structural stability in both reducing and oxidizing environments; 2) dual electrocatalytic activity for both oxygen reduction and fuel oxidation; 3) acceptable electronic conductivity and ionic conductivity in both conditions to reduce ohmic losses and promote electrochemical reactions, respectively. To date, there are only limited reports showing that an oxide can be effectively applied as the SSOFCs electrode.

There are three kinds of symmetrical electrode materials according to the source from interconnect, anode and cathode materials, respectively. The anode materials are commonly prepared in oxidizing atmospheres, while operate under reducing environments, and exhibit high electronic conductivity and good catalytic activity towards fuel oxidation. Hence, the main concern to use an anode material as the symmetrical electrode material is to investigate whether the selected material will also have appreciable electronic conductivity in oxidizing conditions and good catalytic activity for oxygen reduction. La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3−σ (LSCM) was reported as the first material in the proof of the concept in SSOFCs by Bastidas and Ruiz-Morales. [1], [2] A maximum power density of 300 and 230 mW cm−2 were obtained at 900 °C, with the cell of LSCM as symmetrical electrode and yttria-stabilised zirconia (YSZ) as electrolyte, in wet H2 and wet CH4, respectively. And Ruiz–Morales et al. optimized the microstructure of the LSCM electrode, using poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) microspheres as templates, achieved the maximum power density values of 500 and 300 mW cm−2 at 950 °C in wet H2 and CH4, respectively. Zhu et al. [4] used the dry-pressing method to fabricate an SSOFC with a dense thin YSZ electrolyte film sandwiched between two symmetrical porous YSZ layers in which LSCM based anode and cathode were incorporated using wet impregnation techniques. The maximum power density of a single cell with 32 wt.% LSCM impregnated YSZ anode and cathode reached 333 and 265 mW cm−2 at 900 °C in dry H2 and CH4, respectively. These values were further improved through the incorporation of 6 wt.% Ni during the impregnation process, and the performances were enhanced to 570 and 550 mW cm−2 at 900 °C for dry H2 and CH4, respectively. El-Himri et al. [5] used the Pr to substitute La in LSCM, and investigated the performance of Pr0.7Sr0.3Cr1−yMnyO3−σ (PSCM, y = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8) as the SSOFCs electrodes, and reached the modest values of power densities 250 and 160 mW cm−2 at 950 °C, under humidified H2 and CH4, respectively. Canales-Vázquez et al. used La4Sr8Ti12−xFexO38−σ (LSTF) as the symmetrical electrode, and 100 mW cm−2 at 900 °C in wet H2 was obtained in a symmetrical configuration. Recently, Liu et al. reported a new promising symmetrical electrode material Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6−σ (SFM), and the power densities obtained in SFM/LSGM/SFM single cell were 835 and 230 mW cm−2 at 900 °C under wet H2 and CH4, respectively.

The interconnect materials, such as chromites, possess most of the requirements for a symmetrical electrode. Therefore, Ca-doped LaCrO3 perovskite becomes a popular symmetrical electrode material in recent years. [6], [7], [8], [9] The maximum power density obtained in the SSOFC was 387 mW cm−2 at 850 °C in dry H2 using a 300 μm LSGM as the electrolyte. [7]

Only a few reports can be found on the symmetrical electrode from the cathode material of the traditional SOFCs, owing to the low electrical conductivity and worse stability of cathode materials in the reducing environment. [10], [11] Lai et al. [12] applied La0.6Sr0.4Co0.8Fe0.2O3−σ (LSCF) directly as a symmetrical electrode but a rather low performance of 210 μW cm−2 at 545 °C with a low OCV of 0.18 V was obtained because the LSCF possesses much lower electronic and ionic conductivities in a reducing environment than in an oxidizing environment. Zheng et al. [13] used the Sc-doped La0.8Sr0.2MnO3−σ (LSSM) as the symmetrical electrode, and the maximum power densities of 310 and 130 mW cm−2 at 900 °C in wet H2 and CH4, respectively, were achieved. Liu et al. [14] synthesized Sc-substituted La0.6Sr0.4FeO3−σ (LSFSc) mixed conducting oxides as symmetrical electrode and applied thin La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3−σ film with the impregnated nano-scale LSFSc catalysts as electrolyte for SSOFCs, and the maximum power densities of 560 mW cm−2 in H2 at 800 °C was reached.

So far, the main symmetrical electrode materials are chosen from the anode and interconnect materials in traditional SOFCs. Therefore, the candidates are very limit. In this study, a new symmetrical electrode Pr0.4Sr0.6(Co0.2Fe0.8)1−xMoxO3−σ (PSCFMx, x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2), which was from the Mo-doped typical cathode material Pr0.4Sr0.6Co0.2Fe0.8O3−σ was reported. An excellently redox recyclability in crystal structure, high cell performance and long-term stability during 100 h test in CH4 were observed with this kind of perovskite oxide.

Section snippets

Sample preparation and cell fabrication

Pr0.4Sr0.6(Co0.2Fe0.8)1−xMoxO3−σ (PSCFMx) (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2) perovskite oxides were prepared by solid–state reaction from the materials with high purity: Pr(NO3)3·6H2O, SrCO3, Co(NO3)2·6H2O, Fe2O3 and MoO3 (99.9% Wako, Japan). These materials were mixed well by ball milling. The calcinations of the precursor powders were performed at 1100 °C for 10 h in air to obtain a pure phase. Then, such oxides were ball milled again for 12 h. After that, the finely ground oxide powders were pressed

Phase and microstructure characteristics

Fig. 1 shows XRD patterns of the synthesized PSCFMx (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2) powders sintered at 1000 °C for 7 h. The peaks for all the samples of x ≤ 0.1 matched a cubic perovskite phase. The absence of other peaks indicated that any additional phases were present below the detection limit and that the obtained different Mo doping materials were therefore of high phase-purity. However, for the sample with x = 0.2, an impurity phase defined as SrMoO4 (PDF-# 08–0482) was observed at 2θ

Conclusions

A potential material PSCFMx (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2) which can be used as both anode and cathode for SOFC is synthesized by solid state reaction method and characterized. It is found that a pure cubic perovskite phase is formed after calcination at 1100 °C in air for the samples with x = 0, 0.05 as well as 0.1. However, a secondary phase defined as SrMoO4 is formed in the case of x = 0.2. The main phase of PSCFM converts to K2NiF4 structure after heat treated in H2 at 900 °C, and the K2NiF4

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Aomori City Government, Japan. P. Zhang gratefully acknowledges the scholarship from the State Scholarship Fund of China Scholarship Council (2012) and Deni S. Khaerudini gratefully acknowledges the scholarship from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan. The authors also thank Professor Takeshi Kubota at NJRISE for his technical support on experiments.

References (40)

  • J.C. Ruiz-Morales et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2006)
  • X. Zhu et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2011)
  • A. El-Himri et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2009)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    Int. J. Hydrog. Energy

    (2011)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2011)
  • T.L. Cable et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2007)
  • B. Lin et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2010)
  • A. Yan et al.

    Appl. Catal. B Environ.

    (2006)
  • A. Yan et al.

    Appl. Catal. B Environ.

    (2007)
  • B.-K. Lai et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2011)
  • Y. Zheng et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2009)
  • X. Liu et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2014)
  • H. Lv et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2007)
  • Q. Liu et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2011)
  • J. Meng et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2014)
  • G. Xiao et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2012)
  • Q. Zhou et al.

    Electrochem. Commun.

    (2012)
  • Q.-H. Wu et al.

    Mater. Lett.

    (2005)
  • R. Scurtu et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (2014)
  • Y.-M. Yin et al.

    Int. J. Hydrog. Energy

    (2011)
  • Cited by (95)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text